Aundre Hyatt taking an official visit, still weighing 18 vs 19
- Thread starter kcg88
- Start date
Just rewatched the last four minutes of Rutgers versus Seton Hall!
Sanders jumper was automatic. Omoyuri played with the heart of four lions. Williams locked down Rodriguez.
I look forward to the ovation we give Sanders when he comes back to the Banks. So clutch in that game.
More importantly, a GREAT kid with a BRIGHT future.
Let's go, #3!
Sanders jumper was automatic. Omoyuri played with the heart of four lions. Williams locked down Rodriguez.
I look forward to the ovation we give Sanders when he comes back to the Banks. So clutch in that game.
More importantly, a GREAT kid with a BRIGHT future.
Let's go, #3!
My point is that you can't prove that every head coach knows EVERYTHING going on with his program at ALL times when it comes to things his assistants are doing any more than I can't prove that every head coach doesn't know EVERYTHING going on with his program at ALL times when it comes to things his assistants are doing.
So, the appropriate thing to do is not accuse every head coach of being aware of all of things his assistants are doing.
Also, in the case of Coach Taliaferro at Oklahoma it appeared to be a one time thing.
I don't know enough about the Capel situation to comment. I was just commenting on the "prove it" mentality.
Competent head coaches are aware of what's going on in their program - this isn't like an AD who isn't dealing with every athlete or recruit day to day, this is a HC who interacts with the players, recruits, and staff constantly. If there's a bad actor on their staff, they are either oblivious to the goings on within their program or they are looking the other way and insulating themselves from blowback.
One-off situations? Can totally understand it being done on the DL without the coach's knowledge. Something that's ongoing for months or years, or involving multiple players, or multiple staff members? Or has happened with different assistants at different coaching stops? In those situations, either the HC either is aware, or has no business running a program.
I would never accuse or state that I know something if I don't know. But watching from a distance, I certainly suspect. And I think that's a reasonable thing to do given how these things generally work. It's red mark on his record, but not enough to convict in the court of public opinion.
You are usually a classy poster. No need to take a cheap shot here. I think its a very reasonable thing for the average person to look at that situation and conclude that the HC was likely complicit. Of course we don't know that. But it's beneath you to say that the only reason people here are making that assumption is because one of our coaches got caught. We are better than that and so are you.
1. I did not say that was the only reason
2. I did not say it was everybody, precisely because some people here are better than that.
3. It's one thing to assume it is likely. I get that, but it's another thing for someone to make snarky comments about it as if it is a foregone conclusion that Capel knew and that by merely mentioning that there were actual investigations and Capel was not implicated in the violations.
Similar threads
