I HIGHLY doubt this is true. What 18 year old kid doesn't think he is better than he really is? For that matter, what 44 year old thinks that way too?
I think it is VERY unlikely Parker looked at Johnson and thought to himself ....wow that guy is better than me.
If any of this is true Nigel Johnson must have improved a TON over the past 10 months. kansas state was 15-17. They had a lot of underclassmen guards. He scored 87 points in 18 conference games.
It does not seem likely (possible, but not likely), that an 18-year-old kid would look at a red shirt kid in practice and decide he is never getting playing time.
However, though we do not know for sure about Nigel Johnson, saying he scored 87 points in 18 conference games does not tell the story.
Here are some of the facts that color that simple stat of 87 points in 18 conference games:
1) KSU was a team in complete turmoil in Johnson's Soph season - players getting strange playing time, players suspended at different times, players hurt also (remind you of some team - I do notice the irony).
2) Johnson was getting 15-20 minutes per game early in the season. Then, in late December, his playing time started to rise. And on January 3 he started for the 1st time. Then he got fewer than 10 minutes in each of the next 3 games. Then he got 15-20 minutes in each of the next 2-3 games. Then 4 minutes in the next game.
3) Johnson, as pointed out above, got incredibly inconsistent playing time, throughout the season. In games in which he got 20 minutes of playing time or more, his stats looked like this: 13 games, averaged 26 minutes per game in those 13 games in which he got 20 minutes or more of time, 121 points - 9.3 points per game, 38-84 FG (45%), 14-38 3-point FG (37%), 32-45 FT (71%).
4) In just the last 9 games, of which Johnson started 5, all Big 12 games, Johnson averaged 22.5 minutes per games, 8.2 points per game, 25-54 FG (46%), 8-21 3-point FG (38%), 16-23 FT (70%). In those 9 games, the last 9 games of the year, Johnson scored 74 of his 87 conference points. When given a consistent opportunity, though he did have games where he did little, he also produced more.
Better than Sanders? It does not appear so. Productive and an HUGE improvement over Daniels? Absolutely. Better than Mike Williams? Maybe, maybe not. Is it possible he could jump to a double digit scorer, and provide a much better 3-point threat than what RU currently has? Absolutely. Could he also improve to be even better than that? Sure he could - the leap to a 12-13 ppg scorer from 9 ppg scorer (when he gets 25+ minutes per game) is not THAT great a leap.