That is not what the average teenage girl runs. Last year, 12.8 finished 9th in Group 3 at the Group 3 state champs in track. The numbers in the article you quoted are SO BAD they are ********.
Yards and meters are different things.
That is not what the average teenage girl runs. Last year, 12.8 finished 9th in Group 3 at the Group 3 state champs in track. The numbers in the article you quoted are SO BAD they are ********.
First off there is a 1 min rest between reps in that plan. Often the rest is 1.5 mins. The way the athletes described the resulting issues during it I would guess there was insufficient rest/recovery.
Secondly, 19 vs 17 makes a big difference in repeats as it dictates how much oxygen is being used up and how anaerobic the athlete goes..
You conveniently left out crucial facts: "Smith, 41, was investigated and cleared of inappropriate conduct when he was head softball coach at Owens Community College in Ohio from 2014 to 2016."The husband was investigated for similar behavior at the JuCo as well. That's enough smoke for me.
You conveniently left out crucial facts: "Smith, 41, was investigated and cleared of inappropriate conduct when he was head softball coach at Owens Community College in Ohio from 2014 to 2016."
I was responding to this from ASHOKAN:Yards and meters are different things.
So was OJ...You conveniently left out crucial facts: "Smith, 41, was investigated and cleared of inappropriate conduct when he was head softball coach at Owens Community College in Ohio from 2014 to 2016."
I was responding to this from ASHOKAN:
"The average under-17 girl can complete a 100-meter sprint in 12.8 to 13.1"
https://livehealthy.chron.com/average-running-speed-teenage-girl-10107.html
You do realize that I am a retired NJ HS T&F coach right?
True - those are average times for track sprinters.
100 yards isn't very far, and 17 seconds should be basic for B1G SB athlete.
Here's a sprint workout from VT women's softball. Rutgers coach is right in there time wise (as mentioned the interval is a key and that was excluded)
Virginia Tech Softball's Conditioning Plan
![]()
https://www.stack.com/a/virginia-tech-softballs-conditioning-plan
The workout you linked was doing 8 reps with 1 min rest and when they went to 10 reps the rest went to 2 mins. Just pointing out not jogging or trivial like some have suggested. Also important was when they had them run,,, was it after a 2 hour practice in the hot sun, etc?True - but they were also doing more reps in that plan (twice as many) and "Max Effort" isn't noted like the other distances.
If people are out of shape, and running 6 100s in 17 seconds is gassing them then that's fine. But these sprints are being presented as something cruel and unusual for athletes who do a lot of sprinting for their D1 sport
100 yards in less than 17 seconds is a jog. I didn't realize softball players were so pampered.
...and don’t even get me started about having them do 17-second 100’s. We use to do EJ d sprints all night for soccer, hoops, based baseball etc, this is NOTHING new.
Oh, for Christ's sake.Good for Hobbs. Hope he pulls nj.com credentials on anything related to Rutgers sports.
This sounds like a bunch of disgruntled players that were processed out by the new staff. Weight shaming??? They're scholarship athletes in the B1G and should be held to high physical fitness standards to actually be competitive and win. The culture was so bad under the new staff that they improved from 19-31 to 29-26. Time to get in better condition, if you can't take the running. :Pray: :Praying: there's no video.
What? The team was horrible so you process them out ASAP. Half the team?
Why? He was an approved volunteer assistant.
overreaction
Its crazy that our old AD was so inept with the media they had to hire handlers for her and the next AD we hire calls reporters f'ing scum. Its mind boggling.
Not when the article is a hit piece.Amazing the lack of journalistic integrity. Isnt this benchmark relevant to the facts in the story?
Tomorrow? Think that it is splattered widely already.Insane that Hobbs and co. haven't put out a statement to get ahead of this before shit truly hits the fan tomorrow.
Tomorrow? Think that it is splattered widely already.
Wasn't he cleared?The husband was investigated for similar behavior at the JuCo as well. That's enough smoke for me.
He'd issue a better apology and have to go through some training and maybe a performance improvement plan. I don't care for or condone the response but times are different now with POTUS and some other CEOs like TMo ripping people and companies on social media.What would you do if a top executive of your company was quoted that way? And Hobbs is representing not a company, but a university.
Wasn't he cleared?
This NJ.com article states there were 10 girls that transferred. I would be interested to know to which schools they transferred. Additionally, are they starting on their new teams; or have they given up the sport. New coach, abilities questioned, no longer a starter, playing less, egos hurt, easier to blame the coach than their own ability as a player; or the fact they were not in shape.
Its crazy that our old AD was so inept with the media they had to hire handlers for her and the next AD we hire calls reporters f'ing scum. Its mind boggling.
Aren't they f'ing scum? :Sly:Common thread: NJ media are scum.
This thing about Hobbs going on a tirade at the end of the call...what led to it? Was he being berated by the SL for an hour and grew frustrated when they tried to cram an agenda up his rear? I can get testy myself when I know I'm being railroaded.
This NJ.com article states there were 10 girls that transferred. I would be interested to know to which schools they transferred. Additionally, are they starting on their new teams; or have they given up the sport. New coach, abilities questioned, no longer a starter, playing less, egos hurt, easier to blame the coach than their own ability as a player; or the fact they were not in shape.
There is nothing unusual about what the softball coach did coming into a new program.
This is why Rutgers loses more than it wins. It doesn't understand what it takes to win at the highest levels of sport.
If the new football coach isn't allowed similar latitudes, we will never win again.
And if they do use similar strategies, they will be on the cover of the SL.
No win situation.
There is nothing unusual about what the softball coach did coming into a new program.
This is why Rutgers loses more than it wins. It doesn't understand what it takes to win at the highest levels of sport.
If the new football coach isn't allowed similar latitudes, we will never win again.
And if they do use similar strategies, they will be on the cover of the SL.
No win situation.
I think Rutgers, on some level does understand what it takes to win, and they try to do that. They just do it ineptly, because the people calling the shots are, as I mentioned in the other thread, f*cking idiots. Moreover, they are universally disastrous in dealing with the media. What kind of dope hands over the narrative like Hobbs did? Apologizing in writing for something said in a phone call is a new level of dumb. He gave the media complete control of the narrative surrounding what was said. Because he apologized, the dopes will believe anything the journalist now claims Hobbs said.
This was a complaint over softball. Softball. The school should have blown it off with a blanket statement "we take all such allegations very seriously, and are looking into it." Then comes Game 7 of the WS, Halloween weekend, and a big fat no one cares.
I thought they just stand their ground.It pretty much tells you why schools like Florida win at everything including softball and why Rutgers is dogshit in so many sports.Our kids go home and cry and hire a lawyer... In Florida your parents send you back to the team with a scolding about not being tough enough.
It pretty much tells you why schools like Florida win at everything including softball and why Rutgers is dogshit in so many sports.Our kids go home and cry and hire a lawyer... In Florida your parents send you back to the team with a scolding about not being tough enough.
unless the public doesn't, and they don't, know what really went down with the reporter and the circumstances--like perhaps their conversation was agreed to be off the recordNot when the article is a hit piece.
As I have aged, I learned that it is always best to not react to bad news right away. Especially, when it appears that someone is trying to bait you or yank your chain. It is best to take at least a day or two, gather facts and respond in a calm and professional manner. Never show the person who is trying to provoke you that you are upset. Had Hobbs followed this approach, and presented such facts, NJ.com would have looked like fools here.
I think Rutgers, on some level does understand what it takes to win, and they try to do that. They just do it ineptly, because the people calling the shots are, as I mentioned in the other thread, f*cking idiots. Moreover, they are universally disastrous in dealing with the media. What kind of dope hands over the narrative like Hobbs did? Apologizing in writing for something said in a phone call is a new level of dumb. He gave the media complete control of the narrative surrounding what was said. Because he apologized, the dopes will believe anything the journalist now claims Hobbs said.
This was a complaint over softball. Softball. The school should have blown it off with a blanket statement "We understand some of the team members who lost their starting jobs when the new coach came aboard have filed a complaint. While we are proud of the success of the new coaching staff, which brought the team from last place to 6th place in a single season, we will obviously not tolerate any abusive conduct from any of our coaches. We take these allegations very seriously, but I am not at liberty to comment any furthe rdue to pending litigation." Then comes Game 7 of the WS, Halloween weekend, and a big fat no one cares.
Millennial coaching requirements:
![]()
Truth.
My pet peeve for 20+ years on this forum has been RU's single-minded inability to control the media narrative, at all, ever, for anything. For an institution of its size, buried in such a highly-charged political environment, the level of "suck" is other-worldly.