Chicken littles and bears! Great buying opportunity for the common sense investors.geez, who pulled the rug out?
I wouldn't be so quick to label sellers. If inflation is more than transitory, there'll be some growth stock pain for a awhile.Chicken littles and bears! Great buying opportunity for the common sense investors.
With a long time horizon, it's buy, buy, buy, especially since so many companies continue to crush earnings which normally rule the day.I wouldn't be so quick to label sellers. If inflation is more than transitory, there'll be some growth stock pain for a awhile.
Not to get too complicated, but most online brokerages now allow for the purchase of fractional shares.I am looking to buy some stock. but I am not sure where to go nowadays. I already have a fairly well diversified portfolio of around 400 k. I don’t want to buy stocks above $500 a share. Any recommendations for lower priced stocks say $10-$50 a share? I am more comfortable there.
I am looking to buy some stock. but I am not sure where to go nowadays. I already have a fairly well diversified portfolio of around 400 k. I don’t want to buy stocks above $500 a share. Any recommendations for lower priced stocks say $10-$50 a share? I am more comfortable there.
Not a good way to select stocks. A price of a stock has nothing to do with value and vice versa.I am looking to buy some stock. but I am not sure where to go nowadays. I already have a fairly well diversified portfolio of around 400 k. I don’t want to buy stocks above $500 a share. Any recommendations for lower priced stocks say $10-$50 a share? I am more comfortable there.
agree 100%. it’s part of the equation in conjunction with the number of shares outstanding, earnings and earnings growth potential. I have heard many times from people that say they don’t buy a stock because the price is too high. The best example for Southern would be that: is a company’s stock cheaper when they do a 5 for 1 stock split when they have a $1 million shares outstanding at a $100 a share for a market cap of $100 million? The answer is no. In this scenario, after a 5 for 1 split, the stock price is lower (now $20 a share), but with 5 million shares now outstanding, the company has same market cap of $100 million. I don’t even focus on the actual share price, I look at price to earrings ratio (among other metrics). I generally have a fixed dollar amount that I like to use for each time I buy a new stock or add to a current stock, and just divide that amount by the current price to determine the number of shares to buy. I don’t care if it’s $500 a share where I get 10 shares or $50 a share where I get 100 shares.Not a good way to select stocks. A price of a stock has nothing to do with value and vice versa.
PYPL was in the red but held up decently and V, MA finished green yesterday. Think I'm gonna wait on PYPL and let it play out a bit more.geez, who pulled the rug out?
Lots of competition in the streaming space. Disney has also been doing some weird things with their theme parks and impacting guest experiences.Disney earnings miss and slowing growth at Disney+....blip or trend? Pandemic streaming surge wearing off? Down about 5% premarket. In that area it's about 20% off the highs from last spring.
Disney makes the trend clear: Growth is slowing for streaming services
Disney, WarnerMedia and ViacomCBS all added subscribers in the third quarter, but streaming growth slowed from the prior quarter.www.cnbc.com
Yea I think international travel opening up might help the theme parks and such but streaming subscriber growth is a key metric for them. All the streaming services are showing slower growth except Netflix which had a bounce back after last qtrs lower numbers. There is competition but if it's across the board essentially it's likely pandemic surge wearing off.Lots of competition in the streaming space. Disney has also been doing some weird things with their theme parks and impacting guest experiences.
Disney was the poster-child for the retail investor debacle during COVID. The stock had a monster run even when the parks were closed, cruise ships docked, no sports for ESPN, and it was losing money on D+. But every retailer knows the name so it was buy, buy, buy.Lots of competition in the streaming space. Disney has also been doing some weird things with their theme parks and impacting guest experiences.
Practically all stocks have had a monster run. I mentioned back then, 80s area might be a place to nibble and it bottomed just around that area IIRC..high 70s. Their Disney+ subscriber growth numbers are what boosted the stock and at least some of that will be sticky. At one time it was ESPN subscriber losses that hit the stock, now it's Disney+ subscriber growth that buoys the stock....at least until now. Their theme parks and the like should do better now with international travel open and increased vaccinations among children.Disney was the poster-child for the retail investor debacle during COVID. The stock had a monster run even when the parks were closed, cruise ships docked, no sports for ESPN, and it was losing money on D+. But every retailer knows the name so it was buy, buy, buy.
Star Wars and Marvel are probably the best 2 franchises in the cinematic world right now, but it's still not enough content to fill the need. Disney needs to fill the gaps with some fun Netflix's level stuff. Hell, do a family scavenger hut race around Disney World and some reality crap like that. Nice cheap budget and it provides content.Practically all stocks have had a monster run. I mentioned back then, 80s area might be a place to nibble and it bottomed just around that area IIRC..high 70s. Their Disney+ subscriber growth numbers are what boosted the stock and at least some of that will be sticky. At one time it was ESPN subscriber losses that hit the stock, now it's Disney+ subscriber growth that buoys the stock....at least until now. Their theme parks and the like should do better now with international travel open and increased vaccinations among children.
The pandemic surge on streaming is wearing off. I think competition isn't really a big deal in that space for them, Netflix is their biggest competitor but after that no one comes close and probably won't considering all the franchises they have control of. What they need to do is put out a lot more content and some will hit and some will miss just like Netflix. That's suppose to come end of next year. I have no idea how it will materialize but interactive media could be something that offers a sort of unique potential for them too.
Also they need to broaden their content as well. It's family friendly which is fine but you're not gonna get a Squid Game under the Disney umbrella so you need to have an avenue to distribute that kind of content and get those subscribers. IMO it can't be all Star Wars/Marvel etc...There's a saturation point to that kind of stuff IMO. It works and has appeal to a degree but it's not enough on its own. Hotstar is a service they have in Asia but not sure how much money they make on that even if they get growth their. It's US subs that are the most important at least for now.
Bob Iger is a hard act to follow. An excellent CEO and one of the best out there in general. Not sure about this new guy Chapek. I'm that retail guy who likes a name like Disney and I'm willing to be a knife catcher for names like these but depends on the price as always.
Disney needs to just buy and own Hulu already to compete at Netflix's level to put our riskier programming. You cannot operate on a family friendly platform such as Disney+ alone for content for the massesStar Wars and Marvel are probably the best 2 franchises in the cinematic world right now, but it's still not enough content to fill the need. Disney needs to fill the gaps with some fun Netflix's level stuff. Hell, do a family scavenger hut race around Disney World and some reality crap like that. Nice cheap budget and it provides content.
Personally, I think he's throwing a bone to the far left. He has a massive tax bill coming regardless of what the Twitter poll decided, and I have to think he knew what the results of the poll were going to be. Of course, I could be completely wrong.Musk is a genius when it comes to dealing media. Love how he dictated the message on the stock sale. Of course it would’ve been great if the poll said to not sell. That would’ve been funny.
Personally, I think he's throwing a bone to the far left. He has a massive tax bill coming regardless of what the Twitter poll decided, and I have to think he knew what the results of the poll were going to be. Of course, I could be completely wrong.
I would have said QS a month ago when it was on saleAnyone know any good quantum/forever battery plays?
I am looking to buy some stock. but I am not sure where to go nowadays. I already have a fairly well diversified portfolio of around 400 k. I don’t want to buy stocks above $500 a share. Any recommendations for lower priced stocks say $10-$50 a share? I am more comfortable there.
The options game is out of my wheelhouse, but, Rob Mauer, who does the Tesla Daily podcast said according to the SEC filing, he sold "core shares" on Tues and Wed. (~3.6 million shares) and he would have to pay capital gains tax on these shares. Mauer was puzzled as to why he opted to sell these core shares.At worst you're only partially right. Standard operating procedure when one exercises a block of non-qualified stock options is to sell enough immediately to cover exercise cost and withholding. No capital gains that way. If that wasn't done he would be on the hook to pay Tesla over a billion dollars in cash. Now getting it up to 10% probably had some game playing to it.
Speaking about breakups, good article on GE:
5 Charts on General Electric's Fall From Grace
Companies at the top don't stay that way forever.www.morningstar.com
The options game is out of my wheelhouse, but, Rob Mauer, who does the Tesla Daily podcast said according to the SEC filing, he sold "core shares" on Tues and Wed. (~3.6 million shares) and he would have to pay capital gains tax on these shares. Mauer was puzzled as to why he opted to sell these core shares.
We are at 2 days a week in the office, but still flexible depending on your unique needs (pharma/biotech). Obviously, if you work in a lab, you need to be in full-time because you can't bring your lab home.My company is 3 days in the office and 2 remote per week. They just announced this will be extended until the end of 2022. They are also expecting us to travel to see clients face to face.
additionally, they would like to try and get 50% capacity on any given day for time in the office.
Lucid on quite a roll today. LCID needs to have its ridiculous valuation match Rivian's even more absurd evaluation.
Not going anywhere, will buy the dip.....whenever it happens:I'm close to pulling out of the mkts for a bit, another few weeks and then I see pain
Lucid is valued more than Ford and 2 analysts said there may be no sky to the upcoming valuations. They made 235k on one battery deal this year. That should scare everyoneNot going anywhere, will buy the dip.....whenever it happens:
“Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections, or trying to anticipate corrections, than has been lost in corrections themselves.” - PL
It scares me enough not to buy Lucid or Rivian, but overall, most top companies are crushing earnings quarter after quarter.Lucid is valued more than Ford and 2 analysts said there may be no sky to the upcoming valuations. They made 235k on one battery deal this year. That should scare everyone