ADVERTISEMENT

College Football Playoff meetings not about expansion. It's about college sports survival

One thing I have not seen the sports media dig into is the possibility of certain politics bleeding into college sports revenue.

The US and New Zealand are the only countries that allow direct to consumer advertising by pharmaceutical companies. The new admin has talked about ending that, and if it came to pass it would be a $15 billion+ annual advertising customer disappearing from the media companies that pay the college sports revenue.


I miss the days that pharmaceutical ads were not allowed.
They were allowed starting in the mid-80's, but under strict rules. Those rules were relaxed in 1997. Now it's a free for all and I'm going to guess very few people are walking into their doctors office saying " hey, doc, while I was watching Rutgers play Nebraska this Saturday on TV I saw an ad that said something about the itch I have on my top shoulder. Can I get that drug? You know, the ad with the 2 people gardening?"

GAME 26 OREGON: Death Spiral

Not at all. In the midst of a hugely disappointing season some criticism is certainly expected and warranted.

What I object to is the absolute over-the-top rhetoric “Pike sucks, Pike blows, Fire him now, He’s done, It’s over” yadda, yadda, yadda. Thread after thread after thread, from the same cast of characters. But you know what, even if he’s not completely oblivious to it, Pikes is a big boy, he can take it.

I also think it sucks that the overly obnoxious criticism has been directed at virtually every player. Plenty of constructive commentary, but also tons of absolute mean-spirited shyte. And I know the new thing is “Well, they’re getting paid now so they’re fair game.” Just the latest excuse for poor behavior by supposed adults.

Example: in a recently posted thread citing Carino saying the Washington start time is a disgrace, one poster said “Rutgers basketball is a disgrace.” The program is a disgrace? I think that’s uncalled for. But right there with a big 👍 is our own Grantland Rice (aka bac2therac).
I have no issue with the comment I liked
  • Like
Reactions: darkcheck

Sustain and retain …Pike’s and Rutgers basketball way forward to rebuilding the program

Disagree. I think that team can be good given the two transfers can be solid starters and one of the freshman can be a decent Big 10 contributor. To have a competing team in the Big Ten, I'd say you need 8-10 players that will be effective in conference play, with 2-3 of those players being true impact players.

I think Grant has already started to prove he can be an impact player, and Lathan has had some moments as well. I think one of the freshmen can hopefully be a solid contributor right away, and JMike, Ogbole and Dortch will improve. The key is Pike being able to get two good transfers that can be viable to solid starters. They don't have to be elite, just have to be Big 10-caliber.

It's too early to say where RU will compare to other Big 10 teams for next season before transfer portal departures/additions, but if Pike can retain the right guys and get a couple nice portal additions, it can be a solid team.
Hope you are right. You have a lot more confidence in Pike as a coach than I do.

College Football Playoff meetings not about expansion. It's about college sports survival

One thing I have not seen the sports media dig into is the possibility of certain politics bleeding into college sports revenue.

The US and New Zealand are the only countries that allow direct to consumer advertising by pharmaceutical companies. The new admin has talked about ending that, and if it came to pass it would be a $15 billion+ annual advertising customer disappearing from the media companies that pay the college sports revenue.
  • Love
Reactions: rubigtimenow

Sustain and retain …Pike’s and Rutgers basketball way forward to rebuilding the program

Two from the portal, regardless of who they are, with this group and Pike will get us last place in the B1G
Disagree. I think that team can be good given the two transfers can be solid starters and one of the freshman can be a decent Big 10 contributor. To have a competing team in the Big Ten, I'd say you need 8-10 players that will be effective in conference play, with 2-3 of those players being true impact players.

I think Grant has already started to prove he can be an impact player, and Lathan has had some moments as well. I think one of the freshmen can hopefully be a solid contributor right away, and JMike, Ogbole and Dortch will improve. The key is Pike being able to get two good transfers that can be viable to solid starters. They don't have to be elite, just have to be Big 10-caliber.

It's too early to say where RU will compare to other Big 10 teams for next season before transfer portal departures/additions, but if Pike can retain the right guys and get a couple nice portal additions, it can be a solid team.
  • Like
Reactions: ancienthooper

OT: NJ Property Tax Relief Applications

yes I took me almost an hour to do it all because I had to gather all that info on the fly and create that id.me
It would be nice if they told you all you will need as a list before you start the process.

As I also noted a few weeks ago when I posted about this process and changes is that the base year for Anchor has eliminated 2022 & 2023 to harmonize the basis for income . for non-seniors this could screw them out of the program or reduce their benefit because their income could have changed as well as their residency as home owner vs. renter.
The form does ask for 2023 and 2024 income, so presumably benefits are based on that income.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT