Though I recognize the facetiousness of your post, If our fanbase actually cared about football and fielding the best team possible, Jeremiah Smith would be catching passes from Drew Allar.
But Since we have a beer budget, we have to watch kids develop and make their share of mistakes. How we recruit is a reflection of what we’ve invested in the program. In most cases, that’s nothing. Most have invested zero in football infrastructure, though there are limited exceptions. Most of what we’ve spent has gone towards operational expenses of running the football program. This is an opportunity to build the capital infrastructure of the program, to ensure the possibility for maximum success.
The thing is - in the pre NIL world there was some truth to what you say but unless / until things stabilize with the clearinghouse it’s honestly all for naught. There are just too many programs that have sugar daddy donors where money is truly no object. This means that, without a limiting cap on payments to players, if schools like Rutgers work hard to raise more money the price tag associated with players will simply rise because it’s no sweat at all to the sugar daddies to outbid us.
I do believe an end to this model, at least, may be in sight though. The blue blood programs where the money actually does come mostly from the die hard alums (OSU, Michigan, Alabama) and not one or two single multi millionaires who have millions to burn annually without financial impact - for those schools, this model is not only sub-optimal, at some point it might not even be sustainable. For the millionth time I reiterate - the NCAA has no power - zero. The fact that a Deloitte entity has even entered the picture at all is coming from the teams calling the shots. The blue bloods. And that’s why the Wild West will eventually end. At least, that’s my bold prediction.