I believe it's more like he was part of 3 other people connected with this, no?It's looking more and more like this guy was a just another angry nutjob. Probably got obsessed with ISIS stuff online. His original plan was to kill his family.
I believe it's more like he was part of 3 other people connected with this, no?It's looking more and more like this guy was a just another angry nutjob. Probably got obsessed with ISIS stuff online. His original plan was to kill his family.
The reason they don't label something as terrorism right away is to control the reaction from the public. You can always change the label later when you have more information.stop worrying about offending the killers/terrorists . we all know what this is stop with your crap.
You jump the gun if you want to push a narrative, and that’s exactly what happened here. Fox put forth unconfirmed assertions about the subject’s vehicle and had to retract their initial “reporting” hours later.The reason they don't label something as terrorism right away is to control the reaction from the public. You can always change the label later when you have more information.
Same reason you don't implicate an immigrant because people will go hunt out some poor innocent Arab American if you say it was an immigrant.
The concept is simple you wait until you have the facts rather than go off half cocked making incorrect statements
Yeah ok we all know it’s terrorism. It is what it is. Whatever it is you call it out. This country should no longer play the media games we have seen the las5 few years. The American people are not stupid and will no longer fall for the BS game you are playing.The reason they don't label something as terrorism right away is to control the reaction from the public. You can always change the label later when you have more information.
Same reason you don't implicate an immigrant because people will go hunt out some poor innocent Arab American if you say it was an immigrant.
The concept is simple you wait until you have the facts rather than go off half cocked making incorrect statements
Since you brought it up ragu, did you miss the Ray Epps case against Fox dismissed in federal court? Commonsense Americans weren't fooled by the rigged Dominion suit in a Delaware state court run by a Biden-friendly Demo judge.You jump the gun if you want to push a narrative, and that’s exactly what happened here. Fox put forth unconfirmed assertions about the subject’s vehicle and had to retract their initial “reporting” hours later.
I guess we should be thankful that they summoned the decency to retract. Maybe the sting of the ~800 mm defamation settlement had an effect.
Your point can be a valid one but it is hurt by the fact you have a misattributed quote to George Washington.Did you miss the Ray Epps case against Fox dismissed in federal court? Commonsense Americans weren't fooled by the rigged Dominion suit in a Delaware state court run by a Biden-friendly Demo judge.
Fox News Channel Dominates 2024 Ratings, Secures Largest Audience Share In Nearly A Decade
HAHAHAHAHA already schooled you clowns on the GW "quote".Your point can be a valid one but it is hurt by the fact you have a misattributed quote to George Washington.
I actually missed the response to be honest. Everything I have looked up says there is no direct connection to him. I would love to see the source again.HAHAHAHAHA already schooled you clowns on the GW "quote".
The MercuryHAHAHAHAHA already schooled you clowns on the GW "quote".
Yeah everything is rigged that doesn’t go in your favor. You folks are so delusional it’s pathetic.Since you brought it up ragu, did you miss the Ray Epps case against Fox dismissed in federal court? Commonsense Americans weren't fooled by the rigged Dominion suit in a Delaware state court run by a Biden-friendly Demo judge.
Fox News Channel Dominates 2024 Ratings, Secures Largest Audience Share In Nearly A Decade
No thanks, that previous thread was locked or deleted so I'm not wasting more time. In a nutshell the "quote" was a paraphrase of GW's diary. You can rely on internet web sites about something from the 1700's.I actually missed the response to be honest. Everything I have looked up says there is no direct connection to him. I would love to see the source again.The Mercury
Mount Vernon
politifact
He has many powerful quotes on religion but it does not seem this is a real one.
I actively use items like that as activities in classrooms to have students look up real vs fake quotes. So I would love to see where I am wrong.
Thanks.
LOL let's debate the Dominion ruling in another thread lil' ragu as if you weren't clubbed on that enough already. 😜Yeah everything is rigged that doesn’t go in your favor. You folks are so delusional it’s pathetic.
A paraphrase is very different than a direct quote.....No thanks, that previous thread was locked or deleted so I'm not wasting more time. In a nutshell the "quote" was a paraphrase of GW's diary. You can rely on internet web sites about something from the 1700's.
P.S. I have considered updating my sig with a more complete quote of GW's faith. Stay tuned
I'm good, thanks. This debate can be taken to a new thread, stop trying to derail this one.A paraphrase is very different than a direct quote.....
my bad.I'm good, thanks. This debate can be taken to a new thread, stop trying to derail this one.
yep its pretty obvious and i dont know why he is concentrating on something no one really pushed yesterday beyond the first couple hours of fact finding.Guys, Boss is trying to get this thread either closed or moved to CE by injecting politics, don't bite his bait man
“Nobody really pushed” it because it was proven false quickly. Otherwise it would’ve continued to be pushed just like all the other lies.yep its pretty obvious and i dont know why he is concentrating on something no one really pushed yesterday beyond the first couple hours of fact finding.
Yeah ok we all know it’s terrorism. It is what it is. Whatever it is you call it out. This country should no longer play the media games we have seen the las5 few years. The American people are not stupid and will no longer fall for the BS game you are playing.
Highlighting misrepresentation by a media outlet is hardly “political.” And there are plenty of similar examples in this threadGuys, Boss is trying to get this thread either closed or moved to CE by injecting politics, don't bite his bait man
Riiiiiight 😂Highlighting misrepresentation by a media outlet is hardly “political.” And there are plenty of similar examples in this thread
That's a ridiculous assertion considering you have no way of knowing "all" of what those agencies do, seeing as how most of it is never made public.Have you been out of the country or maybe in a sub for the last 6 years? Pretty much all these agencies do is get stuff wrong.
OK start another thread where we can highlight all the media "misrepresentations" in recent years and keep it apolitical. Thanks ragu.Highlighting misrepresentation by a media outlet is hardly “political.” And there are plenty of similar examples in this thread
Highlighting misrepresentation by a media outlet is hardly “political.” And there are plenty of similar examples in this thread
do you really want to make a list, if so come to the other board and we will discuss like real menHighlighting misrepresentation by a media outlet is hardly “political.” And there are plenty of similar examples in this thread
boy its going to be a rough 4 years for you“Nobody really pushed” it because it was proven false quickly. Otherwise it would’ve continued to be pushed just like all the other lies.
Yeah, that's what the other board is all about. Real men. 🤣 🤣 🤣do you really want to make a list, if so come to the other board and we will discuss like real men
#FakeNewsThe entire first page was them defending Fox and now they're still melting down over the 787M.
No thanks, that previous thread was locked or deleted so I'm not wasting more time. In a nutshell the "quote" was a paraphrase of GW's diary. You can rely on internet web sites about something from the 1700's.
P.S. I have considered updating my sig with a more complete quote of GW's faith. Stay tuned
maybe I should say ones whose posting accounts here arent controlled by their wivesYeah, that's what the other board is all about. Real men. 🤣 🤣 🤣
I've blasted you all over the free boards clown. As I said earlier, feel free to start a new thread about GW's faith and I'll curb stomp you there again too.OK. So it's a 'paraphrase' not a quote. Why use quotation marks???
Let me guess: You are angling for the coveted 4th board slot on the CE Board Chess Team now that @ProudNJSportsfan died of C19?
Am I right, lowIQanon?
Glad I did a sweet, cool NYD morning mountain bike ride instead of reading the blathering idiocy that the mods had to delete about this terrorist attack.
A paraphrase is not a quote. A paraphrase is left up to your own interpretation of what you wanted something to say.No thanks, that previous thread was locked or deleted so I'm not wasting more time. In a nutshell the "quote" was a paraphrase of GW's diary. You can rely on internet web sites about something from the 1700's.
P.S. I have considered updating my sig with a more complete quote of GW's faith. Stay tuned
I'm on solid ground with my faith, thanks for your concern. As I had already pointed out to you bozos earlier on this, all you have are internet websites claiming they can't confirm something from the 1700's that fits the character of GW 100%. Keep obsessing about it though lol.A paraphrase is not a quote. A paraphrase is left up to your own interpretation of what you wanted something to say.
People do this with the Bible all the time, focusing in on certain parts while completely ignoring others so they can pick and choose their own narrative.
The good news is God knows what you’re doing and see’s right through it. And if you believe then eventually you’ll meet you maker and have some splainin’ to do😉
The idea of acting ‘like real men’ being writing an anonymous post on a college football message board is among the silliest things I’ve ever seen.do you really want to make a list, if so come to the other board and we will discuss like real men
Mhm god knows what you’re doing bud. You really aren’t slick👍🏾I'm on solid ground with my faith, thanks for your concern. As I had already pointed out to you bozos earlier on this, all you have are internet websites claiming they can't confirm something from the 1700's that fits the character of GW 100%. Keep obsessing about it though lol.
A rough 4 years for the country.boy its going to be a rough 4 years for you
You could be in that category but you’d have to get a girlfriend first. 😂maybe I should say ones whose posting accounts here arent controlled by their wives