I stated this in football and it applies in basketball......fans deem recruiting success based on how long they have heard about the prospect and any information associated with the prospect, more than the actual ability or skill-set of the prospect..... OR that the most reported or highly recruited player by the staff is always the best/preferred target, which is an assumption that more often is wrong vs right.
RU landed a quality Big man recruit back in the spring but because he arrived on the RU publicity scene late and was not known about, he's treated as a non-issue or nothing is expected of him. ....it's not the same, but the concept fans here have is they are more concerned with what coaches are recruiting what players, so they can claim winning the press conference of recruiting during the offseason, more than the actual games itself....
There is zero and truly zero concern about the quality of the staff and ability to land or scout/locate talent....what some historical RU fans are going to rehash were the misses in past years that were the most popular local recruit, and apply it here, which would be a stretch. We experienced this last spring, with Jose Alvarado, who was more popular and deemed local "must have" recruit at PG.....on the other hand Geo Baker was not considered local and is bigger/taller and more athletic scorer than Alvarado is and can eventually play some PG for the program. You win some and you don't, but the reality is I would not trade Baker for Alvarado straight up, since he can play both guard positions....in this case, the question is can McClung or the other guard we land ( if it's not Mathis), be a true B1G guard with the size necessary in this league.....assuredly it is still yes, whether it's the most known about or reported on recruit or not.