I remember Bishop House well. Dr McCormick was my senior advisor. I suspect I disappointed him when I decided to law school instead of history grad school.Cultural History of the U.S. With Sussman was great. I had him for four or five courses. Richard McCormick's History of NJ was great too. He assigned papers that required primary research, my topic was the cholera epidemic of 1832 in NJ. Of course that was preinternet so research meant going through medical records, railroad and canal documents, newspapers, etc. Most of the history classes I had were in Bishop House, which sadly is an administration building now.
Cultural History of the U.S. With Sussman was great. I had him for four or five courses. Richard McCormick's History of NJ was great too. He assigned papers that required primary research, my topic was the cholera epidemic of 1832 in NJ. Of course that was preinternet so research meant going through medical records, railroad and canal documents, newspapers, etc. Most of the history classes I had were in Bishop House, which sadly is an administration building now.
You bet! Great history program and English too. I couldn't agree with you more on your comment about the focus on critical thinking and primary research. In my high school the focus was on facts and memorization---totally different from what I did as an undergrad history major at Rutgers. When I hear people say "what are you going to do with history other than teach," well let's just say we have different opinions. History at RU at that time, and perhaps now, was a great foundation dorm business school and law school.You'll recognize my avatar, then. Was a History major in the "old" Rutgers College. Lots of great instruction in the Bishop House. The focus was always on independent critical thinking and primary research. Neat atmosphere, too, in that old mansion. The old reading room/library was my favorite. Had a few "classes" in there, maybe ten students, tops, each time. Also the setting of my "Junior Honors Seminar." My focus was American History with an emphasis on military history and the South. Also collected lots of credits in English (in nearby Scott Hall) with an emphasis on American literature, and ended up with a "double major." The English department was really strong, as well, in those days.
I don't think I had to pay anything in the late 1960's,Oh, how many college courses did I skip to play the RU golf course... I think it was $4 a round for students back in the 80's.
Best hole on the course (and toughest for many)...Agree. I hate the 10th.
Histology Dr Babiarz (he still around? best teacher I had at RU)
Sexuality in Literature Professor Charney---class was fracking HILARIOUS
Organic Chem--multiple professors but best was Dr Moss--challenging but well presented course
Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics
1.Shakespeare with Ron Levao (obviously)
2.Byzantine History/Crusades with Stephen Reinert
3.Tolkien with William C. Dowling (no apologies!)
I was waiting for someone to mention Italian Cinema. I had Prof Laggini who said in the very first class that if anyone spells his name like the food that they would automatically fail the semester.History of Electoral Fraud in America with McCormick was my favorite followed by the legendary Italian Cinema more commonly known as "Guinea Cine" which definitely boosted the old GPA.
All At Cook
Ventilation design and survey Lab- Friday afternoon, pizza and beer with Dr. Manganelli.
Microeconomics- Forget Professors name, but told great stories relating to economics with slow gravelly voice, couldn't wait to get to class. Anybody who could get a science major to like economics must be a heck of a teacher. Anybody remember his name?
Landscape Architecture-Roy Deboer was one of the best teachers I have ever had. His passion was infectious.
Remember taking it in 05 or 06. The sections were still split. I would get there with 1/2 hour to go for the class preceding Orgo, just so I could get a seat in the front 3 rows I needed a letter of recommendation). People from the other sections would be sitting in the stairways. More than once Oconnor's class was stopped by the fire dept.O'Connor was great. Too bad they split the lecture duties in 3. But still a top 5 course as challenging as it was.
Actually Thermo is not the same as Transport - very different classes actually, but both are usually considered difficult classes. Thermo is more theoretical, with a lot of focus on equilibrium states and energy-entropy relationships, while transport is a more practical science (don't get me wrong, there's plenty of theory) aimed at understanding transport of mass, momentum and heat, usually with an eye towards understanding more practical things like fluid (liquid or gas) flow.a/k/a Transport Phenomena I & II? My ChemE major friends used to talk about this class like it was 80 minutes of pain & suffering...probably top 2-3 toughest classes in all of Rutgers engineering.