That foul was the dumbest thing Pike has done in his entire career here. That was just awful, stupid strategy. If you are in the double bonus.. maybe? In the single bonus. He deserved to lose for that.
Or will this season be the opposite of last season and we are like the 25th best team and manage to miss the ****ing tournament somehow.We are showing we can compete with the good teams.
Very good chance our season will come down to games vs Minnesota, Nebraska and Northwestern.
Do we take care of business and got 4-1 or better?
We are showing we can compete with the good teams.
Very good chance our season will come down to games vs Minnesota, Nebraska and Northwestern.
Do we take care of business and got 4-1 or better?
i hate to say it.....1st thing that went thru my mind......we made the tournament last year because Ron made a half court shot. will we miss because a half court shot was hit on us.Or will this season be the opposite of last season and we are like the 25th best team and manage to miss the ****ing tournament somehow.
wasnt impressed at all with OSU. we were very comfortable in our half court offense and i dont like their guards.thats my take. Not totally sure what to make of Ohio State. I dont think they are that good and they will be better later in the year. Still I thought the way the game went showed some moxy from this team. Three games on road, 3 losses but we are certainly getting closer to breaking through
We need to take care of business against the sisters of the poor this year, last year we had two big egoes that were not always mentally there
Or will this season be the opposite of last season and we are like the 25th best team and manage to miss
wasnt impressed at all with OSU. we were very comfortable in our half court offense and i dont like their guards.
Indiana (I think) is much better
Paul needs to be back in the starting lineup. I was really surprised he wasn't tonight. Caleb came off the bench first game then back to starting. Thought we would see the same with Paul, especially on the roadI think OSU isnt that good defensively. One big negative was the early turnovers. Cut them out and we win tonight. Cliff has to play a 40 minute game..right now he is only showing up for one half after generally brutal first halfs...is it 3 games now
Paul needs to be back in the starting lineup. I was really surprised he wasn't tonight. Caleb came off the bench first game then back to starting. Thought we would see the same with Paul, especially on the road
Yes, it's been described as 50/50, but usually they areI know the analytics people say it is a 50/50 tossup whether to foul up 3 with that much time , 7.7 on the clock.
I say bring back the same 3 refs for that game and let the RAC have its way with 'em too.Would love to blow OSU out at the RAC
Not sure.. committing a foul trying to get the rebound would also be a disaster.Pulling players off the line another egregious error and on Pike.
Still would prefer that to the darn 3Not sure.. committing a foul trying to get the rebound would also be a disaster.
A one point loss to Ohio State isnt going to ding the NET at all in the long ru
I don't think I have ever seen a bigger blown call on a blatant rule violation to decide outcome of a game in sports. Particularly because this a rule, not judgment call, and he was no where near inbounds.Sorry BAC. That’s such an awful take! The bottom line is absolutely not that, “Rutgers didn’t get it done”. That’s a ridiculous spin. In such a close game on the road against a Top 25 team, refs matter.
The story of this game was the travesty of the refs. The B1G refs stole a game from RU.
1. Time on clock was extremely suspect from amount of time elapsed to not starting on rebound.
2. Dribbler stepped on line.
3. Shooter ran out of bounds of own volition.
4. Shooter can’t be first to catch pass after out of bounds.
5. Shooter never established inbounds before catching ball.
6. Shooter still looked out.
7. Refs didn’t review.
A travesty of errors. As someone noted above, rest of the game doesn’t matter.
Refs should be banned. B1G has to address this. The story was RU was hosed, jobbed. Inexcusable!
Cliff had a nice 2nd half.
Spencer was great.
Hyatt looks like he is improving.
Paul was clutch with foul shots.
Fouls in first half again were ridiculous against RU!
Pattern here?
Repeat after me BAC. Refs matter and especially where RU is concerned, it has never evened out. This game could cost us a seed or even making the tourney.
We’ll have to listen to Sports writers for a month that RU can’t win on the road.
We would have been 1st place in the B1G until after New Years! B1G and refs took that all away from us. That’s the bottom line!!! Travesty
Not sure.. committing a foul trying to get the rebound would also be a disaster.
Paul Cam Caleb Mag Cliff is still my starting 5good point, I think Pike thought he can get by and give confidence to Cam but at this point why. Now the question is does which of the 3, goes to the bench, does Cam still start over Hyatt and Mag. I say yes
certainly, when you KNOW they have to shoot the three....just play smart and tough defense....don't foul, but have the team play to stop a threeI just LOATHE fouling on the 3...you are up 3 and you have the best defense in the country. Let them beat you
I hate nobody lined up for the rebound. You tell them do not try to force anything or go over the back but you take some time off the clock not allowing them to grab the board uncontested and get momentum going up the courtNot sure.. committing a foul trying to get the rebound would also be a disaster.
And Crean was spot on with his comments. Put extra pressure on Caleb on the FT and for what? Nothing I hated more than shooting technical FTs with no one on the line. Surprised we didn’t send a memo to OSU to pull their guys too. 🤦♂️Not sure.. committing a foul trying to get the rebound would also be a disaster.
Last play wasn't poorly defended at all. Caleb was awesome forcing the OSU guard out-of-bounds without fouling and the shot itself was an illegal play. Refs f'd-up both.
Paul Cam Caleb Mag Cliff is still my starting 5
I think it is asking a lot for the player to keep track of time remaining to give the foul....Agree on the single bonus. Ended up not mattering since Caleb hit the first, but was a bad move. Before the play even happened I said only foul if 3 seconds.
Hey Wheeze! But wait at least until the ball crosses half court? Very, very bad.I think it is asking a lot for the player to keep track of time remaining to give the foul....
better if the coach said wait for me to yell foul, if that was possible.
Hey Z-man!Hey Wheeze! But wait at least until the ball crosses half court? Very, very bad.
so says coach of the yearI just LOATHE fouling on the 3...you are up 3 and you have the best defense in the country. Let them beat you
I think Mag was told foul as soon as he crosses midcourt to avoid any chance of his man trying to draw a foul in the act of shootingToo many turnovers and too many offensive fouls. That crap drives me nuts.
The immediate foul by Mag at the end is a low IQ play. The team can't afford sloppy play.
Cam played well and Hyatt was under control.
Curious--what is the wiggle room re: unintentional out-of-bounds violation?the refs have wiggle room on what happened at the end....they can say that the eventual shooter went out of bounds unintentionally and came back in, this is legal...
it may not be true, but it is the excuse after the fact
now, if the previous dribbler walked, or stepped out of bounds, there we have a legit
Curious--what is the wiggle room re: unintentional out-of-bounds violation?
Refs would be b.s.'ing then, which wouldn't be surprising re: cya. Clearly him drifting out-of-bounds had nothing to do with momentum--he wasn't running to or diving for the ball, he lost track of where he was on the floor, assuming it wasn't by design.first off, I think we got screwed, not defending the call
the wiggle room is part b.....even though that the eventual shooter was way out of bounds, both feet well out, if they determine his momentum carried him out, he could come back in and get the ball..... if you read part b as it is, its pretty clear
again, I don't believe it was a momentum thing, but the refs can now say that was it.....very unfair to us
you must be right....I have not seen a replay from an angle that would show his movement properly....the live shot was not that conclusive....Refs would be b.s.'ing then, which wouldn't be unsurprising re: cya. Clearly him drifting out-of-bounds had nothing to do with momentum--he wasn't running to or diving for the ball, he lost track of where he was on the floor, assuming it wasn't by design.