The thing is, it wasn't just the PSU game. It was the Michigan game and the Wisconsin game as well.
We don't see any "militarized police presence" in the front row of the Blue lot, where we typically wind up. I would suggest, however, that the use of that equipment is precisely the same as it is everywhere. I've asked the question, repeatedly, "why does my 6 man hometown PD need an MRAP?" The answer is because the government gives them the money to buy this shit and, cops being cops, they're gonna buy it and they're gonna use it for no reason at all. Bigger boys, bigger toys.
The University of Maryland has a policy around tailgating that makes perfect sense:
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PARTY AND A TAILGATE
- The Department of Public Safety differentiates between a “tailgate” and a “party” and a party may be disbanded and attendees removed from the lots.
- A tailgate has a variety of food and beverages, including non-alcoholic beverages, available in sufficient quantities for the number of people attending.
- A party has some of the following characteristics:
- Common containers such as kegs, party balls, large containers of mixed drinks, beer tubs, trash cans of beer
- Loud music
- Drinking games
- Underage drinkers
- Lack of food
- Large or excessive quantities of alcohol
- Large numbers of people
The point being that they allow "tailgates", but they don't allow "parties". I see no reason why Rutgers can't have the same policy.
As for enforcement, I think where you and I disconnect is that I believe - and we expressed to Julie and Sarah last year - that with regard to those situations that are obviously "parties", there is NO REASON WHATSOEVER to allow them to come into the lot, set up, create a disturbance and then get thrown out after somebody calls the cops (or the cops call themselves). The thing that you and others refuse to understand is that is as far as our request / recommendation went. The "obvious parties" should be denied admission to the lot.
Where you and others feel that this went wrong is in the belief that denying such activities causes "all the students" to not go to the games. This is utter crap. It causes a few hundred idiots to not go to the games. And frankly, they never actually went into the games anyway. Between arrest, removal, intoxication and boredom, they all wind up being gone by the end of the first quarter.
Nobody is trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist. I think that some are trying very hard to conflate one problem with another, which isn't right.