The idea is to keep improving the program so you win and are not at the committee’s mercy. We can only do that by progressively upping the schedule, getting better recruits from more exposure and playing games that make those kids better. If our whole team, meaning the depth behind Mawot, was better and battle tested we don’t lose at Minne last year and put it out of the committee’s hands.
Or we have a better record and make it impossible for Committee to reject a 20 game B1G schedule to keep us out.
Whole world said we beat Michigan and we are in. We did and still left out?
RU gets in the tourney and subject to a play in game. Little odd. Indiana team we beat higher seed?
We have fans putting us against Duke?
We have fans giving up the RAC to play UCLA in MSG.
We have fans who were content with giving up a MSU game to the Garden, a home game for MSU and then the next year a single away game @ MSU. So MSU doesn’t play at the RAC for three years. With four new teams in the league would anyone be shocked if Izzo doesn’t come to the RAC in 2025?
SHU weasels out of playing Rutgers during Covid. SHU plays PSU instead. How does SHU do that to us? How does the BIG and PSU do that to us?
After we schedule the above MSU Garden game the NCAA re-categorizes the game?
Same game scheduled for noon?
Love playing Princeton but why on Earth would you open up with them?
Supposed to play ND and end up playing Temple in Connecticut. RU fans would have flocked for ND. Instead Temple in a morbid arena.
Wisconsin 1 point loss at Garden? Imagine if that was at RAC? Think different result?
Even Eddie beat Wisc at the RAC!
We never seem to benefit from these scheduling “upgrades.”
Hate giving up the RAC home court advantage.
I’m petrified of losing games and confidence until three freshman are prime time ready at end of year.
I’m fine with 20 game B1G schedule SHU and Princeton. That’s 22 games. Battle tested enough. I want W’s.