ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Stop the Presses - Star-Ledger to stop printing

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is a nice letter from today's Coast Star. Well said. I tried to go neutral much earlier in the thread like this guy:

One of the nicest things about living in our area is the
people you meet and deal with on a daily basis. So many are
friendly, kind, informed, and seem to be good citizens. We
are fortunate that the violence, hatred, and cruelty we hear
about so often in society are limited in our local neighborhoods.
People make the difference. For example, the letters to the
editor in The Coast Star. The comments, for the most part,
will thank people or praise acts of kindness. Some point out
situations for consideration or maybe an occasional gripe.
Thankfully, we aren't usually subjected to meanness or hate
speech.
That is until election time rolls around. Politics can turn
people inside out. Political statements are often exaggerated,
often ill-informed, often repetitive, and sometimes hateful
and divisive.
News flash: Most people don't care who you want to win
an election. You have every right to express yourself in any
way you choose. Getting involved in the electoral process is
important, and more of us should join in. But when biases
are injected and vitriolic rhetoric is included to make your
point, remember that half the population will tune you out.
What's the point? Just repeating what the media presents is
not very productive.
How about comparing policies and scrutinizing past performances?
Because you may not like a candidate does not
mean your slant is going to influence anyone who also wants
what is best for our future.
Again, most readers really don't care who you want to
win. Honesty, civility, and straight talk will be more effective
 
The funniest part is the people crying the most will probably have their lives improved the most after Donald J Trump gets elected. Again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Postman_1
  • Like
Reactions: toby83
C'mon already. Alvin Bragg and Leticia James are unhinged, TDS addled lunatics. A trial without a jury, with a known far-left leaning judge? Please. And yes, the lib lemmings lapped this up.
To the "jury of his peers," oh please. And keep in mind, the burden of proof in a civil trial is far from “beyond a reasonable doubt”, but instead by a “preponderance of the evidence”, i.e. 51% certainty.
And why were all of these cases brought so late in the election cycle? I call balls and strikes on both sides, and foul balls too. Yes, Trump brought scrutiny on himself and harmed his case for recorded remarks he made long before he decided to run for office. Anyways, have a nice day.
Huh? I think you're confused. Trump was found guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a criminal trial, not a civil trial. I know you know the burden of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt" for a criminal trial (vs. the preponderance of evidence standard for civil trials). This was the case Bragg brought in NYC. Maybe you're thinking of the civil fraud case that James won against Trump in NY. Care to revise your analysis?

And the remaining indictments are not trivial and even with the recent SCOTUS ruling on limited immunity for a POTUS, there is still serious jeopardy there, especially on the classified documents case, which is largely behavior post-presidency. Surely, all of these cases (without even getting into his behaviors from a political perspective) must at least give you some pause about his fitness for the job.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-tr...mony-verdict-85558c6d08efb434d05b694364470aa0

https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/202...ns-landmark-victory-case-against-donald-trump
 
The funniest part is the people crying the most will probably have their lives improved the most after Donald J Trump gets elected. Again.
Sorry, but I'm pretty sure he won't win this election. Remember, I was right in 2020 about Biden winning and I'm confident (no guarantees, as I've never been an absolutist and this race is still very close) I'll be right about Kamala winning this time (and I also never said Hillary was going to win, unlike most on the left). All the momentum is with Harris now, especially with women and Latinos and we keep hearing better and better economic news, which will also help move the needle for Harris. Specifically, today the WSJ said that "the next president inherits a remarkable economy." And rightly or not, those in power get credit for those kinds of things.

https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-next-president-inherits-a-remarkable-economy-7be2d059
 
Sorry, but I'm pretty sure he won't win this election. Remember, I was right in 2020 about Biden winning and I'm confident (no guarantees, as I've never been an absolutist and this race is still very close) I'll be right about Kamala winning this time (and I also never said Hillary was going to win, unlike most on the left). All the momentum is with Harris now, especially with women and Latinos and we keep hearing better and better economic news, which will also help move the needle for Harris. Specifically, today the WSJ said that "the next president inherits a remarkable economy." And rightly or not, those in power get credit for those kinds of things.

https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-next-president-inherits-a-remarkable-economy-7be2d059
In the last 12 mos GDP grew $1.4Trillion (nominal), meanwhile Fed gov't debt increased by $2Trillion. The Federal Gov't is literally buying economic "growth" on the national credit card. The next POTUS will have to deal with bond vigilantes trying to lock-up the wild drunken sailor spending in Washington.
 
  • Like
Reactions: toby83 and ashokan
Alot of people in this thread wanted Joe Rogan off the air
I don't recall posters wanting Rogan off the air. I find him occasionally entertaining (liked his stand-up better than his podcasts though), but am not a fan of his promotion of numerous conspiracy theories (but am also no fan of censorship).
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotInRHouse
I don't recall posters wanting Rogan off the air. I find him occasionally entertaining (liked his stand-up better than his podcasts though), but am not a fan of his promotion of numerous conspiracy theories (but am also no fan of censorship).
A lot of the so called conspiracy theories are now true though. Not all but he’s right more than wrong. I don’t agree with everything anybody says but he has some interesting stuff on his podcast that makes you think. He has a lot of common sense and I like that
 
back on point....

I have all the sports pages from the SL for each RU Bowl framed. that I like:)
 
I don't recall posters wanting Rogan off the air. I find him occasionally entertaining (liked his stand-up better than his podcasts though), but am not a fan of his promotion of numerous conspiracy theories (but am also no fan of censorship).
are you going to pretend that there wasnt a push to get Rogan off the air because of his questioning of Covid...are you pretending that people didnt agree with those efforts to censor him
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT