But the profile at any point prior to Selection Sunday isn't meaningful. It doesn't matter if your profile got better or worse from February to March... there's no trend lines provided on the team sheets, just the total resume.
It matters to bracketologists who are adjusting their projected field day to day and week to week... but they aren't involved in the decision making, they're just trying to predict it. And any bracket created prior to the final one is pretty useless other than as a conversation piece.
The fact that one team went from a projected 6 seed to an 11 seed over the final month, or another went from out of the field to an 11 seed isn't supposed to matter to the committee - they only look at the final season result. Those two teams could end up with nearly identical resumes, Q1-Q4 records, home/away records, final SOS, etc... and the trend line isn't supposed to matter.
My feeling is that there should be some trend indicator for the committee on the team sheet showing how a single metric has changed over time (improving or sliding). With two nearly identical final resumes, I think the team that improved throughout the year should be rewarded over one that deteriorated over the year.