After the TCU player stepped out of bounds but it’s not reviewable.
Sound familiar?
Sound familiar?
Georgetown loses on prayer 3
- Thread starter RUBubba
- Start date
I saw it and immediately thought this was the same thing that happened to us last year at Ohio State. I thought the NCAA was going to make a change in the rules for looking at a replay when something like this happens. It was a shame for us what happened and now tonight Georgetown got the shaft when the TCU player made a three at the buzzer to win the game when he clearly stepped out of bounds before he shot the ball. This should have been TCU's first loss and now they are still unbeaten.
The Yale-Vermont ending was even worse. Yale up 5 with 3.8 seconds. Vermont layup at 0.6 followed by an obvious flop called a foul on the inbound. Inbounder travels (uncalled) and Vermont hits a desperation 3. Ref calls a phantom foul and Vermont completes the 4 point play for the win. Three missed/bad calls in a the space of a minute by the refs. Richard Kent must be livid.
The inbounder walking the baseline was the most hilarious part (after he even checked with the ref beforehand).
Yale should have just thrown it deep with .6 left in order to not be subjected to subjectivity.
In fairness to the refs, Vermont looks like they had a nice turnout.🤣
I watched it live. Even the announcers were sure it was going to be called off and were stunned when it wasn’t. Why is that not part of a review? Imagine in real life reviewing security footage for a certain crime and seeing another and being like na that crime isn’t reviewable by video if we didn’t charge them with it before watching it.
If the ref missed it to begin with then there is no probable cause. It’s in the Constitution. Ain’t America just the bestest and most justest place ever?
Similar threads
