If you don't contribute to NIL then you have no right to complain that RU football isn't better.
Horrific NIL Numbers
- Thread starter BOGDANOVICH
- Start date
UCF Emerges as First Power Four School to Eliminate NIL Collective Program
Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) has taken hold of college athletes, providing a means for financial stability for student-athletes. In a recent shift, the Univwww.si.com
This is an important article. Payments to athletes is going to change significantly once the NCAA settlement agreement is reached.
I hope that settlement the leads to meaningful regulation of boosters and how/when private money flows to the student athletes.
I believe that will either take federal legislation and/or a deal made with a players union. Unfortunately, a players union doesn’t yet exist.
I'll agree with you re. people not contributing any or less bc of GS (myself included), but the majority of people on this board are so against NIL, i doubt they'd contribute if the staff consisted of Saban, Belechieck, Vince Lombardi and Parcells
Yeah and you cheap fvcks will move the goalposts again. Moreover, no one is buying out GS’s contract to get rid of him.
Last edited:
it's hard to be for something when you've got a HC that had Vedral under center for 3yrs and then wanted Gav despite the obvious issues. Let's not forget the schemes, coaching decisions, etc etc etc ....
NIL isn't the issue and with a better coach that the populace could rally around, that NIL dynamic changes. Of course RU need to reevaluate how they go about raising those numbers but then again, RU is managed by some pretty bad people so not expecting much there.
Hell if we had a coach like Cig and he rattled off a bunch of wins, that 5yr promise I just did to my grad school would be going to Rutgers! Get us a coach and then we can talk wallets
The real issue is we don't have very many big wallet alums willing to contribute which leaves guys like Brown having too much say.
Not disagreeing with any of that
But a lot of people on the board are adamantly against NIL and refuse to donate, even though they know it's the key to success (or lack thereof)
Yet, despite this, they are the ones complaining the loudest
that assumes NIL is the reason we lost 3 out of 4 games we should have won and 1 out of the four we looked utterly lost and didn't know it was Saturday from Monday. NIL isn't the reason the depth is bad and said depth players look so woefully prepared or even understanding of where they belong on various sets.
NIL is the convenient scapegoat for the guys that refuse to look at Greg objectively.
kicker is I would love Greg as AD, LOVE him there
Similar threads
