ADVERTISEMENT

Clearly, we don’t have a true, center presence

Rutgers defense was clueless against St.Johns weave offense. Rutgers should have tried switching to a zone defense.The Rutgers center position needs a lot of improvement because St.Johns got far too many offensive rebounds.Pitino is a outstanding coach attacking opponents weaknesses.Bailey and Harper had outstanding offensive games but got tired in the second half.Hayes should have played more minutes to add another scoring threat.I question why Martini didn't start and played far too few minutes.The Rutgers coaching staff has lots of issues to correct on offense and defense.
I agree. I blame the coaching decisions. E has no bb hands, can’t dunk, can’t rebound. I’m really afraid of the lack of a skilled 5 like you said against the better centers in the conference. Some of the guys coming off the bench needs more minutes and we need to figure out the defensive rebounding problem as it was very apparent last night that we have one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newbrunfus
JMike has worked on his shooting hard over the summer and from watching 2 practices he is shooting better . He hit a nice corner shot last night. What he has to stop doing is driving into trees !!!! His shot is much improved and you will see it in games. He is not a knock down shoote but improved. He did not play smart last night v

I know JMike had no one to pass last year but now he does. He needs to pass when he is driving into brick walls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Degaz-RU and goru7
Our center is big and strong but doesn't go up and attack the glass. That part I don't understand as he doesn't have much basketball skills but with his frame he should be a strong rebounder.
It’s a balance and gathering thing. Some players have to get balanced, gather, then move. Others are more explosive and attack quick. Ogbole takes time, even a split second means a lot.
 
Our center is big and strong but doesn't go up and attack the glass. That part I don't understand as he doesn't have much basketball skills but with his frame he should be a strong rebounder.
Position and hustle are a big part. Often I noticed that he was way up the lane and it wasn’t due to setting a screen. Shot would go up & he would just turn & not move towards the rim.

Contrast that with Martini who on one rebound started out behind the arc and ran at the basket, tracked the ball, beat the St. John’s player to it. He scored on a reverse layup and drew a foul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newbrunfus
Pike's program is built on defense. Every time we lose our top perimeter defenders our defense barely misses a beat. Length has been a big piece. Culture is definitely a big piece. The one constant has always been a shot blocking 5.

Last night was 1 game, but it just smacked me in the face how important the shot blocking 5 was.

Cliff definitely was frustrating at times on offense and you know if he stayed he wouldn't have liked a reduced role. There is no doubting in my mind how crucial him and Myles has been to our D.

I thought coming in to the season a Top 40 defense was likely even without him. I still don't want to take one game and change my thinking. Last night defintely had me worried about our defense in 2024-25. I believe 1 of 2 things has to happen.

1. Ogobole has to figure it out
2. Ace has to sacrifice for the team and be the defensive 5 and play D on the interior and play against guy that outweigh him by 70-100 pounds

No matter what happens Dylan and Ace have to buy in and attack the defensive glass AND Pike has to keep their minutes manageable.
Don't you think Caleb McConnell who was a back to back defensive player of the year or Co-DPOY, had a lot more to do with RUs defensive ranking, instead of the shot-blocking 5 man, who might not potentially score??

What matters more than shot blocking is not the shot blocking, it is whomever is going to grab the rebound, once the shot-blocker tries to block the shot??

The other factor that is lost with fans is your shot blocker is not always able to be a good defensive player, if that player picks up an early foul in the 1st half. How effective is a shot blocking big, if an opponent knows, he has to play passively and not pick up a 2nd early foul, or a 3rd foul early in the 2nd half??

Situations dictate defense. Not shot blocking players. You have to rebound, weak side to defend at a high level, which is where Caleb thrived and where RU needs to find that player.....It can't just be Derkack at 6'5", my guess is Dylan Grant and Bryce Dortch are the short and long term answers to weak side rebounding and athletic ability to battle against players a couple of inches taller.

I need to see more Martini and his willingness to scrap for a few minutes per game, while he hopefully scores on the other end.
 
We did dominate. St. John’s had their starters in the whole second half and after the first 7 minutes we dominated the game. They couldn’t handle us offensively. They only had an early lead because of offensive rebounding put backs. But the great news is our great freshman outplayed the older St. John’s starters for almost 30 minutes. Then Dylan got in foul trouble and then one shot and done or turnover and done and their big played great and ate. I am not concerned one bit about the final score or how we blew a comfortable lead on an exhibition game.

The concerning part is the rebounding or lack thereof. Big E wasted space last night defensively , offensively , not converting 2-3 times , and rebounding. Our guards surprising did not rebound at all nor did ACE. That is correction number #1. It was obvious from Pike ‘s post game presser that he hardly coached this game and let them have fun , ran almost no plays and ran high puck and roll with Dylan and Ace all night. So not a regular game at all. Pike also didn’t get everyone involved , did not play Grant and Dorsch and very suprised about Grant , since I saw him in practice 2 times and he is going help this team. Also , suprised Latham saw so little time with Big E struggling but again an exhibition. PJ not being on the floor enough in the second half was again because it was an exhibition. Pike was rewarding JMike and Jeremiah , who have been real good in practice and especially JMike who has made big strides ( could not tell yesterday with his 2-3 drives into the trees) but that was what Pike seemed to do.

Jordan , Pj , Martini, Grant and Latham , who were so little of last night except for PJ in the first half , will be big contributors to our team. Better Team defense in the paint and all 5 guys rebounding will improve the negatives we saw last night.

We also saw 2 NBA talents , something that has not been said around here in too damn long. The runs and incredible spurts this team will go on this year gives us a real chance to be there at the end and definitely contend for the BiG 10 championship .

Folks it was an exhibition. Glass is half full.
Not following the logic that Grant not playing in the scrimmage equates to him being a big contributor. If he can't even get into a scrimmage, he is likely way down the rotation and won't be a big contributor barring injury. Not everyone can be in the rotation. If Grant gets into the rotation, someone is coming out. Who would that be?

JMike has worked on his shooting hard over the summer and from watching 2 practices he is shooting better . He hit a nice corner shot last night. What he has to stop doing is driving into trees !!!! His shot is much improved and you will see it in games. He is not a knock down shoote but improved. He did not play smart last night v
He might be better off shooting a 3 or mid range jumper
 
Don't you think Caleb McConnell who was a back to back defensive player of the year or Co-DPOY, had a lot more to do with RUs defensive ranking, instead of the shot-blocking 5 man, who might not potentially score??

What matters more than shot blocking is not the shot blocking, it is whomever is going to grab the rebound, once the shot-blocker tries to block the shot??

The other factor that is lost with fans is your shot blocker is not always able to be a good defensive player, if that player picks up an early foul in the 1st half. How effective is a shot blocking big, if an opponent knows, he has to play passively and not pick up a 2nd early foul, or a 3rd foul early in the 2nd half??

Situations dictate defense. Not shot blocking players. You have to rebound, weak side to defend at a high level, which is where Caleb thrived and where RU needs to find that player.....It can't just be Derkack at 6'5", my guess is Dylan Grant and Bryce Dortch are the short and long term answers to weak side rebounding and athletic ability to battle against players a couple of inches taller.

I need to see more Martini and his willingness to scrap for a few minutes per game, while he hopefully scores on the other end.
We disagree here. Like most of the time the answer could be somewhere in between.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
Not following the logic that Grant not playing in the scrimmage equates to him being a big contributor. If he can't even get into a scrimmage, he is likely way down the rotation and won't be a big contributor barring injury. Not everyone can be in the rotation. If Grant gets into the rotation, someone is coming out. Who would that be?


He might be better off shooting a 3 or mid range jumper
I was lucky to watch 2 separate practices. Grant can shoot , he hustles, can cut to the basket where Ace found him for dunks a number of times , he can defend as well. Pike hardly played his freshman , except NBA guys , as Lathan I think did not play in second half. I would’ve very suprised if Grant doesn’t contribute positively this year.

JMike was shooting the 3 in drills much better. He has really been working on it. His weakness is when he is driving he always makes a decision that he is going to shoot it regardless of going into trees when he should be looking to pass. He has options and has to correct that part of his offensive game. Would be huge if he did.
 
We disagree here. Like most of the time the answer could be somewhere in between.
It's not complicated.....any coach is going to properly coach a player to play more cautiously and to not foul, if they're in foul trouble or needed on the court for other factors (offense, rebounding etc).....that doesn't mean that a player in foul trouble defends at a high level.

The RU problem is offense not shot blocking or defense.....it requires "reprogramming ", what paths to success means. It is the equivalent of RU fans trying to prioritize the 3rd and 4th DT spot or backup linebacker and ignoring the QB play.

An improved offensive center and offense overall, is what RU needs to evolve into a more complete program. If you want to limit the amount of energy spent on defense each possession, the easiest way to do so, is score more points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU84
Couple of thoughts:

Martini will play a lot when the matchup makes sense. He's probably our best defensive big, but has been pointed out he's not a rebounder.

I was shocked that Hayes was 'only' a 79% shooter from the stripe. The way it looked I figured he'd be approaching Cam Spencer levels.

I'm thinking unfair to judge Acuff coming off an injury but he did look bigger and slower than I expected. He was pretty poor on d when I was paying attention.

We've got two guys that can get a decent shot against anybody. Never had that before and it will help immensely in late game situations.
 
Based on watching the exhibition game I would be worried playing future teams that ran a similar St.Johns offense with player and ball movement that left wide open lanes for dribble drives to the basket or passes to the corners for open 3 point shots.Rutgers defenders failed to switch defensive assignments to stop the weave offense.Uconn runs a similar offense that is hard to defend.B1G Ten teams not so much with the traditional post player setting screens at the top of the key for guards to shoot 3 pointers or drives to the basket.
I don’t think the issue was so much the weave as it was St. John’s hit a bunch of 3s, and we extended our defense far beyond the arc to try to shut that down, and it spread us out and opened up a bunch of lanes to the basket.
 
It's not complicated.....any coach is going to properly coach a player to play more cautiously and to not foul, if they're in foul trouble or needed on the court for other factors (offense, rebounding etc).....that doesn't mean that a player in foul trouble defends at a high level.

The RU problem is offense not shot blocking or defense.....it requires "reprogramming ", what paths to success means. It is the equivalent of RU fans trying to prioritize the 3rd and 4th DT spot or backup linebacker and ignoring the QB play.

An improved offensive center and offense overall, is what RU needs to evolve into a more complete program. If you want to limit the amount of energy spent on defense each possession, the easiest way to do so, is score more points.
We dont need offense from a center with this team. I think we need a center that stops penetration and defensive rebounds. Everything else is gravy. EO can be that guy.
 
SJU looked like the Houston team we lost to in the tourney. They were hungry for rebounds.

Very confused why Davis was shooting the ball. 2 shots per game for him. No more. He was completely swallowed up every time he drove towards the hoop.
Davis must be told no driving into the trees. He got stuffed every time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Degaz-RU
Actually, pretty happy with the game, after all it was a charity game.
The two key freshman lived up to their hype and are the real deal.
Tranfers - Maritinni, Derkack and Hayes (My favorite) are going to play a big role in our success.
We can go 10 deep with little fall off.
Somerville showed moments of potential, great putback and then ran down and won fight for rebound. Big Body
Foul throw shooting looks like it can contribute 5+ points over last year.
JMike looked better than last year except when he drove into the trees.
Harper had no problems breaking the press.
Pike was experimenting with combinations and wanted to see that more than worrying about final score.
Las Vegas is going to be really SPECIAL
And JM Arena is going to be crazy all year long.
And I'm sure I missed a few other pluses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillyC80
Don't you think Caleb McConnell who was a back to back defensive player of the year or Co-DPOY, had a lot more to do with RUs defensive ranking, instead of the shot-blocking 5 man, who might not potentially score??

What matters more than shot blocking is not the shot blocking, it is whomever is going to grab the rebound, once the shot-blocker tries to block the shot??

The other factor that is lost with fans is your shot blocker is not always able to be a good defensive player, if that player picks up an early foul in the 1st half. How effective is a shot blocking big, if an opponent knows, he has to play passively and not pick up a 2nd early foul, or a 3rd foul early in the 2nd half??

Situations dictate defense. Not shot blocking players. You have to rebound, weak side to defend at a high level, which is where Caleb thrived and where RU needs to find that player.....It can't just be Derkack at 6'5", my guess is Dylan Grant and Bryce Dortch are the short and long term answers to weak side rebounding and athletic ability to battle against players a couple of inches taller.

I need to see more Martini and his willingness to scrap for a few minutes per game, while he hopefully scores on the other end.
Having Cliff's shot blocking enabled Caleb to be his best. He could take chances because he knew he had help if he didn't get there.
 
Cliff doesn’t have any offense either but he’s way to quick for Ogbole and fouling will be a huge problem. Ogbole may be fast from end line to end line but his reaction time is extremely slow.
He still looks like he was just dropped on the planet as a really tall alien, then put on a basketball court due to his height. He has no basketball instincts, no basketball IQ and no experience. He is so raw, Jay Young better get busy coaching him up because it is going to take a lot of work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newbrunfus
My hot take….Cliff would have had plenty of trouble defending Ejiofor. He still would have went off for a monster night.

Cliff always seemed to do poorly against a shorter big that moved well and better against bigger slower.

Obviously he would have made enough of a difference to get the W though and yes I miss him.
 
We dont need offense from a center with this team. I think we need a center that stops penetration and defensive rebounds. Everything else is gravy. EO can be that guy.

It’s this. There’s nothing else to say except even if he’s not the one grabbing the defensive board Ogbole is helping the halfcourt possession end without points for the opponent better than our other options right now. this much is clear as day and unfortunately the gap isn’t close. If we’re not pressing and playing gamble style (I.e. intention to steal the ball before it even gets to the paint - when you press you know there is a good chance your giving up points in transition when the traps don’t work so going smaller matters less).

I understand Lathan wasn’t out there long, but he was yanked because of how bad his D was. Martini plays hard and is excellent on the offensive glass but at least vs SJU he was just too small to defend their center. My guess is he will play the 5 when we apply full court pressure and he’s not in foul trouble.
 
Rutgers defense was clueless against St.Johns weave offense. Rutgers should have tried switching to a zone defense.The Rutgers center position needs a lot of improvement because St.Johns got far too many offensive rebounds.Pitino is a outstanding coach attacking opponents weaknesses.Bailey and Harper had outstanding offensive games but got tired in the second half.Hayes should have played more minutes to add another scoring threat.I question why Martini didn't start and played far too few minutes.The Rutgers coaching staff has lots of issues to correct on offense and defense.
Exactly
 
It’s this. There’s nothing else to say except even if he’s not the one grabbing the defensive board Ogbole is helping the halfcourt possession end without points for the opponent better than our other options right now. this much is clear as day and unfortunately the gap isn’t close. If we’re not pressing and playing gamble style (I.e. intention to steal the ball before it even gets to the paint - when you press you know there is a good chance your giving up points in transition when the traps don’t work so going smaller matters less).

I understand Lathan wasn’t out there long, but he was yanked because of how bad his D was. Martini plays hard and is excellent on the offensive glass but at least vs SJU he was just too small to defend their center. My guess is he will play the 5 when we apply full court pressure and he’s not in foul trouble.
20+ offensive rebounds contradicts this. He played the most minutes and it wasn’t pretty.

EO as a starting center is like Reiber being the starting 4, a fallacy people have convinced themselves will work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SBP
20+ offensive rebounds contradicts this. He played the most minutes and it wasn’t pretty.

EO as a starting center is like Reiber being the starting 4, a fallacy people have convinced themselves will work.

No - unfortunately it doesn’t tell you anything about Sommerville’s potential at center or Martini’s. I have no idea whether those boards were given up in the 21 minutes he played more than the 19 minutes he didn’t but even if the team gave up 40 offensive boards with Ogbole in the game - that still doesn’t tell you the other guys are better options. Remember - if your giving up uncontested easy baskets in the paint there is less need for offensive rebounds since the first shot attempt usually goes in. My guess is in Sommerville’s 7 minutes very few offensive boards were necessary and not for good reason.

Saying ogbole is the best 5 we’ve got right now is not the same as saying he’s good. We should’ve bought another role playing center with proven experience. Yes, even if that meant Sommerville was a flight risk. Thats the reality.
 
I agree. Sommerville’s flight risk shouldn’t have mattered one bit. Everything is year-to year now and there is no question we could have gotten a transfer who gave us more than Sommerville did two nights ago. However, it’s one game, it’s a scrimmage, and he clearly has lots of upside… as long as a substantial amount of that upside is reached this season. The only flight risk that should have mattered is Bailey and Harper.

Yes for sure. There’s certainly a chance that things start to click for him before the season ends. The problem as Green pointed out is with all these Vegas games - the potential to be 6-6 is there considering Lathan currently looks to not be playable against real competition. We needed to bring in someone with meaningful D1 experience - I understand we weren’t getting a star at our price point but even a utility player who Lathan would have had the potential to pass on the depth chart by Feb needed to be brought in even at risk of Lathan walking. Starting off the season reasonably strong is too important and Lathan is very far off from being able to contribute quality minutes right now. We don’t need a scorer at that position. We need someone who can play serviceable D and he’s miles from that at the moment unfortunately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and Mr Magoo
I mean… Big E’s sole purpose is to rebound. Pike sort of said that vailed criticism without mentioning his name. He didn’t have to. Envoy put rebounded because of positioning and flat out lack of quickness and nose for the ball… angles. It’s clearly something Jay has to address and I’m sure will be the prime focus. Any points he gets on our backs etc is gravy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatsam98
No - unfortunately it doesn’t tell you anything about Sommerville’s potential at center or Martini’s. I have no idea whether those boards were given up in the 21 minutes he played more than the 19 minutes he didn’t but even if the team gave up 40 offensive boards with Ogbole in the game - that still doesn’t tell you the other guys are better options. Remember - if your giving up uncontested easy baskets in the paint there is less need for offensive rebounds since the first shot attempt usually goes in. My guess is in Sommerville’s 7 minutes very few offensive boards were necessary and not for good reason.

Saying ogbole is the best 5 we’ve got right now is not the same as saying he’s good. We should’ve bought another role playing center with proven experience. Yes, even if that meant Sommerville was a flight risk. Thats the reality.
I didn't see Martini getting pushed around even though he's giving height and weight up compared to Ogbole. One has court IQ, the other not so much. One has a bulldog mentality, the other does not.

The staff made a monumental error here not bringing in an experienced big that could give them a consistent 8 & 8 most nights.
 
Big E just can’t rebound at all. I hope Lathan gets more minutes early on, he’s gonna need it. Martini may have major minutes at 5.
Everyone has legitimate reason to be concerned about the post. You can teach rebounding. You can’t teach shot making.

So I guess that’s a silver lining. We don’t have the thing you can teach and we do have the thing you can’t teach.
 
While sitting here watching Tottenham, decided to look at the center match up on the play by play between EO and the Johnnies kid.
In EO's first shift, he had two blocks and a rebound plus the one foul while SJ kid had a rebound and shot 0-3. In the next minute, against Martini, he had three rebounds and a basket.

EO's second stint on the court he had a rebound and the ST. JOHNS kid nothing in the matching minutes they were there together.

Third shift of the first half, EO had two points and a rebound while Zuby had a basket and two rebounds.

In the first half, matched up together the center position was a draw when EO was on the court. This was around 12 of EO's 21 minutes played
 
I didn't see Martini getting pushed around even though he's giving height and weight up compared to Ogbole. One has court IQ, the other not so much. One has a bulldog mentality, the other does not.

The staff made a monumental error here not bringing in an experienced big that could give them a consistent 8 & 8 most nights.
Take a look at my post, in the first minute against Martini, Zuby had as many points and more rebounds than he did in around 11 minutes against EO.
 
I mean… Big E’s sole purpose is to rebound. Pike sort of said that vailed criticism without mentioning his name. He didn’t have to. Envoy put rebounded because of positioning and flat out lack of quickness and nose for the ball… angles. It’s clearly something Jay has to address and I’m sure will be the prime focus. Any points he gets on our backs etc is gravy.

No - goal number one on defense is to prevent the initial possession attempt from resulting in points in the first place. He’s going to be in there because without him - penetrating the paint was just too easy and that’s how guys like Dylan get in foul trouble overcompensating. Once you force a miss - securing the board is the secondary goal.

I also think your oversimplifying. How many rebounds do you think Cliff averaged against teams like SJU? Before you answer consider that his overall stats (8 rpg) are inflated by gaudy performances against horrible cupcakes (Bryant, Howard, Stonehill, etc.) and small power conf teams like Michigan. He also played 5+ more minutes than Ogbole played yesterday on average. I get it - 4 rebounds in 21 minutes isn’t an impressive stat line but there is no sign that we have a better option but to hope he settles in because we’re not going to press the whole game. We have no other answer in halfcourt D sets when Ogbole sits. At least that’s how it seemed.
 
While sitting here watching Tottenham, decided to look at the center match up on the play by play between EO and the Johnnies kid.
In EO's first shift, he had two blocks and a rebound plus the one foul while SJ kid had a rebound and shot 0-3. In the next minute, against Martini, he had three rebounds and a basket.

EO's second stint on the court he had a rebound and the ST. JOHNS kid nothing in the matching minutes they were there together.

Third shift of the first half, EO had two points and a rebound while Zuby had a basket and two rebounds.

In the first half, matched up together the center position was a draw when EO was on the court. This was around 12 of EO's 21 minutes played
I'm not doing the second half, but it was similar. Also, just saw the plus minuses for the game for the first time. Ogbole led the team with a plus 13, followed by Davis at plus 12.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillyC80 and Scangg
I'm not doing the second half, but it was similar. Also, just saw the plus minuses for the game for the first time. Ogbole led the team with a plus 13, followed by Davis at plus 12.

Thanks for doing the homework. Good stuff. Og has cracks in his game for sure and will not be Cliff. However some are going overboard with the targeting of his play. I even saw a post saying he couldn't dunk 😳. Rebounding is also a team function. It does little good to have one big guy set to rebound if the rest of the team is also not boxing/shielding/positioning against their men. Also, it you have a guy like Richmond who is superior at getting to the rim, when your center must lag to meet him.... it takes defensive help/support to protect & rebound the backside.

As good as the team potential looks on offense with the 2 studs.... there is still work to do on defensive technique, switching and situational awareness. Going to take some time to gel and figure out the right pieces.....if anyone can figure it out on the defensive end.....it's Pike.
 
I'm not doing the second half, but it was similar. Also, just saw the plus minuses for the game for the first time. Ogbole led the team with a plus 13, followed by Davis at plus 12.
Basic +/- doesn't account for their actual contribution. Ogbole benefitted from being on the court more with Ace and/or Dylan. Here are a couple of player specific stats:

- Ogbole was 2nd worst in Net Points at -5.3, (4.6 produced, 9.9 allowed) while Martini was 0.1 and Sommervile at -2.1.
- Ogbole 3rd worst Defensive Rating at 126.3, Martini - 142.3 (4th best) and Sommerville - 156.8 (Tied 1st).
- Ogbole and Martinin had the same number of boards - 4. Except all of Ogbole's were offensive and 3 of Martini's were defensive. This is due to Ogbole being out of position a lot defensively. And this is a continuation of last year where 70/80% of Ogbole's rebounds were offensive.
- Ogbole had a 9 efficiency, while Martini was 7.
-They had very similar game scores, 4.8 vs 4.5
 
Basic +/- doesn't account for their actual contribution. Ogbole benefitted from being on the court more with Ace and/or Dylan. Here are a couple of player specific stats:

- Ogbole was 2nd worst in Net Points at -5.3, (4.6 produced, 9.9 allowed) while Martini was 0.1 and Sommervile at -2.1.
- Ogbole 3rd worst Defensive Rating at 126.3, Martini - 142.3 (4th best) and Sommerville - 156.8 (Tied 1st).
- Ogbole and Martinin had the same number of boards - 4. Except all of Ogbole's were offensive and 3 of Martini's were defensive. This is due to Ogbole being out of position a lot defensively. And this is a continuation of last year where 70/80% of Ogbole's rebounds were offensive.
- Ogbole had a 9 efficiency, while Martini was 7.
-They had very similar game scores, 4.8 vs 4.5
Well, yes and no it doesn't account for their actual contribution because it accounts for everything that happened while they were on the floor. If Ogbole was -5 net in his match up it was because of two late baskets. I only looked at his time on court w Zuby. Would love to see where these number came from, you have a link?
Isn't a lower defensive rating a better score? 126, while very bad, would be better than 142 or 153.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: -RUFAN4LIFE-
Well, yes and no it doesn't account for their actual contribution because it accounts for everything that happened while they were on the floor. If Ogbole was -5 net in his match up it was because of two late baskets. I only looked at his time on court w Zuby. Would love to see where these number came from, you have a link?
Isn't a lower defensive rating a better score? 126, while very bad, would be better than 142 or 153.
I'll have to go back and look after the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seansherm
While sitting here watching Tottenham, decided to look at the center match up on the play by play between EO and the Johnnies kid.
In EO's first shift, he had two blocks and a rebound plus the one foul while SJ kid had a rebound and shot 0-3. In the next minute, against Martini, he had three rebounds and a basket.

EO's second stint on the court he had a rebound and the ST. JOHNS kid nothing in the matching minutes they were there together.

Third shift of the first half, EO had two points and a rebound while Zuby had a basket and two rebounds.

In the first half, matched up together the center position was a draw when EO was on the court. This was around 12 of EO's 21 minutes played
Well this destroys some arguments. The problem is Ogbole looks so unnatural out there that his mistakes stand out more i think

I'm not doing the second half, but it was similar. Also, just saw the plus minuses for the game for the first time. Ogbole led the team with a plus 13, followed by Davis at plus 12.
👀

Basic +/- doesn't account for their actual contribution. Ogbole benefitted from being on the court more with Ace and/or Dylan. Here are a couple of player specific stats:

- Ogbole was 2nd worst in Net Points at -5.3, (4.6 produced, 9.9 allowed) while Martini was 0.1 and Sommervile at -2.1.
- Ogbole 3rd worst Defensive Rating at 126.3, Martini - 142.3 (4th best) and Sommerville - 156.8 (Tied 1st).
- Ogbole and Martinin had the same number of boards - 4. Except all of Ogbole's were offensive and 3 of Martini's were defensive. This is due to Ogbole being out of position a lot defensively. And this is a continuation of last year where 70/80% of Ogbole's rebounds were offensive.
- Ogbole had a 9 efficiency, while Martini was 7.
-They had very similar game scores, 4.8 vs 4.5
Net points if you factor in time on the court make Lathan look worse

A higher defensive rating is bad, obviously

Lathan is not 1st. He is last. That is a horrific number.

Ogbole is not last. He is the best of the 5's by a wide margin
 
  • Like
Reactions: -RUFAN4LIFE-
Basic +/- doesn't account for their actual contribution. Ogbole benefitted from being on the court more with Ace and/or Dylan. Here are a couple of player specific stats:

- Ogbole was 2nd worst in Net Points at -5.3, (4.6 produced, 9.9 allowed) while Martini was 0.1 and Sommervile at -2.1.
- Ogbole 3rd worst Defensive Rating at 126.3, Martini - 142.3 (4th best) and Sommerville - 156.8 (Tied 1st).
- Ogbole and Martinin had the same number of boards - 4. Except all of Ogbole's were offensive and 3 of Martini's were defensive. This is due to Ogbole being out of position a lot defensively. And this is a continuation of last year where 70/80% of Ogbole's rebounds were offensive.
- Ogbole had a 9 efficiency, while Martini was 7.
-They had very similar game scores, 4.8 vs 4.5
I cannot comment on a lot of your stats - since I never heard of the "net" points stats, or the defensive rating calculations - have no idea how they are calculated.

I can say that your 3rd bullet point is an error (and therefore your conclusion, which even if correct, is also erroneous based on the stats you cited, at least). You got it reversed: Ogbole had 4 DEFENSIVE rebounds, and Martini had 3 OFFENSIVE rebounds - and Martini scored both his baskets directly off 2 of his offensive rebounds.
 
St John's is ranked 27, and may be a sweet sixteen team.. There are lots to be gained and learned from this loss. I could go into detail but a lot has already been covered. Lathan will be playing the majority of center minutes by midseason. Look for some 35 plus point games from Ace.. Dylan should have been taken out for awhile after the 4th foul. he had to slack off on defense, and was a little tired in crunch time.. too many late errors for Will, who needs to be a leader in crunch time. And EO is not a dish off option, take the shot yourself. He has improved, but way too many 2nd and 3rd chance opportunities (aka garbage buckets) for St Johns.. Rutgers will be a tournament team and should win over 60% of its games in the Big Ten. need to play Deck & Hayes more, especially down the stretch
Great analysis. Hayes is as pure as it gets. Vital to get him looks.
 
Okay help me out... which teams on our schedule have a center that will give us problems?
 
I cannot comment on a lot of your stats - since I never heard of the "net" points stats, or the defensive rating calculations - have no idea how they are calculated.

I can say that your 3rd bullet point is an error (and therefore your conclusion, which even if correct, is also erroneous based on the stats you cited, at least). You got it reversed: Ogbole had 4 DEFENSIVE rebounds, and Martini had 3 OFFENSIVE rebounds - and Martini scored both his baskets directly off 2 of his offensive rebounds.
I went and looked at the rebounds and StatBroadcast has two different things between their game log and the analytics section.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT