So now you are going to use the Freeh report as something that was lacking factual, relevant information? That's pretty comical.
Where exactly was the political pressure coming from? The Paternos? The Penn State faithful?
If the NCAA would have had the legal authority to do what they did they would have upheld it. LOL @ George Mitchell and his reporting having anything at all to do with the sanctions being reduced. NCAA was going to lose their ass and couldn't afford to while also dealing with O'Bannon and UNC.
>"So now you are going to use the Freeh report as something that was lacking factual, relevant information?"<
it had the facts just not all needed to be accepted and Penn St hid what it could.
If the NCAA took that report and checked out everything in it thoroughly the minor flaws in it wouldn't have been made to look as bad as the Penn St backers were making it look and more proof of the coverup being football related would have come from that.
The sanctions were reduced because Mitchell reported that Penn St was implementing fixes and they were working . His report didn't say Penn St didn't deserve the punishment handed out to them, but that PSU had complied with what the NCAA demanded and a reduction in the penalty was deserved
As for the O'Bannon case , that was giving the NCAA real bad PR and so was the sanctions that they gave PSU. The lawsuits were putting the NCAA leadership
in the spotlight and they didn't want no part of that.
My personal feeling is they told Mitchell to find a way to let them exit the sanctions gracefully so Congress wouldn't have a reason to get involved.
Not that they did anything wrong concerning Penn St, but didn't want the way the NCAA is structured to be looked at as much as it might have if Congress was involved.
Pennsylvanian was going after them using straw men to file lawsuits along with some members of congress ( friendly to PSU) wanting the NCAA 's action towards PSU made into a federal issue.
I wonder if Penn St would have received what it truly deserved if the public, media and Congress knew about the payments Penn St was making to sexual abuse victims since the 1970s.
I doubt the "NCAA overstepped it's role" accusers could have claimed that after seeing just how long Penn St was covering up and paying off victims of child molestation cause by someone that Penn St was responsible for their actions.