There are three asset classes, equity, debt and cash. Stocks, bonds and money markets. Any intelligent investor will hold all three, in percentages based on age and risk profile. A good rule of thumb for non-professionals is to have 110% minus your age in equity. In bear markets equity should be curtailed significantly. Nobody should ever have all equity. EVER.
ETF's were sexy fifteen years ago. Don't tell me about yesterday's news. Next point, fees, why would you want to pay buy and sell commissions on an S&P ETF when you can get the same thing from Vanguard or T Rowe with no commissions? Management fees for index funds are ridiculously low across the board.
About fees, Suzy Orman did all of the pikers wrong in the worst way when she started harping on fees and everyone took up that ridiculous drumbeat. Fund returns are reported net of fees and expenses, so if XYZ fund shows a net return of 6.8% but I see it has an expense ratio of 1.2% whilst fund ABC shows a net return of 5.3% and only has an expense ratio of .4%, does that mean I should give up the extra 1.5% of return because I want to spite some fund manager? Absolutely idiotic thinking.
Yeah. Tony Robbins. Why don't you go ahead and lead us in a round of woo claps. Or woah claps, or whatever the hell it was. The man is an idiot who loves two things, talking about how great he is and how great you could be if only you were just like him, and taking money from people who want to hear about how great he is and how great you could be if only you were just like him.
I wasn't attacking you with my earlier post, I just didn't want OP steered the wrong way. I've been a broker, and I've spent the last 18 years in the 401k business. Nobody here hasn't shopped at one of our clients, or eaten or used or driven one of their products. We manage some of the biggest retirement plans in the country. This is what I do for a living.