ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Kentucky fans call for Wimsatt to start

As it should be. AK is proving he's not the answer ( at least it has looked that way the last two games)
Surprising take from you. Throw out Nebraska. Both QBs had poor numbers in extremely windy and hot conditions. Raiola was under 50% passing when he is usually in the mid 70s. Raiola had fewer passing yards in the second half than their punter.
Yes, the Wisconsin game was concerning, but to conclude "he's not the answer" is premature (and you kind of covered yourself with "looked that way").
If he craps the bed the next 2 games, I'm with you.
Frankly, hoped he had found another QB in the portal. AK was too easy of a move for RU. Wonder if they tried for others and had to settle on AK.
 
Surprising take from you. Throw out Nebraska. Both QBs had poor numbers in extremely windy and hot conditions. Raiola was under 50% passing when he is usually in the mid 70s. Raiola had fewer passing yards in the second half than their punter.
Yes, the Wisconsin game was concerning, but to conclude "he's not the answer" is premature (and you kind of covered yourself with "looked that way").
If he craps the bed the next 2 games, I'm with you.
Frankly, hoped he had found another QB in the portal. AK was too easy of a move for RU. Wonder if they tried for others and had to settle on AK.
AK isn't the answer if the passing game has to carry the offense.
He's a complementary piece to keep the opposing D from keying too much on the running game .
We can point out the opponent's QB's game , but how AK played is what matters and overcoming
the weather is part of what experienced QBs are expected to do of they are to be considered a good one.
AK is a serviceable QB that can't take over a game and one that will limit mistakes and is expected to be good enough to make the opposition respect RU's passing game enough do the running game has a chance to do a lot of damage.
Against Nebraska and Wisconsin Rutgers passing game didn't do the job and the running game couldn't
play its best.
AK shouldn't be given a pass just because the true freshman playing for the opponant had a bad game to because of weather conditions
He needs to step up and use his experience in every situation for Rutgers to have a chance of beating good teams .
 
GW would have given us a better chance to win vs Nebraska. Wisconsin was a lost cause, Rutgers played very poorly all around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ashokan
AK isn't the answer if the passing game has to carry the offense.
He's a complementary piece to keep the opposing D from keying too much on the running game .
We can point out the opponent's QB's game , but how AK played is what matters and overcoming
the weather is part of what experienced QBs are expected to do of they are to be considered a good one.
AK is a serviceable QB that can't take over a game and one that will limit mistakes and is expected to be good enough to make the opposition respect RU's passing game enough do the running game has a chance to do a lot of damage.
Against Nebraska and Wisconsin Rutgers passing game didn't do the job and the running game couldn't
play its best.
AK shouldn't be given a pass just because the true freshman playing for the opponant had a bad game to because of weather conditions
He needs to step up and use his experience in every situation for Rutgers to have a chance of beating good teams .
Frankly, you are way off base on the Nebraska game. I was there. It was hotter than hell in the stands, and it was hotter on the field. Sustained 20-25 mph winds with gusts 35-40 mph.
True Freshman? Ha, ha. He has a 67% completion percentage (including the Rutgers game) but completed only 48% in the Rutgers game. That tells you something- the conditions were unfavorable for a passing game.

 
  • Like
Reactions: TRU2RU
Everyone wants air raid but a solid ground and pound works too.

True.
But any offensive system could work.
It's about feasibility.

If you told me, Rutgers could go 10-2 running the ball 60 times a game, smash mouth football in the Big Ten against PSU, OSU, UM (normally) and Oregon sign me up!
Run all the meathead boring plays you want!

But how feasible is that?
We've been trying it for 10 years.
All we hear is how we don't have the talent to compete and never will.

Okay - so wouldn't we need an offense that accounts for that?
Just because something works for someone else doesn't mean it'll work for us.

The problem is many (perhaps even HC Schiano also) have a predisposed notion of how the offense "should" look and don't care about feasibility or likelihood of success in our particular situation.
 
I sit here and just wish GW had gotten his accuracy together because we would be 6-0 right now at Rutgers , GW would have been lights out and we would not have so many injuries on defense . makes me so mad but we still have AJ who can run and pass with accuracy so next season is his to take , come on kid .
 
Second game in a row at Kentucky, where the freshman is now the second string QB.

Cutter Boley: 20/38 (52.6%) 2 TD/2 INT

Gavin: 12/30 for 162 yards (40%) 1 TD/3 INT


 
  • Like
Reactions: TRU2RU
AK isn't the answer if the passing game has to carry the offense.
He's a complementary piece to keep the opposing D from keying too much on the running game .
We can point out the opponent's QB's game , but how AK played is what matters and overcoming
the weather is part of what experienced QBs are expected to do of they are to be considered a good one.
AK is a serviceable QB that can't take over a game and one that will limit mistakes and is expected to be good enough to make the opposition respect RU's passing game enough do the running game has a chance to do a lot of damage.
Against Nebraska and Wisconsin Rutgers passing game didn't do the job and the running game couldn't
play its best.
AK shouldn't be given a pass just because the true freshman playing for the opponant had a bad game to because of weather conditions
He needs to step up and use his experience in every situation for Rutgers to have a chance of beating good teams .
This shows how little you know about football & QB
 
  • Like
Reactions: SBP and RUTGERS95
Second game in a row at Kentucky, where the freshman is now the second string QB.

Cutter Boley: 20/38 (52.6%) 2 TD/2 INT

Gavin: 12/30 for 162 yards (40%) 1 TD/3 INT


not surprised
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
Athan is better and I was a gw guy. No way gw has the accuracy if athan or th touch.
 
Nothing but good wishes for Gavin, and thought he did okay here. I was apprehensive about Athan especially early on but now I can't praise him enough. The man is a great QB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRU2RU
Pass protection was awesome today. KM is a beast at the blitz pickup
 
Athan is better and I was a gw guy. No way gw has the accuracy if athan or th touch.

AK was mediocre at Minn and he was mediocre first part of RU season.
He had games of 40.5 50.5 and 37.5 accuracy - that was with much better WRs.

AK did step-up his game a lot and became a good QB when RU had to alter the horrible passing game.
RU and Minn both used the "play not to lose" passing game when AK was mediocre.
RU coaches very good at coaching some positions but they give away that they are bad at QBs and passing offense.
If Mongo never got hurt AK would have had more bad games because RU wasn't scaring an secondaries or DCs.
 
AK performance will bring in better QB and receivers in the future. Rutgers will no longer be considered only a running team.

Flood started this run only offense and I use to said that Flood wanted to punt on second down so the defense can win the game. I stopped watching Rutgers football due to Flood.
 
AK performance will bring in better QB and receivers in the future. Rutgers will no longer be considered only a running team.

Flood started this run only offense and I use to said that Flood wanted to punt on second down so the defense can win the game. I stopped watching Rutgers football due to Flood.
Wow what a fortuitous decision… your decision, regardless of how bad Flood was, allowed you to avoid the Ash shit show. Lucky you 🤣
 
AK performance will bring in better QB and receivers in the future. Rutgers will no longer be considered only a running team.

Flood started this run only offense and I use to said that Flood wanted to punt on second down so the defense can win the game. I stopped watching Rutgers football due to Flood.

Wasn''t Leonte Carroo a Flood player? And Nova? Didn't Brandon Coleman catch a lot of passes under Flood and make it to the NFL?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUTGERS95
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT