I think his point was "if you are going to trim anyways". In which case I could have just trimmed prior to the dip.if the price drops then writing covered calls was a good move.
I think his point was "if you are going to trim anyways". In which case I could have just trimmed prior to the dip.if the price drops then writing covered calls was a good move.
You don't limit your upside - you lose money selling calls on a stock whose value increases
Show your math. Don’t bother because you are wrong.
The ONLY reason you write cover calls is to collect the perm. If you are writing naked calls, you are taking directional risk.It would depend on the premium of the written call, implied volatility, etc. Most people don't sell covered calls just to collect the premium. You could end up really regretting it. An example would be the following. If you purchased ABC at $10 and plan to sell it at $20. If you say to yourself, well I am planning to sell it at $20, so why not make a little extra and write a covered call. But there is usually a reason that a stock would jump, perhaps a catalyst such as strong earnings or a new product which will make the company lots of money. At which point, you would typically say, no way I would sell it at $20, but in a covered call situation, you would have no choice.
Real life example would be a stock like AMC. If you bought at $10 and plan to sell at $20. Yes you even collect $1 premium, but you would miss out on the further upswing. Remember, for most stocks in most times, there is a reason the stock moves up.
If your talking covered calls that's different, but selling a call reduces value as stock price increases.Show your math. Don’t bother because you are wrong.
I personally consider missed opportunity cost as a loss.Again, you don’t lose money. You just make less.
I thought he said he wanted to trim only at a higher stock price.It’s math. If you collect $1 prem and the stock dropped by $2 vswhere you could’ve sold, not good.
Agreed. To write naked calls, you have to have a very strong conviction that the stock is not going up.The ONLY reason you write cover calls is to collect the perm. If you are writing naked calls, you are taking directional risk.
Yes, writing naked calls is essentially a short position with limited upside.If your talking covered calls that's different, but selling a call reduces value as stock price increases.
Edit: and that's a pretty dick response considering I wasn't the one wrong
It is interesting the different perception the WSB's crowd has on stock issuance compared to traditional WS.AMC issuing more shares and go direct to retail. Taking a page out of GME. Only way to sell this stock.
So here's a question regarding selling calls.
Say I own a couple hundred shares of a stock, and I want to sell.
Could I not sell calls for a couple days/weeks out at a slightly higher then current price, and if it hits great I got the higher price plus the option premium? And if it doesn't hit I at least got the option premium?
Please explain the SEC violations.Who would have thought the market manipulation would continue and now the AMC CEO is buddies with the Reddit crew. The SEC is full of incompetent knuckleheads.
They are issuing more shares. Smart move by mgmt but hurts current equity holders.Just noticed AMC dropped to 46 and trading was halted.
Is it a short squeeze or a equity raise? LOLIt is interesting the different perception the WSB's crowd has on stock issuance compared to traditional WS.
WS see's it as dillution and reason for the per share price to come down. WSB see's it as good for the company and thus reason for the share price to go up. Are they just rationalizing anything that happens as positive? Maybe but it is true that if AMC had any hope of surviving they needed to raise cash, and they are doing that.
Granted nothing can rationalize the current share price of AMC, but just the general perception of these stock issuances as good can be rationalized. .
Honestly, if you're looking to a message board for this info, you may as well light your money on fire and save yourself the middlemen.So is the "open/close" option as part of selling a call talking about the transaction happening at the open or the close of the market?
Or something else?
The short squeeze is only part of the story obviously. It was much more of a story with GME when it was short 140% of the float or whatever % it was. But it's grown into more then just squeezing the shorts. Not that any of it is all that smart.Is it a short squeeze or a equity raise? LOL
Can’t be a short squeeze when the company is issuing stock like the dot com era.
Whatever.Honestly, if you're looking to a message board for this info, you may as well light your money on fire and save yourself the middlemen.
Ya, just looking to dip a toe in currently. Thanks on the 1st bold, that was a question I had. And thanks on the 2nd bold as that was something I had not considered. Going naked seems like something I would never get into.I think you understand what you are doing 05. I agree with you that if you think that a stock has had a good run, has maybe a little left, why not get paid an option premium to sell it at an even higher price. If it doesn't reach that price over the defined time period, you pocket the premium. If it does, you get the defined strike price, but forego further appreciation. One other consideration is that the call option will not be executed as soon as it reaches the strike price. Makes no sense as there is still time value to the holder. So, you may end up in the position where the stock is trading well above where you are willing to sell it, but you don't want to become naked by selling the underlying stock, and then bad news hits and the stock dives before the option expires. You keep the premium obviously, but missed the opportunity to sell at an attractive price. To get around this, you would need to close out the call option before expiration which would be buying the same call option which would require you paying a premium. My only advice is don't go naked.
You're right.Whatever.
I’m sure the SEC could put together a manipulation case. There is only 1 reason the WSB crew is working in concert and that’s to drive the price up and screw whichever idiot is left holding the bag. GameStop = dying B&M store chain…AMC = struggling theater chain…BBBY = struggling retailer. If the WSB crew was actually interested in making investments they don’t need an army. FWIW, I don’t care about it one way or another but I think it’s bad for the market. Just like the Roaring Kitty nonsense. He could have bought GameStop and kept his mouth shut. But he decided to jump all over the internet for the sole purpose of driving up the price.Please explain the SEC violations.
I’m sure the SEC could put together a manipulation case. There is only 1 reason the WSB crew is working in concert and that’s to drive the price up and screw whichever idiot is left holding the bag. GameStop = dying B&M store chain…AMC = struggling theater chain…BBBY = struggling retailer. If the WSB crew was actually interested in making investments they don’t need an army. FWIW, I don’t care about it one way or another but I think it’s bad for the market. Just like the Roaring Kitty nonsense. He could have bought GameStop and kept his mouth shut. But he decided to jump all over the internet for the sole purpose of driving up the price.
I getcha. The WSB "individual investors" aren't really covered by SEC/FINRA rules, but the firms they trade through are subject to them. Regulators are more likely to fine Robin Hood for market manipulation than the individuals. Personally, I'm curious to see the mechanics of how these partial share orders are filled outside of market hours and how the firm accounts for margin vs cash accounts.I’m sure the SEC could put together a manipulation case. There is only 1 reason the WSB crew is working in concert and that’s to drive the price up and screw whichever idiot is left holding the bag. GameStop = dying B&M store chain…AMC = struggling theater chain…BBBY = struggling retailer. If the WSB crew was actually interested in making investments they don’t need an army. FWIW, I don’t care about it one way or another but I think it’s bad for the market. Just like the Roaring Kitty nonsense. He could have bought GameStop and kept his mouth shut. But he decided to jump all over the internet for the sole purpose of driving up the price.
But it's also cool to see the small guys making a killing trying to screw over the big guys. LOL.
Just wondering base on some of your earlier responses, do you work in the industry?Honestly, if you're looking to a message board for this info, you may as well light your money on fire and save yourself the middlemen.
He’s definitely done the right thing for AMC but there will be a lot of individual investors that get burned. But, that’s on them.The AMC CEO has done the right thing to date. Issue shares when priced well beyond intrinsic value and use the proceeds to reduce debt and make any needed capital expenditures to the company’s existing asset base. If the shares continue to stay at these prices, he should keep issuing and use the cash to fund acquisitions to diversify away from what I think is an industry in secular decline. One of the least appreciated roles of a CEO is capital allocation. This should result in a HBS case study in capital allocation, similar to the famed Henry Singleton.
Yes, I work for a firm in the financial industry. Mostly getting the morning coffee for the smart guys though. lolJust wondering base on some of your earlier responses, do you work in the industry?
You really need to read a beginner’s book on options. Very difficult to reach options trading over a message board. Open/close have nothing to do with market open close. It relates to opening and closing your position.So is the "open/close" option as part of selling a call talking about the transaction happening at the open or the close of the market?
Or something else?
Tesla with a quick drop of 4% over the last hour. Somebody dumping their shares? But, volume does not seem out of whack.
Ford up big (over 7%) on relatively high volume. Not shocked with the TSLA slide this year as it was grossly overvalued, but very pleased (and surprised) with big the Ford rally. With a cost basis below $8, I’m thinking of taking some off the table.
I hear what you guys are saying, but this board allows me to find answers to questions as I happen upon them.You really need to read a beginner’s book on options. Very difficult to reach options trading over a message board. Open/close have nothing to do with market open close. It relates to opening and closing your position.
My first dozen or so option trades were on paper, so I could see the mechanics of how it worked in a volatile market before risking actual capital.And look my first options trade isn't going to be a couple hundred naked call options of AMC.
It's going to be an inconsequential trade which I might earn a $50 premium on in a couple weeks. v
Now could guys be pulling my chain, or just plain wrong(not sure where RuJohnny falls above)? Ya, for sure, but I've gotten some pretty good info here over the last year so I'm willing to throw the question out there and see what comes back.
He’s definitely done the right thing for AMC but there will be a lot of individual investors that get burned. But, that’s on them.
AMC was down 30%, then up 10%, and ended down 18%. What fun! :)You mean the ones who bought yesterday and are now down 28%. Or the GME buyers down 14%?
AMC was down 30%, then up 10%, and ended down 18%. What fun! :)