definitely not the way I'd go. To do so would require an overhaul of state and federal agencies. I mean I like the streamline and reducing gov't but there must be risk in the mkts as evidenced by svb and signature bank. they are not systemic and bailing out depositors here is beyond the wrong move
I’ve never found myself in the ‘break up the banks’ camp, and I’m not getting there for political reasons. Having institutions that are systemically risky and therefore can’t be allowed to fail is distorting the market and making it impossible to do anything but bail out smaller banks.
If the Fed/Treasury didn’t bail out SVB’s deposits, what depositor (person or business) was going to leave money in Key Bank, Fifth Third, Regions Bank, etc etc etc. Why leave your money there when risk-free institutions are a transfer away?