I have one, but rarely carry it, because, they are antiquated. It sits in the charger at home.Sounds like you need a beeper 😀.
I have one, but rarely carry it, because, they are antiquated. It sits in the charger at home.Sounds like you need a beeper 😀.
i bet it was a higher percentage last year. Not that many competitors. I‘m going guess Mach E is next up.
And that's the problem with prototypes. We're teased with amazing features and futuristic styling, only to be disappointed with the actual production vehicle. Mercedes just did this with the EQS. Interior and exterior changed significantly. There's also a laundry list of features in the prototype that the production version does not have. Seems like a waste of time and resources.I don't think they NEED it, but 600 miles will be well beyond the point where naysayers can bring up range, even in light of road trips and long en-route charging times. For me, 400 miles, across weather ranges, is the point where they'll get attractive. Or 300 with sub-10-minute 10 to 100 percent (not 80) charging.
And no, not readily scalable right now. The EQXX is really a test bed with bleeding edge tech that we won't start to see for at least another cycle or two.
For instance, the battery pack managed to weigh roughly half the weight of the EQS pack despite having nearly the same capacity (100 v 108 kWh, iirc). That was done using tech directly from Formula 1/ E and some type of greeny composite made from sugar Cane and carbon fiber. The active rear aero was derived from an earlier tail-extender concept car from Frankfurt Motor Show a few years back. EQXX CoD is a groundbreaking 0.17.
But it will be interesting to see those types of features become more prevalent moving forward. Just saw Ford talking about adding active aero to its next electric truck.
you mean like the cybertruck? waste of time and money.And that's the problem with prototypes. We're teased with amazing features and futuristic styling, only to be disappointed with the actual production vehicle. Mercedes just did this with the EQS. Interior and exterior changed significantly. There's also a laundry list of features in the prototype that the production version does not have. Seems like a waste of time and resources.
Prototype:
![]()
![]()
Reality:
![]()
![]()
You'll be proven wrong.....again.you mean like the cybertruck? waste of time and money.
There is no problem with prototypes. Once again you're showing the depth of your ignorance about the automotive industry, and about technology in general.And that's the problem with prototypes. We're teased with amazing features and futuristic styling, only to be disappointed with the actual production vehicle. Mercedes just did this with the EQS. Interior and exterior changed significantly. There's also a laundry list of features in the prototype that the production version does not have. Seems like a waste of time and resources.
And that's the problem with prototypes. We're teased with amazing features and futuristic styling, only to be disappointed with the actual production vehicle. Mercedes just did this with the EQS. Interior and exterior changed significantly. There's also a laundry list of features in the prototype that the production version does not have. Seems like a waste of time and resources.
Prototype:
![]()
![]()
Reality:
![]()
![]()
When's that cybertruck first delivery again?You'll be proven wrong.....again.
This is too funny. They are really trying hard to get people to like the stupid cyber truck.@Knight Shift , do you like this ?
![]()
Futuristic Ford ‘F-E50’ concept proves the age of the Tesla Cybertruck is here
The Tesla Cybertruck’s design may be controversial due to its unapologetically futuristic Cyberpunk elements, but even after its eventful unveiling, speculations were abounding among the EV community that the radical pickup truck may end up being the first of a new breed of vehicles. A recently...www.teslarati.com
LOL. That is one ridiculously stupid article. But at least the slurpfest on "teslarati" is occurring in the right place.@Knight Shift , do you like this ?
![]()
Futuristic Ford ‘F-E50’ concept proves the age of the Tesla Cybertruck is here
The Tesla Cybertruck’s design may be controversial due to its unapologetically futuristic Cyberpunk elements, but even after its eventful unveiling, speculations were abounding among the EV community that the radical pickup truck may end up being the first of a new breed of vehicles. A recently...www.teslarati.com
It's a very dumb article. But to be fair, the cheerleading for tesla makes sense on that website where non-tesla fetishists can ignore it.This is too funny. They are really trying hard to get people to like the stupid cyber truck.
There was another car thread here? Really? LOL@Knight Shift , thought you might be interested in this. I would put it in the Non-Tesla hybrids and electrical vehicles thread, but once again, the new mod has deleted it.
Not at all@Knight Shift , do you like this ?
![]()
Futuristic Ford ‘F-E50’ concept proves the age of the Tesla Cybertruck is here
The Tesla Cybertruck’s design may be controversial due to its unapologetically futuristic Cyberpunk elements, but even after its eventful unveiling, speculations were abounding among the EV community that the radical pickup truck may end up being the first of a new breed of vehicles. A recently...www.teslarati.com
A futuristic, armored, personal carrier from a sci-fi movie might not be everyone's cup of tea. Once you get past the aesthetics, you'll see Tesla has changed the script on how to build a truck.This is too funny. They are really trying hard to get people to like the stupid cyber truck.
You've quoted some particularly silly marketing hyperbole.A futuristic, armored, personal carrier from a sci-fi movie might not be everyone's cup of tea. Once you get past the aesthetics, you'll see Tesla has changed the script on how to build a truck.
"Tesla adopted a new construction and a new alloy. Big trucks still feature the ancient body-on-frame architecture, which means that the drivetrain basically drags the body and the bed, which isn’t very efficient. So Tesla designed an exoskeleton, a fancier word for unibody layout, to move the stress from the frame to the outer skin of the vehicle.
By doing so, it obtained better capability in the same dimensions and weight as the Ford F-150, Chevrolet Silverado, and Ram 1500. In case you missed it, the Cybertruck has a towing capability of 14,000 pounds, more than any other truck in this segment, while payload is also superior at 3,500 pounds. At the same time, it’s quicker and faster."
https://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-n...xoskeleton-and-design-explained-ar187129.html
FIFYJust buy a Tesla if you want an overpriced and very ugly car with reliability issues.
The big problem, Ford can't make many of these vehicles (and definitely not for a profit yet).
Ford F150, Chevy Silverado, Ram 1500, Toyota Tacoma, and Nissan Titan still use body-on-frame. Since we're talking about pickups, and the listed vehicles are the best selling brands, you're first statement is completely false.You've quoted some particularly silly marketing hyperbole.
Plenty of large vehicle makers have moved away from body-on-frame designs already, long before Tesla's Cybertruck was conceived. The Cybertruck has no towing capability at all, at the moment, seeing as how it doesn't actually exist as a saleable product yet.
And the last thing we need are quicker/faster large heavy vehicles. Especially if they're going to be driven by a software.
Any why would anybody want to pay that much just to have to "get past" the outrageously ugly aesthetics? I keep hoping that the actual production version has dropped the attention-seeking ugly design and adopted a more attractive and adult design that looks less like something a third grader with massive personality disorders would design.
This is hilarious. Let's penalize those who've made an effort to reduce their carbon footprint.![]()
Are EV, hybrid owners paying a fair share? Louisiana bill would charge annual fee for cars
Legislation to charge Louisiana drivers who own electric or hybrid vehicles an annual state road usage fee cleared the House Transportation Committee.www.yahoo.com