Uh huh? And?Originally posted by ruhudsonfan:
GrubHub delivers you 3rd party food. Shitty 3rd party food. And as GrubHub chases topline revenue growth to satisfy Wall Street, they will price smaller sellers out--losing their variety in the process. And you can't order on GrubHub right now, for Wednesday's dinner.Originally posted by Sir ScarletKnight:
Part of your idea is somewhat similar to Grubhub, which is completely functional with the app. The 15 minute window is pretty much the trickiest part.Originally posted by ruhudsonfan:
The paradigm shift comes along the line of what Upstream is suggesting--and I thought what I alluded to somewhere above.
If I can open an app at 2pm while on a bus, browse a menu, confirm ingredients, confirm allergies, place my order, not have to worry about having cash, made modifications, order across a variety of cuisines and have it delivered within a 15 minute window at the time of my choosing, yeah, that is a paradigm shift. That turns the take-out model on its head.
As for sprig and munchery's limited roll out. That is rather obvious, no? This isn't software. There aren't economies of scale right out of the box. You launch your product in a limited space (in this case, a limited geography). You prove your concept works. You secure additional funds. You secure more space. Add more geography. Rinse and repeat. The scalability is almost unfathomable.
Think about one example.
munchery is selling 2,500-3,000 meals per dinner period. The are doing it with marginally higher labor cost (due to the advantages of selling the meals cold and using a cooking to scale process) and off the charts lower occupancy costs (on a s/f basis).
It's not hard to see why the two companies have received close to $500MM worth of funding.
As for an Uber for chefs. It has existed and has failed. Not to say it can't work, but the problem you have is retaining a quality bench of chefs and ensuring they are in an inspected kitchen.
It delivers food that people want (the market for premade good but relativelyexpensive meals is pretty limited). The only difference is that you cant order days in advance Which isnt a huge deal, since most people dont make their dining choices until the day they are eating.. 3rd party vs first party matters to the owners (GrubHub gets to concentrate on software only, the company that you are talking about has to concentrate on food and software). Plus if ordering days in advance becomes a big deal, then GrubHub will surely step in and start offering that.
Of course you already got at what the real deal is. They are throwing money at the software, because the real money for stuff like this is to get bought out by Google or Yahoo or Facebook before those companies invent their own version and put you out of business.
This post was edited on 3/10 10:28 AM by derleider