They would just get hosed by the officials
How about the Washington Deceivers?
MO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They would just get hosed by the officials
Fine with Warriors too.Generals or Warriors get my vote,
No. The still have a slave owner's name associated with the team. Rename the district too.Yup, this is what The Left wants,unreal
Dear RU-Choppin-Ohio, stop posting one SJW's opinion as if they speak for all people of a similar skin shade.Dear white people, stop telling Native Americans whether we're offended by the Washington Redskins
My tribe doesn’t identify as 'redskins' – this is a derogatory term coined by colonialists often historically used interchangeably with 'savages'
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/voices/washington-redskins-name-controversy-native-americans-racism-white-people-a9058881.html?amp
Yeah that is the point which people don't seem to get. If you call me a nasty name, you don't get to decide whether or not it is derogatory. I do.Dear white people, stop telling Native Americans whether we're offended by the Washington Redskins
My tribe doesn’t identify as 'redskins' – this is a derogatory term coined by colonialists often historically used interchangeably with 'savages'
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/voices/washington-redskins-name-controversy-native-americans-racism-white-people-a9058881.html?amp
Dear RU-Choppin-Ohio, stop posting one SJW's opinion as if they speak for all people of a similar skin shade.
BTW.. who, exactly, is "white people"? No one actually has white skin.
So if one person is offended.. that's enough? If the majority are not offended.. that means nothing?Here's a basic lesson....if you call someone Redskins, you don't decide if it offends them....they do.
So if one person is offended.. that's enough? If the majority are not offended.. that means nothing?
That idea offends me.
Your example was one person.. "someone".. follow your own argument.One person? That's your takeaway? The example was obvious about a group of people.
You need a history lesson about the origin of and use of derogatory terms in the good ol USA, GoodOl. They are not Terms of Endearment.
Your example was one person.. "someone".. follow your own argument.
"Here's a basic lesson....if you call someone Redskins, you don't decide if it offends them....they do."
Love it!!!... the Washington Football Team. For 2020. Nickname to follow for 2021 and beyond.
Yup, this is what The Left wants,unreal
Some have said at some point the Cowboys will be on that list too.Given their location, they should have just said that they will be called America’s Team, just to tick off Dallas!
Some have said at some point the Cowboys will be on that list too.
I am on board with saying buh bye to the Redskin name and the Chief Wahoo image for the Cleveland Indians. Surprised either lasted as long as they did.Texas Rangers as well. It gets ridiculous. Funniest thing on this incident is that The Washington Post's own biased survey said large majority of American Indians were perfectly fine with the Redskins name. Be careful what you wish for. All vestiges of the American Indian may be erased. That would be kinda sad.
The funny part is they “won” at the end and that guy did not.Warriors!! Yeah!!
Probably very little. It's just a placeholder.I wonder how much $$$$ was spent in Marketing studies and surveys, to come up with "WFT??!"
Texas Rangers as well. It gets ridiculous. Funniest thing on this incident is that The Washington Post's own biased survey said large majority of American Indians were perfectly fine with the Redskins name. Be careful what you wish for. All vestiges of the American Indian may be erased. That would be kinda sad.
The Cleveland Indian one I got ya.Contrary to polls showing that relatively few Native Americans take offense at the Washington Redskins’ name, a new UC Berkeley study has found that at least half of more than 1,000 Native Americans surveyed are offended by the football team’s 87-year-old moniker and Native mascots in general.
The results are particularly timely in the face of Native American protests against caricatures of their culture, including the tomahawk chop — performed by fans of the Kansas City Chiefs, who won Sunday’s Super Bowl — and other sports teams with Native American monikers.
The study’s findings, published in the journal of Social Psychological and Personality Science, show that the degree to which those surveyed identified as Native American influenced how offensive they found Native mascots.
Of those polled for the study, 57% who strongly identify with being Native American and 67% of those who frequently engage in tribal cultural practices were found to be deeply insulted by caricatures of Native American culture.
https://news.berkeley.edu/2020/02/04/native-mascots-survey/
Of those polled for the study, 57% who strongly identify with being Native American and 67% of those who frequently engage in tribal cultural practices were found to be deeply insulted by caricatures of Native American culture.
However, 100% of the same people polled were TRULY offended by the product on the field during the last 25 years. (Which is something everyone could agree on)
I like it...The “scrubbing” part is hilarious.
I was not a fan of Red Wolves at first but after seeing the some of the uniform concepts...basically the Redskins with a wolf on the helmet instead of the Native American, not bad. Not bad at all.
But IMO I’d rather we honor the Native American contribution instead of hide/get rid of it and go with Windtalkers to honor the Navajo Code Talkers from WWII.
Love the alliteration too...Washington Windtalkers. It flows.
My bad closer to 30 (29) , I was being too kindWell, not quite 25 years. They won their third of three Super Bowls in 1991.
That’s why I thought using the name “Windtalkers” would be great...you HONOR the Native American and again say thank you for what they did for the Country when called upon.
And that’s where we got ‘em.The offended by the everything folks will scream cultural appropriation.
And that’s where we got ‘em.
You don’t like Windtalkers? Then you don’t like America and/or certain real Americans who answered the bell when their Country needed them most.
Whose the racist now, hmmm?
Contrary to polls showing that relatively few Native Americans take offense at the Washington Redskins’ name, a new UC Berkeley study has found that at least half of more than 1,000 Native Americans surveyed are offended by the football team’s 87-year-old moniker and Native mascots in general.
... the Washington Football Team. For 2020. Nickname to follow for 2021 and beyond.
Why The Face?Take # 2: Change the Order of the New Name to Washington Team Football (WTF).:Shocked
MO
And we got one. :ThumbsUp:USA: :America: :AmericanFlag:Hahahahaha
Their country needed them and what was their reward when they returned? Treated like 4th class citizens by the other Real Americans....you know which ones.
Maybe their reward was using an offensive term for a football team.
Because he's a racist? Is that what you are wondering about / implying?Why The Face?