Motion to ban this neverending debate on Mag's impact? It's getting super tiresome reading the same arguments in every thread.
Motion to ban this neverending debate on Mag's impact? It's getting super tiresome reading the same arguments in every thread.
Money talks ….bs walksIf Oskar stays, he would be doing so knowing he likely will be end of the bench, but he might be OK with that and just want to be a part of the historic season
JMike was a lower ranked player who started for us most of the season and has played well as a freshman. He's boys with Ace. It would be shocking if he left. Can't see it
Yeah I don't read most of his posts because he loves typing but IMO for this season he is saying Mag or no Mag isn't really a big deal because he can't score and I agree with that. Kid has been wildly inconsistent for someone who demanded money to stay.Hawk has so many takes it gets hard to keep track.
Hawks biggest (and worst) take on Mag was that his injury last had no impact on our NCAA tournament chances. This was a ridiculous take.
He then said over the past few months that Mag was the key piece to our tournament chances this year (which was a complete contradiction to his view on his impact last year).
A healthy Mag who is willing to play gives you one of the best defenders in college basketball and 10-12 ppg.
Now we’ve only seen this a few games this year as he clearly hasn’t been healthy and there’s also questions on whether he’s actually able to play. I think most are now accepting of the fact that it’s probably best to move on from him….but that has nothing to do with the wild takes Hawk had lol.
Completely disagree Mag was a better on ball defender than Caleb last year. He’s an incredibly disruptive team defender, but he was not the lockdown force Caleb was.Mag was an elite defender and was a better on ball defender than Caleb last year (sorry psalhoops). He was instrumental in leading our press. He was extremely valuable to last year's team because of what he brought to the table and our lack of depth.
This year he has been a shell of what he was last year. There is no comparison to Mag 2023 and Mag 2024. Add the fact he is always in street clothes......
I saw it the opposite....Mag better on ball defender, but Caleb was the better overall defender because he was disruptive as a helper and being in passing lanes.Completely disagree Mag was a better on ball defender than Caleb last year. He’s an incredibly disruptive team defender, but he was not the lockdown force Caleb was.
But we didn't lose one of the other starters. We lost Mag. The team then spiraled down the toilet. If we won one more game post Mag injury we would have made the tournament but you can't even admit that would have happened. You're denying the obvious to try to make a pointI said that many times and stated that Mag was my fifth or 6th most valuable player last year behind Cliff, Caleb, Spencer, Hyatt, then Paul and Mag.
We had forwards to offset Mag. But we didn't play Simpson more, when he provided the only piece able to pressure the ball, get steals and get easy baskets in transition. We could or should have moved Paul off the ball and played him and Hyatt in Mags spot and elevated Simpson.....we didn't do that until the B1G tournament, but it was way too late.
Removing any of the 5 players that were more important than Mag from the equation would have done even more damage than just losing Mag....it takes a long time to correct bad narratives that just simply never showed to be true on the court or during games.
Caleb in my opinion was the more important defender. He erased guys from the game, whomever he guarded. Mag is better pressing than mostly everyone.I saw it the opposite....Mag better on ball defender, but Caleb was the better overall defender because he was disruptive as a helper and being in passing lanes.
Mag was less important on this year's team than he was to last year's teamYeah I don't read most of his posts because he loves typing but IMO for this season he is saying Mag or no Mag isn't really a big deal because he can't score and I agree with that. Kid has been wildly inconsistent for someone who demanded money to stay.
This literally has absolutely nothing to so with last seasonWhere is Mag now my friend?? Where is the impact?? He's not even trying to play, only would a large segment of RU fans accept mediocre as a standard.....and further excuse make now, when the season is still ongoing.
I think part of the disconnect is when you and Hawk argue against the straw man where you imply Mag has to be this complete superstar offensive studYou can replace Mag without a big boatload of cash. This is where I think people go too far with the mag thing. He is not some great player that only a stud cash grabbing portal acquisition can replace.
It’s my belief that this season does validate @NewJerseyHawk.
Mag was a role player overvalued because of a lack of depth and a significant drop in point guard play, after his injury. Sure, he was playing well no doubt. If he was the same player this year the offense would’ve been just as dreadful. And do we think the defense would’ve moved from 2 to 1? But I think he was spot on in thinking there was real pause to believe he was the player of the 8 game stretch he played on and reason to believe his skillset was not as unique as described. Ultimately I think this team this season was lucky to finish where they have.
NJH,
We are mostly in the same page regarding 2023/24 Mag.
One hole in your arguement. Preseason you precisely hit that Mag was not going to be effective or could be counted on as he was coming off injury. Why wouldnt next year he be healthy and revert to the player (with sone warts) he was last year.
Again i agree with your assessment of Mag with sine of the off court issues and both of us wint lose sleep if be goes elsewhere
I don’t think I can name a game Mag got the harder matchup than Caleb.I saw it the opposite....Mag better on ball defender, but Caleb was the better overall defender because he was disruptive as a helper and being in passing lanes.
Caleb played with a hurt back for 1/2 of his career. I know a D1 athlete of an olympic sport that has a fracture in his back and has to take advil before every practice and meet. Sitting out is the last resort.Your question assumes he’s going to be healthy next year doesn’t it? Or are you assuming he’s faking injury / not being at 100% now? I highly doubt that. Pike might be annoying in the sense that he thinks Mag should be able to play and is choosing not to play through discomfort or whatever - but this isn’t about defending Mag. If he’s 100% right now - playing would improve his stock. Sitting out does the opposite. I don’t know why people think I’m “defending” him in saying its very unlikely he’s feeling “fine” and simply choosing not to play. It just doesn’t make sense.
The reality is there is no guarantee he will ever be the player he was last year again. That’s why it’s not worth the risk retaining him next season. Period.
This is a perfect summation to this entire thread.I think part of the disconnect is when you and Hawk argue against the straw man where you imply Mag has to be this complete superstar offensive stud
Mag's value is to be an excellent ROLE PLAYER. Not a super star. That's why he has value on next year's team where there are superstars coming in. He can play the role suited for him and excel
Mag is not a requirement next season for success. I have not and will not argue that he is. Yes, I want Mag back if he wants to be here. If we have the money and can upgrade that is fine
I will caution that it's possible an "upgrade" in the portal doesn't pan out and we will wish we had Mag instead. What if the portal replacement is another Noah who underperformed? Have to at least consider that could be an outcome
I have pushed back on Hawk saying we are fine bc Grant and Dortch are better. They might be better eventually, but odds are they will not be better than Mag as a senior vs their freshman year. We can't overly rely on freshman next season. We are already relying on 2 freshman stars and likely a freshman big with a sizable role (even bigger if Cliff leaves)
Counting on too much from too many freshman would likely lead to a disappointing season. We can't take that risk with 1 year of Ace and Dylan. We need veterans who can play at the B1G level and we know Mag is capable
NJH,
We are mostly in the same page regarding 2023/24 Mag.
One hole in your arguement. Preseason you precisely hit that Mag was not going to be effective or could be counted on as he was coming off injury. Why wouldnt next year he be healthy and revert to the player (with sone warts) he was last year.
Again i agree with your assessment of Mag with sine of the off court issues and both of us wint lose sleep if be goes elsewhere
1. That isnt trueBaye Ndongo - Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets Forward - ESPN
View the profile of Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets Forward Baye Ndongo on ESPN. Get the latest news, live stats and game highlights.www.espn.com
This is the FLOOR of what most teams get from a starter in a Power conference.
11 to 12 PPG
8 RPG
55 FG shooting
1 block per game
Mag averages half the amount of rebounds and in games against better teams, his numbers aren't there.
Why are you defensive about this. It is NOT me who keeps asking Pike the questions about Mag....he can play, otherwise, designate his injury and say he's out for the season.One other thing I've been meaning to address, as Hawk (and now Greene and others) have been beating the drum that Mag is willingly choosing not to compete, or not "trying" to play through his injuries.
But nobody has any FACTS to back up this opinion. IT'S UTTER SPECULATION, AND IT'S FRANKLY A DISGUSTING TAKE ON ONE OF OUR PLAYERS, who, as we all know, is one year removed from ACL surgery and has been reported to have nagging injuries to his other leg now.
It is really repulsive that people get on a public forum and accuse an injured player of dogging it and basically giving up on his teammates, without one iota of proof or facts to back up these internet message board tough-guy speculative opinions.
Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, knows what Mawot Mag is going through with his injury recovery, and people really need to stop saying that he's purposely not playing.
Why don't we look up what B1G or Power 5/6 starters do across CBB. What is the standard?1. That isnt true
2. That is amatuer analysis
You are not going to find more than a half of dozen non centers that average over 12-8 55% and 1 bpg power conference1. That isnt true
2. That is amatuer analysis
It would be utter speculation if countless times Pikiell didn't say playing is up to him OR he practiced great the other day.One other thing I've been meaning to address, as Hawk (and now Greene and others) have been beating the drum that Mag is willingly choosing not to compete, or not "trying" to play through his injuries.
But nobody has any FACTS to back up this opinion. IT'S UTTER SPECULATION, AND IT'S FRANKLY A DISGUSTING TAKE ON ONE OF OUR PLAYERS, who, as we all know, is one year removed from ACL surgery and has been reported to have nagging injuries to his other leg now.
It is really repulsive that people get on a public forum and accuse an injured player of dogging it and basically giving up on his teammates, without one iota of proof or facts to back up these internet message board tough-guy speculative opinions.
Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, knows what Mawot Mag is going through with his injury recovery, and people really need to stop saying that he's purposely not playing.
And I've asked the question 15 different times....what gives you or any reason to believe that based on his play this year, that he's an impact player now or would have been last year?? Most of last year was not good offense and he's not an offensive player. It is an excuse that I'm not accepting and there's nothing he has done this year that changes my mind.But we didn't lose one of the other starters. We lost Mag. The team then spiraled down the toilet. If we won one more game post Mag injury we would have made the tournament but you can't even admit that would have happened. You're denying the obvious to try to make a point
Just bc the team would have been worse if one of the other players went down with an injury doesn't mean we didn't stink it up bc Mag was the one that got hurt
You're being intellectually dishonest
I don’t think we are arguing a straw man and I think we agree he’s a good role player.I think part of the disconnect is when you and Hawk argue against the straw man where you imply Mag has to be this complete superstar offensive stud
Mag's value is to be an excellent ROLE PLAYER. Not a super star. That's why he has value on next year's team where there are superstars coming in. He can play the role suited for him and excel
Mag is not a requirement next season for success. I have not and will not argue that he is. Yes, I want Mag back if he wants to be here. If we have the money and can upgrade that is fine
I will caution that it's possible an "upgrade" in the portal doesn't pan out and we will wish we had Mag instead. What if the portal replacement is another Noah who underperformed? Have to at least consider that could be an outcome
I have pushed back on Hawk saying we are fine bc Grant and Dortch are better. They might be better eventually, but odds are they will not be better than Mag as a senior vs their freshman year. We can't overly rely on freshman next season. We are already relying on 2 freshman stars and likely a freshman big with a sizable role (even bigger if Cliff leaves)
Counting on too much from too many freshman would likely lead to a disappointing season. We can't take that risk with 1 year of Ace and Dylan. We need veterans who can play at the B1G level and we know Mag is capable
It's very plainly obvious Pikiell is pissed that a guy he's shown loyalty to at every step -- getting him in HS when he had no other high major offers, sticking with him as a freshman and a sophomore when he was basically nothing, not bringing in anyone to compete for his minutes despite the injury, getting him whatever NIL his camp wanted -- has made it pretty clearly known that he intends to leave the team after the season, before the season is even finished. Whatever you think of the new realities of college basketball and player freedom etc, that would upset every single coach in the country.It would be utter speculation if countless times Pikiell didn't say playing is up to him OR he practiced great the other day.
I think a tough guy on a message board saying Mag should play when he is actually badly hurt is 1/100 as bad as the Head Coach indirectly saying it over and over in press conferences.
If what I am saying is disgusting what is the adjective we use for Pike.
This year's team just lacks offensive firepower and stars so a role player isn't going to make as big of an impact either wayI don’t think we are arguing a straw man and I think we agree he’s a good role player.
I won’t speak for Hawk but my opinion continues to be you have to recruit over a player like him because that’s the only way you can get better. You can’t play role players 30 mins and not replace them when you are an average or worse team.
The only path to improve your team is to offer minutes that the guys you have are occupying and we just don’t need what mag gives as much as we need what he doesn’t give. A wing is too valuable a position. You only get a Noah type when you don’t portaling for a replacement and instead just add a depth piece.
I think next year's team will need EXACTLY what 2022-23 Mag was.And I've asked the question 15 different times....what gives you or any reason to believe that based on his play this year, that he's an impact player now or would have been last year?? Most of last year was not good offense and he's not an offensive player. It is an excuse that I'm not accepting and there's nothing he has done this year that changes my mind.
You will respond that he is still injured and make another excuse and accept that's OK, instead of avoiding the same situation next year and trying to find a player who's better. We just don't agree or I just don't make blanket excuses.
100% to 1st two partsI think next year's team will need EXACTLY what 2022-23 Mag was.
We wouldn't need Mag taking shots.
I don't have confidence that 2022-23 Mag is returning in 2024-25
Injuries are tough to comment on bc the average board poster has no idea how healthy a player is. It's speculationOne other thing I've been meaning to address, as Hawk (and now Greene and others) have been beating the drum that Mag is willingly choosing not to compete, or not "trying" to play through his injuries.
But nobody has any FACTS to back up this opinion. IT'S UTTER SPECULATION, AND IT'S FRANKLY A DISGUSTING TAKE ON ONE OF OUR PLAYERS, who, as we all know, is one year removed from ACL surgery and has been reported to have nagging injuries to his other leg now.
It is really repulsive that people get on a public forum and accuse an injured player of dogging it and basically giving up on his teammates, without one iota of proof or facts to back up these internet message board tough-guy speculative opinions.
Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, knows what Mawot Mag is going through with his injury recovery, and people really need to stop saying that he's purposely not playing.
I saw it the opposite....Mag better on ball defender, but Caleb was the better overall defender because he was disruptive as a helper and being in passing lanes.
Caleb played with a hurt back for 1/2 of his career. I know a D1 athlete of an olympic sport that has a fracture in his back and has to take advil before every practice and meet. Sitting out is the last resort.
Either Pikiell is a real jerk or Mag should be playing.
In the Big Ten, there are three guys near the 12/8/55%/1 block club. All are centersYou are not going to find more than a half of dozen non centers that average over 12-8 55% and 1 bpg power conference
There's literally no chance of that happening as in ZERO. Because he has a chance or has a coach waiting, begging, pleading for Mag to actually do that THIS season and he showed literally no interest in doing so, outside of maybe 2 or 3 games.
Mag "could have" stepped up and declined to do so. He doesn't have to play 25 minutes a game, but he's not playing any.....when is this going to sink in??
What is preventing Mag from doing everything you think he could do next year.....he immediately went right into the starting lineup THREE separate times after sitting games. He has the ball in his hands more than enough to score, playmake.
Why don't we just admit, he's not that type of player, instead if hoping and wishing it into reality?? I don't see how this isn't registering.
Why do we have to continue to give chance after chance, after another chance, for a player not built for that type of role?? Does this happen anywhere else in Power 5 conferences?? Be realistic, he has a track record of scoring 6 or fewer points as a starter than reaching 12PPG. If he had a 3 point shot, I'd be inclined to think it "might happen", but even teams who know Aundre Hyatt is a shooter, doesn't hit 37 to 38% from 3.....Mag is around 25% from 3, with no focus from defenses.....is that going to get better??
I don’t think that’s true though if anything he would get less shots next year and he’s a career 44/26/70 player
and most are centersIn the Big Ten, there are three guys near the 12/8/55%/1 block club. All are centers
Edey shoots 62.3%, 24.1 pts, 11.7 reb, 2.2 blk and will be the national POY again.
Ware shoots 58.4%, 15.3 pts, 9.7 reb, 1.8 blk
Reese shoots 54.2%. Close, but no cigar. Also 13.9 pts, 9.7 reb, and 1.9 blk.
ACC has two that are basically there and two that are a little off in the shooting %:
Bacot is very close at 14 pts, 54.7%, 10.2 boards, 1.6 blocks
Ndongo 11.7 pts, 8.2 boards, 55.7%, 1.1 blocks
Filpowski is great but shoots "only" 50.7%.
PJ Hall is also great but only shoots 49.4%.
Big 12: only one, another guy we loved to hate:
Dickinson 18.2 pts, 11 boards, 55.2%, 1.4 blocks
Big East has three!
Kalkbrenner 17.2 pts, 7.3 boards, 65.2% FG, 3 blocks
Ighodaro 14 pts, 7.3 boards, 61.3%, 1.3 blocks
Oduro 16.2 pts, 7.1 boards, 55.8%, 1.4 blocks
SEC:
Broome 16.4 pts, 8.5 boards, 54.9%, 2.3 blocks
Samuel 13.7 pts, 7.6 boards, 56.6%, 1 blk
Aidoo 12.1 pts, 7.6 boards, 54.3%, 1.9 blk
PAC-12 has three, four if I dip to 0.8 blocks.
The guys that average that stat line are RARE. 17 guys on 80 teams across the best six conferences.
Barnhizer (Northwestern) hits three of the four marks, but his FG% is in the 40s. I don't remember it and I'm not looking it up now. But it is rare for anyone that is not a 5 to shoot 55%, and almost unheard of for anyone that is not a 4 or a 5. Other positions shoot too often from long range to have a chance of hitting at that rate.and most are centers
I’ve won this one. Pick you’re next topic lolHe’s at 9ppg and shooting his worst percentage this year (38%). He also had very little help when it came to guard play as Simpson, Davis and Fernandes have showed poor vision and an inability to setup teammates…just look what happened to Cliff’s game before Williams made his debut.
Mag wouldn’t need more shots to get to 10-12 ppg next year. He would excel even more offensively with the influx of talent and players that could feed him on cuts to the basket (one of his strengths).
Youre literally debating me on whether he’s capable of scoring 1 ppg more than he did this year lol.