ADVERTISEMENT

RAPID REACTION - Wagner

Yeah .,.. not going to happen. I would expect it to be extremely rare, like maybe never, that Harper will be the only guard on the court (your "big" line-up). Not going to happen.

Also, you really do not understand the difference in ability and talent between Acuff and Williams. I have looked at this closely, and have looked at both players, both highlights and stats. Williams has always been, and is, the far better prospect and player than Acuff. Do not let last season's 21.7 ppg scoring average by Acuff deceive you. Let's be serious and look at this:

1) Williams was a STARTING PG for a mid-level team in a high level mid-major conference (Temple) as both a freshman and a sophomore. And he played well ... averaged about 9-9.5 ppg and 4+ assists/game in each season, 2.0 ass/TO ratio those 2 years, 1.3 stl/game, 48% 2-pt FG% ... and though not a great 3-point shooter (in fact poor his sophomore year and for RU last year), he was respectable as a frosh at 32+%, plus 3+ reb/game. He then was recruited as a transfer UP A LEVEL OR TWO to an top team in an elite conference, in Iowa State - where he never played because of an injury ... then transferred to Rutgers, another P6 team in a top conference. At RU between his injury recovery, followed by the suspension, eventually over-turned, limited him to just 12 games - during which he was the best player on the team (albeit a limited team), averaging 12+ ppg, 50% 2-point FG%, 1.2 stl/game, 3.4 rpg and 2.8 ass/g - with players who could not make a basket around him. And is an excellent defensive player.

2) Acuff is nowhere near the prospect or as good, generally, last season notwithstanding. He played for a weaker team (Duquesne) in a weaker conference to start his career - and played just 14 mpg as a frosh as a bench player, (3.7 ppg) and 23 mpg as a part-time starter as a soph (5.7 ppg). He was a better shooter (better 3-point FG% and better 2-point FG %) in those 2 years, with many fewer minutes and shots. Less than 1 ass/g, maybe a 1.2 ass/TO rate - a okay rebounder ... not known as a good defender. He then transferred DOWN a level, from a poor team in the A-10 to a worse team in the weaker MAC. He did start (34 mpg) at Eastern Michigan as a junior, shooting 34% from 3 and 55% from 2, averaging 14 ppg as their 2nd or 3rd leading scorer as a Junior. And as a Senior averaged 37 mpg for an awful Eastern Michigan team, but did average 21.7 ppg - his 3-point FG% and his 2-point FG% both dropped significantly (to 34% and 50%), for an eFG% of 48% vs 54% the year before ... went from 11 FG att per game to 19 FG att per game. Then transferred UP to RU.

Quite simply, though Acuff has the potential to be an offensive spark, he has NEVER played at even a high mid-major level, and has played for 4 awful teams. Williams has started since he was a freshman, and has played for an above average team in a mid-to higher level mid-major conference, and part of a season starting for RU - a team in a high major top conference. Williams is a much better defender, a better play-maker for his teammates, and a reasonably efficient 2-poin FG shooter, though true, not a strong 3-point shooter.

Also ... no way Davis only gets minutes based on match-ups only, and is NOT in the regular rotation: Pikiell has basically stated Davis is the primary back-up PG ... and his elite defensive skills will earn him regular minutes ... whether that is 8 mpg, 10 mpg or 12-15 or more mpg probably depends on whether his FT and 3-point shooting improve ... but he WILL be in the regular rotation somehow.
Great summary ! As I said have not seen very much at all of Acuff was basing it on his shooting ability and scoring.

I also agree with your summary on Jwill BUT he is a ball dominant guard who CANNOT shoot at all! Both factors contribute why it makes zero % logic to play alongside Ace and Dylan who will have the ball 95% of the time. Jwill gets lazy on D when he’s not scoring and he can only slash . Bad roster utilization plying him alongside Dylan and Ace. Dylan better creator and decision maker so Jwill becomes a counter productive to the lineup.

Pikes going to play his favorites but I know Ace and Dylan are going to score 60% plus of our points. I know they will be both doubled and triple teamed. I know they will find wide open shooters all game long. Who do you want shooting them? Jwill and Jmike???? Absolutely not they are probably the last 2 you want shooting.

So why start or play them big minutes alongside the 2 stud freshman?

That’s just bad utilization of talent IMO

RAPID REACTION - Wagner

Bigger lineup maximize space and shooting
Martini
Lathan
Ace
Harper
Hayes

Smaller teams. More outside shooting, play faster pace on Offense, and consider zone D to allow Ace and Dylan to rest and crash the boards.
Martini
Ace
Dylan
Hayes
Acuff when healthy

Second unit players
Jwill
Dercack
Lathan*
Acuff *
*when not starting

** have not seen enough from Acuff but based on his experience and track record but may need to adjust if he’s not up to the task like Noah wasn’t

Situation dependent based on matchup only. Not regular minutes
Ogbole
JMike
Yeah .,.. not going to happen. I would expect it to be extremely rare, like maybe never, that Harper will be the only guard on the court (your "big" line-up). Not going to happen.

Also, you really do not understand the difference in ability and talent between Acuff and Williams. I have looked at this closely, and have looked at both players, both highlights and stats. Williams has always been, and is, the far better prospect and player than Acuff. Do not let last season's 21.7 ppg scoring average by Acuff deceive you. Let's be serious and look at this:

1) Williams was a STARTING PG for a mid-level team in a high level mid-major conference (Temple) as both a freshman and a sophomore. And he played well ... averaged about 9-9.5 ppg and 4+ assists/game in each season, 2.0 ass/TO ratio those 2 years, 1.3 stl/game, 48% 2-pt FG% ... and though not a great 3-point shooter (in fact poor his sophomore year and for RU last year), he was respectable as a frosh at 32+%, plus 3+ reb/game. He then was recruited as a transfer UP A LEVEL OR TWO to an top team in an elite conference, in Iowa State - where he never played because of an injury ... then transferred to Rutgers, another P6 team in a top conference. At RU between his injury recovery, followed by the suspension, eventually over-turned, limited him to just 12 games - during which he was the best player on the team (albeit a limited team), averaging 12+ ppg, 50% 2-point FG%, 1.2 stl/game, 3.4 rpg and 2.8 ass/g - with players who could not make a basket around him. And is an excellent defensive player.

2) Acuff is nowhere near the prospect or as good, generally, last season notwithstanding. He played for a weaker team (Duquesne) in a weaker conference to start his career - and played just 14 mpg as a frosh as a bench player, (3.7 ppg) and 23 mpg as a part-time starter as a soph (5.7 ppg). He was a better shooter (better 3-point FG% and better 2-point FG %) in those 2 years, with many fewer minutes and shots. Less than 1 ass/g, maybe a 1.2 ass/TO rate - a okay rebounder ... not known as a good defender. He then transferred DOWN a level, from a poor team in the A-10 to a worse team in the weaker MAC. He did start (34 mpg) at Eastern Michigan as a junior, shooting 34% from 3 and 55% from 2, averaging 14 ppg as their 2nd or 3rd leading scorer as a Junior. And as a Senior averaged 37 mpg for an awful Eastern Michigan team, but did average 21.7 ppg - his 3-point FG% and his 2-point FG% both dropped significantly (to 34% and 50%), for an eFG% of 48% vs 54% the year before ... went from 11 FG att per game to 19 FG att per game. Then transferred UP to RU.

Quite simply, though Acuff has the potential to be an offensive spark, he has NEVER played at even a high mid-major level, and has played for 4 awful teams. Williams has started since he was a freshman, and has played for an above average team in a mid-to higher level mid-major conference, and part of a season starting for RU - a team in a high major top conference. Williams is a much better defender, a better play-maker for his teammates, and a reasonably efficient 2-poin FG shooter, though true, not a strong 3-point shooter.

Also ... no way Davis only gets minutes based on match-ups only, and is NOT in the regular rotation: Pikiell has basically stated Davis is the primary back-up PG ... and his elite defensive skills will earn him regular minutes ... whether that is 8 mpg, 10 mpg or 12-15 or more mpg probably depends on whether his FT and 3-point shooting improve ... but he WILL be in the regular rotation somehow.
  • Like
Reactions: Unionst

OT: RIP Ben Herbstreit

"I’ve had dogs my whole life but Ben was 1 on 1. He was smart-loving-gentle-patient-inquisitive-and welcoming to all. " - Herb.

Pet dogs are often like that because that's how people bred and domesticated them.
Wild Dogs in nature are akin to wolves and hyenas.

People have become more hostile to other people.
Misanthropy causes peeps to look to take-up the human relationship slack with pets.
Like Pinocchio, people descend into animal impulses and the pets seem more human.

I like pets and always had cats and dogs.
However I get apprehensive seeing all the "Dog Mom" stuff on bumpers and in merch.
Real motherhood has been declining while the 'dog mom" thing escalates.

Hispanic immigrants have a different relation with animals (they work with them)
Some - like Cesar (Mexican) - just give dogs a look or gesture and the animal responds.
They have a different connection with pets yet also with their kids.

They like being parents - many of the young women dont see life as a quest to "be hot."
A 25 year old girl can happily have 2 or 3 kids already.
The kids are super nice and polite.
A worker gets greeted at home by kids rushing out - the dog too but the kids are #1.

So they love their pets but their kids more.
America has lost that imo
America doesn't love their kids more?

What kind of fiery nonsense is that?

If we go winless the rest of the season, and the games are not close…

Yes, all fans can do is vote with their wallet. But our fans don't donate enough, don't buy enough tickets or buy enough merchandise to matter. Not in the NIL era or really ever. Not like fans of the elite Big Ten schools, at least. If 1/2 the current season ticket holders stopped buying tickets, it wouldn't make that big a difference right now. Pretty sure GS would still be here for at least 3 more years.

The only way fans can make a difference right now is to buy the team the same number of elite players from the transfer portal and through HS recruitment that all the elite teams have. Pretty sure if we did that, the team, even with GS coaching, would win a lot more games and regularly compete much better with the elite teams. Even in seasons when we have lots of injuries we'd be a lot better.

The thing is, without enough NIL funding, I don't think there's a coach alive that can make a big difference. Where great coaching would matter would be if we were good enough and deep enough to compete with the elites but not able to win the conference or get to the playoffs. GS, despite me not wanting him back, despite all the fans crapping on him these days, has actually demonstrated that he can produce a great season if he has the horses. He just might not be a good enough game day coach to beat other elite team's coaches even with equivalent players.

Anyway, what fans think or how they feel is mostly irrelevant these days. The only thing getting RU out of the basement is NIL funding.

I'm not saying people should donate. Just pointing out the reality of the situation. Fans don't control the hiring/firing of the coach. They do control how much they choose to donate and our fans don't donate anywhere near enough.
Agree re. NIL
Pre NIL, we weren’t competing and beating the big boys
Now, with NIL, at least there’s a chance
  • Like
Reactions: mildone

B1G Tournament Women's Soccer vs. No. 4 USC

Taglarieni made it all work for them. You are absolutely right about Tiernan, except she doesn't hold it because she thinks she doesn't have a finisher, she holds it because she wants to do it herself & score. Baran is a finisher. They will move the ball better without Riley.
RU career assist leader……your disdain for her is a little creepy.
  • Like
Reactions: Leonard23

If we go winless the rest of the season, and the games are not close…

"If that's not clear as day to KN and the rest of the guys who drink the Kool-Aid and suck Greg off, I don't know what to tell them:
Well try telling them the 4 upcoming games are hopeless and 1 win is the best that can be expected even though Rutgers might stand a chance to win two of them and maybe turn it around enough to go 7-5 for the year.
You might not know what to tell "KN and the rest of the guys who drink the Kool-Aid and suck Greg off",
but I do:
Keep on supporting the program and stand by Schiano until the hope is gone , then make up your mind about where the program stands with G-2 in charge.
Don't let a poster that's constantly whining how FSU is doing and claiming Rutgers losses become thge games are played make you rush out waving a white flag and looking to tar and feather Greg so Norvel
has company in the smooth dog house.
I don't know if RU can win 4 or will lose all 4, but I won't call the games before they are played nor will I make like those with hope the season will end with a bowl game victory are fools
FSU might suck this year, but aI won't have that make it easier for me to put Rutgers in the same failure catogary, but will admit I'm a little disapointed about the 4 game skid and neededing to win 2 of the last 4 games just to break even . After going 4-0 I felt confident of RU being bowl eligible by now, so I'm disapointed it's not but not enough to call it a season before the 12 game is played.
A wise man recently proclaimed “I don’t know what he just said, and I’m pretty sure he doesn’t know either.”

Nobody’s tar and feathering Schiano
Coming off the bye, I fully expect us to play well tomorrow and get the win - GS generally has the boys ready to go after bye weeks

Is that being a homer?
Probably yes, if we’re going by the spread, momentum and Minnesota’s recent results

But what we’ve seen through 8 games is a lot of what we’ve seen throughout both of his tenures here

The man isn’t coaching for free
He’s recently been awarded a 7 year extension at 7/mil per year

For that type of money and job security, I expect results - and by results, w the talent on this team and the schedule we have this year, that means wins
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT