He does it for Texas possessions too wtf lolYeah i thought the rule is the pa guy doesnt talk besides announcing who scored
South Carolina is now bubblicious
The 50th best team making a miracle run to the final four isn’t an argument for expanding the tourney.I never heard announcer doing clock before. I have heard one minute left.
After UCLA making the Final Four from a play in game, beating MSU no less, there is a very strong argument for expanding tourney.
Being 18-12 and getting a double bye he saidIt seems possible since right now we have the tie breaker against Illinois Purdue Wisconsin OSU MSU... also Iowa Michigan... the top 7 other schools outside us. Wild.
If we finish top 4 and get a double bye in the B1G, the committee is not going to leave us out. They would look foolish. It would also mean they would be taking as many as 4 or 5 teams below us. The optics would be terrible and it would be disrespectful to the B1G as a conference to have the 4th place double bye team omitted.
I know none of this conference stuff is in the criteria, but it's still human beings making the decisions, and Rutgers would have enough to point to on their resume and say they desevrve to be in legitimately. Just like there will be warts to point to if you don’t think they should be in. The unique resume will only naturally make people think of the bigger picture when trying to decide if they deserve to be in
South Carolina is now bubblicious
Yup, that is indeed what we are discussingBeing 18-12 and getting a double bye he said
Iowa State gets a win. They're safe now. TCU has bad computer numbers and a very tough schedule the rest of the way even by Big 12 standards.
It's hard for all 4 MWC teams to make it I think. Possible, but 65/35 for 3 bids.Wyoming isnt a sure thing. Thats a really bad Q3 loss for them. Still in the field today probably as a 9 but have games at Col St and vs San Diego St among other landmines in conference play
It's hard for all 4 MWC teams to make it I think. Possible, but 65/35 for 3 bids.
He got the ball... he was just passing immediately or waiting to get doubled. Could have been more aggressive for sure. Had a chance to win the game passes it immediately instead of attacking
Update on this: one of the shot clocks in the arena was broken. So they turned them off for both teams and did it via PA.Yeah i thought the rule is the pa guy doesnt talk besides announcing who scored
3-3 would put us at 18-12 (12-8) going into the BIG tourney. We think (and are rooting for) OSU to do better than 3-4 the rest of the way with only 2 road games remaining but it’s still theoretically possible. Michigan State has a tough road ahead and could easily lose 3 more.Being 18-12 and getting a double bye he said
We don't have the tiebreaker against IL right now...It seems possible since right now we have the tie breaker against Illinois Purdue Wisconsin OSU MSU... also Iowa Michigan... the top 7 other schools outside us. Wild.
If we finish top 4 and get a double bye in the B1G, the committee is not going to leave us out. They would look foolish. It would also mean they would be taking as many as 4 or 5 teams below us. The optics would be terrible and it would be disrespectful to the B1G as a conference to have the 4th place double bye team omitted.
I know none of this conference stuff is in the criteria, but it's still human beings making the decisions, and Rutgers would have enough to point to on their resume and say they desevrve to be in legitimately. Just like there will be warts to point to if you don’t think they should be in. The unique resume will only naturally make people think of the bigger picture when trying to decide if they deserve to be in
They are 2 games ahead. Catching them is unlikely.We don't have the tiebreaker against IL right now...
To be clear, it’s not that likely to happen, and maybe not an outcome to root for. I’ll let BAC comment on that. Im not really sure. Its an odd, almost ironic situation where finishing ahead in the standings might hurt us.Being 18-12 and getting a double bye he said