-----The Big Ten could have proposed we pay them $5m a year for the first 7 years of the contract and it would have still made sense to take the deal. It is what it is.
And carrying it to them in bags of pennies, if necessary
-----The Big Ten could have proposed we pay them $5m a year for the first 7 years of the contract and it would have still made sense to take the deal. It is what it is.
We'll it's apparent we're going to give the other approach a shot. Since we didn't get a front loaded contract, nor a stipend to travel our teams, nor are we willing to borrow against future earnings. See you in ten years, I really hope our strategy pays off. It doesn't help that you have a benefactor like UA pumping millions into your athletic department does it. Why did you get all those concessions again? So you can start building all those shinny new toys sooner? WOW, I guess we really did get screwed.So the front loaded money has got us a new coach and this new football facility, that we want now, not 10 years from now:
We'll it's apparent we're going to give the other approach a shot. Since we didn't get a front loaded contract, nor a stipend to travel our teams, nor are we willing to borrow against future earnings. See you in ten years, I really hope our strategy pays off. It doesn't help that you have a benefactor like UA pumping millions into your athletic department does it. Why did you get all those concessions again? So you can start building all those shinny new toys sooner? WOW, I guess we really did get screwed.