Short sellers are evil. :)That sure is stickin' it to the man.
Short sellers are evil. :)That sure is stickin' it to the man.
WSB aren’t investors they are gamblers. Which is fine other than it creates headlines that make the entire market look like a circus. Here’s a hypothetical - what if during half-time of the next sold out RU/PSU game Schiano made a public announcement that he’s a football coach not a financial advisor but that everyone should buy as many shares as they can of NewCo when the stock market opens Monday morning because it’s a great company with a bright future. Schiano owns 100,000 shares at the time. Any problem with this scenario?That sure is stickin' it to the man.
WSB aren’t investors they are gamblers. Which is fine other than it creates headlines that make the entire market look like a circus. Here’s a hypothetical - what if during half-time of the next sold out RU/PSU game Schiano made a public announcement that he’s a football coach not a financial advisor but that everyone should buy as many shares as they can of NewCo when the stock market opens Monday morning because it’s a great company with a bright future. Schiano owns 100,000 shares at the time. Any problem with this scenario?
Younger, perhaps less educated or informed, people will come to view the sagas of GME and AMC as capitalism. This is a terrible misrepresentation of capitalism, of course, and may foster acceptance of other forms of economic organization.
I fear these meme stocks, and crypto, are destructive to healthy perception of the benefits of capitalism.
I don’t buy the “stick it to the Man” crap. That was the angle Roaring Kitty was playing in his attempt to avoid a pump-and-dump scheme. Not sure why anyone really believes it.I'd say if they're willing to lose money to "stick it to the man" they're already acolytes of other forms of economic organization. Almost an Occupy Wall Street in the era of social media ascendancy and zero commissions.
He raised almost $600m today. No brainer.If I’m the CEO of AMC, I keep issuing. It’s like a printing press. Use the cash to pay down the debt and sit on a portion to buy back the stock when it’s in the teens.
Just imagine where the stock could have traded if they didn’t sell those shares. He needs to do more. I’m happy since I covered some of my shorts at 42% gain. Puts are still way out of the money.He raised almost $600m today. No brainer.
Right on queueHe raised almost $600m today. No brainer.
I don’t see this ending well for Aron. He’s apparently made over $100M+ through all of these maneuvers. If AMC doesn’t turn around the business there will be no shortage of lawsuits.Raised $600 million and never put on pants.
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
But he did disclose that you could lose all your investment by buying the stock. It’s not his fault people want to stick it to the man or help him get richer. Investors do get free popcorn with those shares.I don’t see this ending well for Aron. He’s apparently made over $100M+ through all of these maneuvers. If AMC doesn’t turn around the business there will be no shortage of lawsuits.
I don’t see this ending well for Aron. He’s apparently made over $100M+ through all of these maneuvers. If AMC doesn’t turn around the business there will be no shortage of lawsuits.
If the stock/company tanks, Plaintiffs lawyers will jump all over this especially when retail gamblers start crying about how they took out a second mortgage to buy AMC stock or lost their kid’s college savings. I think Aron is playing with fire but he’s clearly willing to let it ride. Like I’ve said before, I don’t have an issue with this nonsense and the WSB gamblers, but the headlines make the market look like a circus.But he did disclose that you could lose all your investment by buying the stock. It’s not his fault people want to stick it to the man or help him get richer. Investors do get free popcorn with those shares.
I don't recall many of these suits being successful in the dot com era. Self directed investors don't make out well in arbitration. Also, I can't imagine a securities lawyer picking up all these $25,000 cases from busted Robin Hood accounts. There's plenty of pissed off full service clients who were told to sell Apple and Tesla a few doubles ago. LOLIf the stock/company tanks, Plaintiffs lawyers will jump all over this especially when retail gamblers start crying about how they took out a second mortgage to buy AMC stock or lost their kid’s college savings. I think Aron is playing with fire but he’s clearly willing to let it ride. Like I’ve said before, I don’t have an issue with this nonsense and the WSB gamblers, but the headlines make the market look like a circus.
I don't recall many of these suits being successful in the dot com era. Self directed investors don't make out well in arbitration. Also, I can't imagine a securities lawyer picking up all these $25,000 cases from busted Robin Hood accounts. There's plenty of pissed off full service clients who were told to sell Apple and Tesla a few doubles ago. LOL
Example: A senior client has $3 million Apple stock that is most of her account with a cost basis of $15,000. The brokerage firm has maintained a "Strong buy" on Apple for several years. In 2018, her broker recommends selling a third of the position and reallocating it into a 60/30/10 allocation, with the equity in 60/30/10 Large/SMid/Int'l. The client passes in March 2020, now one of the 3 heirs hire a lawyer who wants to know why the broker recommended selling a stock that the firm recommended buying, has since tripled, and put the proceeds into "risky" investments that have lost money. Fun! LOLThe Apple and Tesla investors didn't LOSE money, just didn't make as much. Apples and oranges😉. And no securities lawyer would represent a single Robin Hood investor. It would be a class.
Example: A senior client has $3 million Apple stock that is most of her account with a cost basis of $15,000. The brokerage firm has maintained a "Strong buy" on Apple for several years. In 2018, her broker recommends selling a third of the position and reallocating it into a 60/30/10 allocation, with the equity in 60/30/10 Large/SMid/Int'l. The client passes in March 2020, now one of the 3 heirs hire a lawyer who wants to know why the broker recommended selling a stock that the firm recommended buying, has since tripled, and put the proceeds into "risky" investments that have lost money. Fun! LOL
I looked up Apples historical price and it was about 25 cents in 2000 and at current price of $125 went up 500%.Example: A senior client has $3 million Apple stock that is most of her account with a cost basis of $15,000. The brokerage firm has maintained a "Strong buy" on Apple for several years. In 2018, her broker recommends selling a third of the position and reallocating it into a 60/30/10 allocation, with the equity in 60/30/10 Large/SMid/Int'l. The client passes in March 2020, now one of the 3 heirs hire a lawyer who wants to know why the broker recommended selling a stock that the firm recommended buying, has since tripled, and put the proceeds into "risky" investments that have lost money. Fun! LOL
Yeah, it was 31 cents the day my son was born. If only I put $400 into it that day, I could have paid his 4 years of college. That day happened to be the day Worldcom imploded. Guess which company I had money in? LOLI looked up Apples historical price and it was about 25 cents in 2000 and at current price of $125 went up 500%.
It's a hypothetical, but in this situation a lawyer will ask for damages of $205,000 because $100,000 of the $3 million that went from Apple into an international fund that lost 5% instead of tripled, and claim the broker was churning a senior client's account into inappropriate investments that she did not understand. And then settle for $10,000. SMH.Diversification would be the easy and, I believe, effective answer. The problem for them will be the "risky" investments (if they are indeed risky) that lost money. Did they diversify into investments that the company didn't rate "strong buy"?
It's a hypothetical, but in this situation a lawyer will ask for damages of $205,000 because $100,000 of the $3 million that went from Apple into an international fund that lost 5% instead of tripled, and claim the broker was churning a senior client's account into inappropriate investments that she did not understand. And then settle for $10,000. SMH.
this reminds me that E-trade has a thing where you can do simulated trades.My first dozen or so option trades were on paper, so I could see the mechanics of how it worked in a volatile market before risking actual capital.
You're betting on a market direction in a certain timeframe. It's basically craps.
That would be 50,000%. if it went to $1.25, it would be 500%I looked up Apples historical price and it was about 25 cents in 2000 and at current price of $125 went up 500%.
Nice way to end the week! 👍
LOL…bunch of AMC executives dumping shares. S4s filed after market closed. Making their beloved retail investors look like morons.Yeah, those Wednesday GME and ACE buyers really got to stick it to the man.
Don’t own any stocks in anything, but from a country boy point of view, it sure looks like Tractor Supply stores and Boot Barn are thriving through corona. Tractor Supply closing in on 2,000 stores including one opening this Summer in Toms River and Boot Barn is finally tackling the Northeast.
Tom, Tractor Supply is everything except supplies for a Tractor lol. Everything you mentioned plus clothing, toys, pet supplies, and at certain times of the year, you can purchase live animals.
I’m shocked. These guys just hit the lotto. I wonder if they did the same as GME. Dump their shares as part of the equity issuance.LOL…bunch of AMC executives dumping shares. S4s filed after market closed. Making their beloved retail investors look like morons.
I will have to stop in the one off of 195. I have used their parking lot as a meeting place but never went insideTom, Tractor Supply is everything except supplies for a Tractor lol. Everything you mentioned plus clothing, toys, pet supplies, and at certain times of the year, you can purchase live animals. The pet supply portion includes horses, cats, dogs, rabbits, squirrels, hamsters, birds, etc. I don’t think I am their typical customer, but I mostly stick to buying jeans, Western style shirts, socks, and they sell soda for $1 a liter. One area where I would have spent more money on at TS would have been on cowboy hats and boots. They have a very small selection in both. Would love to see them and Boot Barn build stores together side by side. Boot Barn could take care of the Boot market that a lot of Tractor Supply customers are interested in. The stores would feed off each other in my opinion. The one I currently go to is right near the New Jersey Horse Park in Upper Freehold/Allentown just off I-195. They have stores all over the state now. By the way, for those of you, especially with children, looking for a fun, Free day, the New Jersey Horse Park Offers Free parking and about 90 percent of the shows are Free. You can also bring your own food and drink.
No need to research I never but individual stocksYou've got interesting idea. So now you do your research.
No need to research I never but individual stocks