ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Stock and Investment Talk

Nice positive day for the market. Bears are so emotional. LOL!
You’ll have your share of positive days. But the trend will be down. Just watch the rates. If 5 yr goes to 3.5% again, maybe the market is recovering
 
Waller (unlike Bostic) is a Fed Voter and he just said "if Data Comes in Hot, May Need to Raise Rates Even More"
Even more means an extra 0.25% hike down the road. Slow and steady by the Fed. They understand the data.
 
Winners of the Q4 earnings season:


H4DW6KCWCJDYFD7S6JL2SYALK4.png
 
Are they cutting more costs? Wonder if this pause becomes permanent

Probably. They’re cutting employees and with hybrid workforce, they may want to reduce the footprint of their second HQ. They probably won’t do the 2nd phase at all.

I remember when Newark/Harrison was a finalist for this HQ2. Sad that it didn’t happen
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20
  • Like
Reactions: Postman_1
Probably. They’re cutting employees and with hybrid workforce, they may want to reduce the footprint of their second HQ. They probably won’t do the 2nd phase at all.

I remember when Newark/Harrison was a finalist for this HQ2. Sad that it didn’t happen

And now, when they've gone elsewhere, Murphy lets the large corporation surtax expire.
 
NVDA to me is like TSLA at the moment. This is xactly the wrong place to get in because of FOMO. TSLA was very interesting once in broke 120 on the way down, not so much here. NVDA will be interesting another 50 points lower, not here. This does not mean you buy NVDA at 180, but observe the direction of the big trades in that area and reassess.
NVDA going nowhere near the gap up. Needs to see higher. Still too rich for my taste.
 
NVDA going nowhere near the gap up. Needs to see higher. Still too rich for my taste.
Not saying now is the right time to buy, but NVDA is going to be the biggest company in the world (market cap) in the next 4-5 years. Almost all tech advances are dependent on their products. I am heavily overweight in NVDA and will remain so.
 
Careful. I would not fight the FED….
1) Many companies rely on debt.
2) Earnings will take a hit
1&2 will have an adverse effect on Foward looking PE.
Ahem….

JUST IN: With an earnings decline of -4.6% for Q4 2022, the S&P 500 reports its first year-over-year decline in earnings since Q3 2020.

77% of companies that issued guidance provided a negative outlook.

Corporations are feeling the pain of higher rates and rising prices.
 
Ahem….

JUST IN: With an earnings decline of -4.6% for Q4 2022, the S&P 500 reports its first year-over-year decline in earnings since Q3 2020.

77% of companies that issued guidance provided a negative outlook.

Corporations are feeling the pain of higher rates and rising prices.
For the stock market, it doesn't matter. Stock prices bottom 9-10 months before earnings bottom (did so in 2009, 2018, and 2020). The market is forward looking.

Also, earnings and prices are not as correlated as people think. After the Volker bear market ended in 1983, the market was up 230% for the rest of the decade, but earnings were up only 8% during the same time.
 
Tom L understands that his rosy outlook is dependent on a weak dollar and on lower yields. Got it.

Tom L. Also acknowledged that Higher yields make financing operations (for industrial and tech) more expensive, which would be problematic. I agree with all these points.
 
Tom L understands that his rosy outlook is dependent on a weak dollar and on lower yields. Got it.

Tom L. Also acknowledged that Higher yields make financing operations (for industrial and tech) more expensive, which would be problematic. I agree with all these points.
So higher stock market depends on weak dollar and lower yields. Fed will only lower the yield when inflation is below 2%. In my opinion inflation will only go down if unemployment rises. So I would keep a close eye at employment numbers as a first sign of bond market recovery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUTGERS95
Right. Eyes on TLT and DXY to keep it simple. Now, if no Fed cut in ‘23 then expect a revision of earning estimates for ‘24. Revisions down will make stocks too expensive.

Now, I wouldn't be surprised in S&P stays in this 3800-4200 bracket for quite some time. On a break of either side, we reasses.
 
Right. Eyes on TLT and DXY to keep it simple. Now, if no Fed cut in ‘23 then expect a revision of earning estimates for ‘24. Revisions down will make stocks too expensive.

Now, I wouldn't be surprised in S&P stays in this 3800-4200 bracket for quite some time. On a break of either side, we reasses.
FYI:
Years when earnings are down = 77% of the time annual market returns are positive (1930 to 2022)

If you want to play with TLT, go with TMF instead for some action.
 
So higher stock market depends on weak dollar and lower yields. Fed will only lower the yield when inflation is below 2%. In my opinion inflation will only go down if unemployment rises. So I would keep a close eye at employment numbers as a first sign of bond market recovery.
Unemployment isn't going anywhere (due to the people shortage) and inflation will be sub-3% by the summer. Shelter math will be catching up soon.
 
Unemployment isn't going anywhere (due to the people shortage) and inflation will be sub-3% by the summer. Shelter math will be catching up soon.
I am not sure if inflation will go down with low unemployment. People will keep spending/borrowing as long as they have jobs. If people keep spending, then prices will continue to rise. But, we will see how the next few months turns out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20
Right. Eyes on TLT and DXY to keep it simple. Now, if no Fed cut in ‘23 then expect a revision of earning estimates for ‘24. Revisions down will make stocks too expensive.

Now, I wouldn't be surprised in S&P stays in this 3800-4200 bracket for quite some time. On a break of either side, we reassess.
Good point. Also watch for the trading range to get tighter. The tighter it gets, the more likely it is to resolve with a downward move. We don't usually trade in a range like this for too long.
 
So higher stock market depends on weak dollar and lower yields. Fed will only lower the yield when inflation is below 2%. In my opinion inflation will only go down if unemployment rises. So I would keep a close eye at employment numbers as a first sign of bond market recovery.
Don’t forget wages
 
So I was reading last night and found out I man not be able to fund a Roth without being taxed. This is because of the Pro-Rata Rule.

Over 20 years ago I rolled over some money from a previous job into a IRA/Annuity fund through my bank. This account is now through Nationwide. I am in the process of pulling it from there because it's costing me about 2.5% in fees to keep it in there. Also what it is invested in is not so great. I guess this counts as a traditional IRA for me? If I open a Roth and fund it then I would be subject to this Pro-Rata Rule. Luckily I did not fund my Roth yet through Fidelity on the traditional I opened. Do any of you guys run into this problem if you have a traditional and then fund a Roth? Are there any ways around it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20
So I was reading last night and found out I man not be able to fund a Roth without being taxed. This is because of the Pro-Rata Rule.

Over 20 years ago I rolled over some money from a previous job into a IRA/Annuity fund through my bank. This account is now through Nationwide. I am in the process of pulling it from there because it's costing me about 2.5% in fees to keep it in there. Also what it is invested in is not so great. I guess this counts as a traditional IRA for me? If I open a Roth and fund it then I would be subject to this Pro-Rata Rule. Luckily I did not fund my Roth yet through Fidelity on the traditional I opened. Do any of you guys run into this problem if you have a traditional and then fund a Roth? Are there any ways around it?
You should seek the advice of a CPA in your area. I realize this is likely what you don't want to hear. But making such decisions on the advice of a poster or three from a sports message board is problematic.
 
So I was reading last night and found out I man not be able to fund a Roth without being taxed. This is because of the Pro-Rata Rule.

Over 20 years ago I rolled over some money from a previous job into a IRA/Annuity fund through my bank. This account is now through Nationwide. I am in the process of pulling it from there because it's costing me about 2.5% in fees to keep it in there. Also what it is invested in is not so great. I guess this counts as a traditional IRA for me? If I open a Roth and fund it then I would be subject to this Pro-Rata Rule. Luckily I did not fund my Roth yet through Fidelity on the traditional I opened. Do any of you guys run into this problem if you have a traditional and then fund a Roth? Are there any ways around it?
Anyone in the country (even Elon Musk or Peter Thiel) with earned income can contribute $6,500 to a backdoor Roth IRA in 2023. And up to the contribution limit in future years. Using a non-deductible IRA account is required so you are using after tax money.

As mentioned above, definitely double check with Fidelity or your advisor. Obviously, not sure of your exact situation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Postman_1
You should seek the advice of a CPA in your area. I realize this is likely what you don't want to hear. But making such decisions on the advice of a poster or three from a sports message board is problematic.
I reached out to one last week in my area they wanted $250 a hour and said most likely 6 hours. No way am I paying that. We get our taxes done this Wednesday. I will be asking a bunch of questions.

This is not accurate. Anyone in the country (even Elon Musk or Peter Thiel) with earned income can contribute $6,500 to a backdoor Roth IRA in 2023. And up to the contribution limit in future years. You are confusing multiple things here.

EDIT - I think the confusion here is traditional/rollover IRAs are different than non-deductible IRAs. The $6,500 contribution for 2023 is via a non-deductible IRA and thus after tax money. Once this account is opened, you can then convert to the Roth IRA without any tax consequences (since you already paid taxes on the $6,500). Understand? You are not getting any tax benefit up front, but rather will enjoy the tax benefits of a Roth down the road.

@RUinPinehurst - Is right. If you are still confused, hold off and talk with someone from Fidelity or your advisor.
Yeah it's a bit confusing. When I talk with the people at Fidelity they are helpful but careful not to give any advice on taxes to cover themselves. Getting our taxes one this Wednesday will be asking them. All's I wanted to do was just backdoor into a Roth. I just read this and it makes it sound like there is no way of avoiding taxes if a Roth is opened. Hopefully after talking to my tax guy on Wed it will be cleared up. Thanks for the feedback.

 
I reached out to one last week in my area they wanted $250 a hour and said most likely 6 hours. No way am I paying that. We get our taxes done this Wednesday. I will be asking a bunch of questions.


Yeah it's a bit confusing. When I talk with the people at Fidelity they are helpful but careful not to give any advice on taxes to cover themselves. Getting our taxes one this Wednesday will be asking them. All's I wanted to do was just backdoor into a Roth. I just read this and it makes it sound like there is no way of avoiding taxes if a Roth is opened. Hopefully after talking to my tax guy on Wed it will be cleared up. Thanks for the feedback.

Okay, I think Charles Schwab explains this situation:

"Note: If your 401(k) allows you to "roll in" an IRA account, as some do, you can essentially take your existing IRA out of the conversion calculation."

So, pro-rata doesn't include rollover IRA accounts from workplace 401ks or 403bs. LOL! Nuanced and confusing!
 
Last edited:
Okay, I think Charles Schwab explains this situation:

"Note: If your 401(k) allows you to "roll in" an IRA account, as some do, you can essentially take your existing IRA out of the conversion calculation."

So, pro-rata doesn't include rollover IRA accounts from workplace 401ks or 403bs. LOL! Nuanced and confusing!
Great thanks. That is what I did, I did a rollover from my first job out of high school into this. Also added some more $ via a rollover in 2008. Good info to know!
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20
I reached out to one last week in my area they wanted $250 a hour and said most likely 6 hours. No way am I paying that. We get our taxes done this Wednesday. I will be asking a bunch of questions.


Yeah it's a bit confusing. When I talk with the people at Fidelity they are helpful but careful not to give any advice on taxes to cover themselves. Getting our taxes one this Wednesday will be asking them. All's I wanted to do was just backdoor into a Roth. I just read this and it makes it sound like there is no way of avoiding taxes if a Roth is opened. Hopefully after talking to my tax guy on Wed it will be cleared up. Thanks for the feedback.

The pro rata rule sounds like an account that has both after tax money and pre tax money in your IRA or 401K and it determines the % that can be moved to a Roth account since only the pre tax will be taxed.

In the majority of IRA, the dollars are pre taxed so any money moved to a Roth account is considered taxable at your ordinary income tax rate. No way around it. You might be in a situation where your tax rate is currently low and it makes sense to convert. I started to move my IRA over to Roth before taking social security and when my tax rate was lower. I’ve been moving it for over 10 years and will continue for the next 15 years.
 
Unemployment isn't going anywhere (due to the people shortage) and inflation will be sub-3% by the summer. Shelter math will be catching up soon.
But do you now understand how the shelter math works? You used to think it was the price of homes and thought that the decrease in home prices would directly affect the inflation indexes.
 
But do you now understand how the shelter math works? You used to think it was the price of homes and thought that the decrease in home prices would directly affect the inflation indexes.
Yes, CPI Shelter has an awful lag versus reality, about 12 months. We are 8-9 months into this lag, so look for CPI Shelter to turn negative soon as it catches up with real-time data. Multiple Fed members, including Powell have cited this CPI program in recent months.

The market knows this and is forward looking, so plan accordingly!
 
Yes, CPI Shelter has an awful lag versus reality, about 12 months. We are 8-9 months into this lag, so look for CPI Shelter to turn negative soon as it catches up with real-time data. Multiple Fed members, including Powell have cited this CPI program in recent months.

The market knows this and is forward looking, so plan accordingly!
Yeah….you were citing the Case Shiller Home Price indices as the real-time data input. Home prices are not an input into the inflation indices. You were wrong.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT