You're picking individual games. Overall, the B10 showed that they were overrated based on their showing in the tourney. If you want to make a case that earlier in the year, the B10 had a winning record against OC teams, that's fine, but when it counted, the B10 fell short. And to go back to your Oral Roberts example, they were better than Ohio State because they beat them on the floor. Maybe one team was better than the other earlier in the season, maybe not, and maybe Oral Roberts would have finished in the top 3, maybe not, but that's just speculation and any stats you might want to use to prove your point don't matter because they are based on what happened before the tourney. Results on the court are all that matter.