If there are no miners, who is processing the transaction?
The miners are validating every transaction.
If BTC miners are on the front lines and receive BTC as the reward for completing "blocks" of verified transactions, why are we comfortable with our biggest adversaries virtually owning this critical piece of the BTC ecosystem? With such a high percentage of miners concentrated in a few problem countries, how do we even know that their operations aren’t fraudulently verifying transactions? Yeah, I’m not interested in the whole “decentralized” argument because when you then take it a step further down the supply chain BTC ownership is also highly concentrated (although I wish I could find a legitimate source for the precise percentage). So, let’s recap - you have HIGH concentration in both BTC mining and ownership yet it’s “decentralized”? And, in the day and age when US politics and a presidential election can be influenced via bad actors nobody thinks BTC could be a scheme and manipulated? As if my 12 year old son couldn’t create a bunch of YouTube videos, bots, Twitter handles, websites, etc. to push a BTC agenda. Anyway, for those of you making a fortune from BTC and crypto all the power to you. If you can’t beat them, join them. Just wish there were enough answers to convince me starting with how nobody knows the origin or identity of Satoshi Nakamoto.
I dont think we're comfortable at all with it. To me, the Digital Yuan or a Chinese "stable" coin replacing the dollar as global reserve currency frightens me. To me it's one of the biggest threats to our democracy.
I think the US realizes this, now at least. Appointing Genseler as Chair of the SEC was a big move, and honesty prob the best thing I've seen Biden do as Pres, but that's a topic for the CE Board.
ETH is moving to a proof of stake operation model. When implemented, it won't require mining (like the proof of work model).
PoS as a stand alone entity is not the best model. While ETH has been having it's moment, I still think it's long term viability is most likely to be challenged by a competitor. You already saw the NBA pull away from the Ethereum blockahin and into their own chain. As I've said in the past, high costs & slow speed are leaving the door wide open for competitive chains to take market share, which they're doing.
For example, I moved 3k in coins on a DeFi platform that is run on the HECO chain for less than $.10. The transaction also occurs in less than 15 seconds. That same transaction on the Ethereum chain would cost me $30 and could take 15 mins. Less than 10 cents vs $30. Seconds vs minutes. They're going to have to implement changes quickly (which theyve shown an inability in the past to do so) to maintain their dominance.
Another similar chain - NEO is essentially the Chinese Ethereum. Except its built to be centralized and in theory regulated. Two things the Chinese govt love to do.
Eth aside, I've said for a while that anything from 30 - 75k for a BTC would surprise me in the near term. We topped out at 65k and appeared to bottom out just south of 30k. In a perfect world, BTC will hold 35k to 40k in the near term, before the next set of announcements roll out. Apple should be announcing in the coming months that they're accepting BTC as part of Apple Pay, and I think we'll see more corporations or institutions purchasing or adding to their positions in the near future.
I keep dripping into BTC, just as I do into the SPY, my 401k and my 529. I've also spent a ton of time trying to learn DeFi platforms. The more our govt threatens to regulate and tax crypto, the faster the push into DeFi will be.