PSAL_Hoops said:

Being 54th most efficient out of 59 BIG starters (guys playing 24+ minutes) does not make any sort of a case that Dylan Grant or any other utility player on our roster should be playing over Ace.

You say we “have to be better” on offense. Yes - we do. 45.8% shooting inclusive of 33.3% from 3 IS better - and it’s likely a lot better than Dylan Grant can do for us right now. He’s not going to improve our rebounding over Ace, and he’s not going to make our offense better. Are you suggesting that the rest of his D as a true frosh also should be presumed to be that much better than Ace’s? Ace does some good things sometimes on D by the way with highlight reel blocks and such. Hes no Jaden Jones. I’m just not seeing your argument.

Click to expand...

MitchLL said:

I have Kevin Maas flashbacks watching Rice.

Just don't know if he's going to develop.

Click to expand...

fluoxetine said:

I mean I guess every Division I team is a “good basketball team” in some context but in this context a good team needs to be like at least.. an average P5 team?

No one’s saying a Princeton or even a Kennesaw can’t beat good teams on any given day but that doesn’t make them tournament worthy teams

FYI the other four teams Kennesaw beat home were Toccoa Falls, Bryan (not Bryant, Bryan), Presbyterian, and Abilene Christian.

Woooo

Click to expand...

MADHAT1 said:

Also this gives Rutgers fans a look at what next years running game should look like with Benjamin
and Raymond carrying the load in the rate bowl .

Click to expand...

RUJohnny said:

You deserve to be visited by three ghosts tonight.

Click to expand...