It was evident to me that they were much faster than we were. Their superior Fieldhouse provided them with the edge to recruit better players. Their players executed, and we didn’t execute as well.
Are we making a New Year's resolution? 😉I bet their coaches schemed a 17 point comeback in that thing!
What did Politi say about the fieldhouse? Key factor in yesterday's loss?There goes Al screaming at the clouds again.
I will. But as you see I responded to the thread not the individual. I think thats what you lawyers call a loophole.Are we making a New Year's resolution? 😉
I just hung myself in my own loophole. But I rarely think of myself as an attorney. As one of my esteemed professors at law school said, patent attorneys are not really attorneys, they are engineers and scientists with law degrees. I was not offended, and happy with that characterization.I will. But as you see I responded to the thread not the individual. I think thats what you lawyers call a loophole.
Ha classic.!I bet their coaches schemed a 17 point comeback in that thing!
At least. Probably worth 24 points - don't sell that thing short.I bet their coaches schemed a 17 point comeback in that thing!
no, which is why they’re no good.Do the NY Giants or NY Jets have a fieldhouse?
Just wondering ...
There wouldn’t have been a 17 point comeback if we had better players, which a Fieldhouse would have facilitated. Only landed 2 of NJs Top 10 this recruiting cycle. Recruits are speaking with their decisions.I bet their coaches schemed a 17 point comeback in that thing!
Both dono, which is why they’re no good.
Perhaps with a field house AND a real head coach the game would have been closer.There wouldn’t have been a 17 point comeback if we had better players, which a Fieldhouse would have facilitated. Only landed 2 of NJs Top 10 this recruiting cycle. Recruits are speaking with their decisions.
Gavin Sidwar, our ‘26 QB recruit decommitted from Rutgers and may be going to Syracuse, among other places.
Like with McCord, top recruits go where they can shine. On offense, they don’t come to play for GS, and the Taj Mahal of Fieldhouses wouldn’t change a damn thing.There wouldn’t have been a 17 point comeback if we had better players, which a Fieldhouse would have facilitated. Only landed 2 of NJs Top 10 this recruiting cycle. Recruits are speaking with their decisions.
Gavin Sidwar, our ‘26 QB recruit decommitted from Rutgers and may be going to Syracuse, among other places.
Korey Duff came to play for Schiano, as did Ian Strong. Need more overall talent or live with the mediocre results.Like with McCord, top recruits go where they can shine. On offense, they don’t come to play for GS, and the Taj Mahal of Fieldhouses wouldn’t change a damn thing.
Yea Gavin’s decommitment and the 17 point comeback werent field house related. Was awful offensive schemes that didn’t take advantage of the skills our young receiving corps have.There wouldn’t have been a 17 point comeback if we had better players, which a Fieldhouse would have facilitated. Only landed 2 of NJs Top 10 this recruiting cycle. Recruits are speaking with their decisions.
Gavin Sidwar, our ‘26 QB recruit decommitted from Rutgers and may be going to Syracuse, among other places.
Yea Gavin’s decommitment and the 17 point comeback werent field house related. Was awful offensive schemes that didn’t take advantage of the skills our young receiving corps have.
Not saying a field house wouldn’t be useful. But it is the least of our worries at this point.
Show your work. Did the recruiting classes significantly increase when that building opened in 2015?The #1 issue is the lack of talent. People aren’t supporting NIL to the extent needed.
The Fieldhouse would have made it easier to recruit receivers who actually catch the ball, and quarterbacks who can throw accurately. Too many drops and inaccurate throws.
This was a game where we needed to score 48, because the defense wasn’t stopping anyone.
When you put up 41 points, the issue isn’t offensive schemes.
We were outplayed by Kansas State. Tip of the hat to them.
Huh? Were not a good tight end away from a national title?The #1 issue is the lack of talent. People aren’t supporting NIL to the extent needed.
The Fieldhouse would have made it easier to recruit receivers who actually catch the ball, and quarterbacks who can throw accurately. Too many drops and inaccurate throws.
This was a game where we needed to score 48, because the defense wasn’t stopping anyone.
When you put up 41 points, the issue isn’t offensive schemes.
We were outplayed by Kansas State. Tip of the hat to them.
It was evident to me that they were much faster than we were. Their superior Fieldhouse provided them with the edge to recruit better players. Their players executed, and we didn’t execute as well.
Sadly, the more people who push this rhetoric and the longer they do it, fans will eventually believe it is their fault for not purchasing the best players and/or facilities to ensure success for their team.The #1 issue is the lack of talent. People aren’t supporting NIL to the extent needed.
He’s helped by having a championship caliber infrastructure at Kansas State.Kansas St also has a coach who has won multiple national championships. I don't care that it was at a level below.
The results on the field show they had better talent . The recruiting rankings you’re citing are arbitrary and capricious.Show your work. Did the recruiting classes significantly increase when that building opened in 2015?
That team that just beat us had an average class recruiting ranking of 54.2
YR. Nat rank
2015: 54
2016: 72
2017: 57
2018: 66
2019: 63
2020: 54
2021: 57
2022: 62
2023: 40
2024: 58
Didn’t seem to be anything more than better coaching. Talent was actually below our level.
Once again you move the goalposts AL. When you get shown data. You say it's flawed. When you show similar data it's dogma. And if the data is so flawed stop pointing to it when you say we have studs coming in and sighting that we only got 2 nj top 10’s. It’s flawed after all. It’s only arbitrary and capricious when it doesn’t fit your agenda.The results on the field show they had better talent . The recruiting rankings you’re citing are arbitrary and capricious.
If the fans don’t provide the support, the teams aren’t going to win. If people want better results, they have to increase their support.Sadly, the more people who push this rhetoric and the longer they do it, fans will eventually believe it is their fault for not purchasing the best players and/or facilities to ensure success for their team.
The results on the field show the data was erroneous. Infrastructure isn’t the be all end all, but it helps in recruiting.Once again you move the goalposts AL. When you get shown data. You say it's flawed. When you show similar data it's dogma. Poeple aren't decommiting or not commiting at all because of infrastructure alone. Gavin deommited because he realized his talents wouldn't be utilized appropriately by our offensive scheme.
Or it shows that we got out coached. And the erroneous data is more telling in my assertions than yours.The results on the field show the data was erroneous. Infrastructure isn’t the be all end all, but it helps in recruiting.
It wasn’t the coaches that ran faster, missed throws or dropped balls or took bad angles, it was the players. Kansas State was clearly more talented.Or it shows that we got out coached. And the erroneous data is more telling in my assertions than yours.
Shows that someone isn’t the best evaluator. Or is he the only one that gets the good/ bad data?
Once again simple logic escapes you. It is the same coaching staff that evaluated and recruited a less talented group of players and turned that same 60th recruiting class into a more talented group.? See how that works?It wasn’t the coaches that ran faster, missed throws or dropped balls or took bad angles, it was the players. Kansas State was clearly more talented.