are you ponying up the extra $2 million to bring the next head coach salary to $4 million for a dynamic coach that has won recently. Do you realize that this job is near the bottom of Power 5 jobs
Vince Lombardi could come in here with Bill Walsh as his OC and Hoodie as his DC and he isn't beating OSU, Mich or MSU in the next 3-4 seasons. This is a total rebuild as this point.
That can't be the metric for evaluating a potential candidate.
What Schiano forgot how to coach in 2 years.
Houstons guy is going to end up somewhere else. Too many more attractive opportunities even if we pony up the dough. Im sure we will try to get him - so will most of the other teams with openings.Schiano as HC and DC, bring back the fast aggressive defense of old and make a mark on the league (let's start knocking out some QBs again, wouldn't you have loved to see Hamilton and Longa in a schiano coached D). That frees up some money for a top notch OC. How awesome would it be to see GS lead the team out of the tunnel on opening day for the first time back on the banks to finish what he started.
Or get the guy from Houston who is 10-0.
Many, including myself, would say he never really could coach all that well while he was here. He wasn't some guru. He built us up to a level and plateaued. Deal with it. Let's move forward and get away from the retreadsWhat Schiano forgot how to coach in 2 years.
While I agree that we are a ways off from beating OSU or probably Michigan, it is not a total rebuild. With a good coaching staff you have the following pieces in place:
QB - Rettig (upside) or Laviano (experience) Also Dare and Russo waiting.
RB - Two potential studs
WR - I don't think this group has been developed or used properly and has way more potential then they have shown.
DL - Experience and a stud in Hamilton (assuming he doesn't transfer)
DB - Despite the struggles this year - this group is very young and getting a lot of experience.
My point is there are some very important pieces in place.
It's almost impossible to know. How do you separate out groups that are under-performing because of talent or groups that are under-performing because of coaching/schemes? Looking at recruiting rankings we're going to be pretty damn far down the list of talented teams the next couple of years. I think people will wind up shocked at how little talent we actually have. Sure we have experience at DL, do we have any talent? At DB, they are young and a couple look to be OK, but we're still thin and not particularly talented.
If you look across this team and then compare to any other big Ten team we play, we might possibly have a talent advantage at RB over some of the teams we play. For this year, when Carroo plays we probably have the best WR. That's it, that's the entirety of our advantages. Disadvantages? All the other WR, the OL, the DL, the DB, the QB and for pro set teams the TE and the FB.
I don't follow recruiting much at all so could be completely wrong but didn't Rettig play in spread type offense in high school?It's a rebuild for several reasons.
Best skill player? Gone
Best OL? Gone
Kickers? As bad as they've been, gone.
DL? Might be gone/might be back. Some depth has emerged, but nothing that gets you excited against OSU, MSU, Mich or PSU.
LBs? Does Longa come back? If not, that group is thin as anything.
DBs-There is B10 talent there, which is ironic considering the pre-season
RBs-B10 talent
TE-color me unimpressed
QB-Lavs is a debacle. Retting would be a first year starter. I think Dare gets swallowed up in the depth chart and eventually transfers. You have faith in true frosh Russo beating any of the big 4 in our division?
Now, here is the biggest issue. Rumors abound that the search will focus on a coach with a spread offensive system. IF...and I'm stressing IF...that materializes, our QBs are all wrong and will be behind a line that hasn't blocked that way since HS (if at all).
Installing the spread isn't Organic Chemistry, but you can expect 1-2 years of a steep learning curve and mismatched personnel until the new guy recruits an OL and QB to run the system.
It's a rebuild...it might not be a total tear down, but it's a rebuild.
Don't know, but I thought the reason he left LSU was the new OC or HC changed to the spread.I don't follow recruiting much at all so could be completely wrong but didn't Rettig play in spread type offense in high school?
Now, here is the biggest issue. Rumors abound that the search will focus on a coach with a spread offensive system. IF...and I'm stressing IF...that materializes, our QBs are all wrong and will be behind a line that hasn't blocked that way since HS (if at all).
Installing the spread isn't Organic Chemistry, but you can expect 1-2 years of a steep learning curve and mismatched personnel until the new guy recruits an OL and QB to run the system.
I agree with that. I don't know how long the transition will be but I think there will be one.My point is simple.
Flood's recruiting has not be up to B10 levels. I think that is not up for debate, no?
That, coupled with a new offensive system, would suggest that the new guy is going to struggle for at least 2 seasons. I'm not saying the shelves are totally bare. But we're at a distinct talent disadvantage in our division. That, more than anything, suggests to me that we should view the job as a rebuild and give the new staff a fair bit of slack in terms of results on the field.
My point is simple.
Flood's recruiting has not be up to B10 levels. I think that is not up for debate, no?
That, coupled with a new offensive system, would suggest that the new guy is going to struggle for at least 2 seasons. I'm not saying the shelves are totally bare. But we're at a distinct talent disadvantage in our division. That, more than anything, suggests to me that we should view the job as a rebuild and give the new staff a fair bit of slack in terms of results on the field.
The shelves may not be totally bare, but we're down to ramen noodles or cat food. When you don't have top half of the conference have talent at WR, OL or QB you're in trouble. Our LBs could be criminally thin without Longa, the DL is adequate at best and the DBs will still be young and thin.
In fact, other than RB, we won't have top half of the conference talent at a single position, but we might have bottom 2 or 3 talent at 3 or 4 positions. The cupboards are looking pretty damn bare to me. Basically we have good RBs.
Here's what would be telling. Many say Julie was nowhere to be seen during the Nebraska game. Did she do her usual, hug Flood when he gets off the bus? If she does not hug Flood when he gets off the bus for the Maryland game, I would say he's toast.
It's a rebuild for several reasons.
Best skill player? Gone
Best OL? Gone
Kickers? As bad as they've been, gone.
DL? Might be gone/might be back. Some depth has emerged, but nothing that gets you excited against OSU, MSU, Mich or PSU.
LBs? Does Longa come back? If not, that group is thin as anything.
DBs-There is B10 talent there, which is ironic considering the pre-season
RBs-B10 talent
TE-color me unimpressed
QB-Lavs is a debacle. Retting would be a first year starter. I think Dare gets swallowed up in the depth chart and eventually transfers. You have faith in true frosh Russo beating any of the big 4 in our division?
Now, here is the biggest issue. Rumors abound that the search will focus on a coach with a spread offensive system. IF...and I'm stressing IF...that materializes, our QBs are all wrong and will be behind a line that hasn't blocked that way since HS (if at all).
Installing the spread isn't Organic Chemistry, but you can expect 1-2 years of a steep learning curve and mismatched personnel until the new guy recruits an OL and QB to run the system.
It's a rebuild...it might not be a total tear down, but it's a rebuild.
Vince Lombardi could come in here with Bill Walsh as his OC and Hoodie as his DC and he isn't beating OSU, Mich or MSU in the next 3-4 seasons. This is a total rebuild as this point.
That can't be the metric for evaluating a potential candidate.
Vince Lombardi could come in here with Bill Walsh as his OC and Hoodie as his DC and he isn't beating OSU, Mich or MSU in the next 3-4 seasons. This is a total rebuild as this point.
That can't be the metric for evaluating a potential candidate.
Butch Davis is not exactly suited for RU. He's of the Jimmy Johnson "school of yahoo," which really wouldn't play well in the NJ market, for HS recruiting and for the alumni and fan base.
He can coach. Sure. But . . . in 2011, Davis was fired by UNC, per an NCAA investigation of academic misconduct (cheating) and allegations of players receiving improper benefits (cash and gifts) from agents; Davis assistant and long-time friend, John Blake, had direct financial ties to an agent.
And then there's this: Davis infamously told his players in a team meeting, "If ya'll came here for an education, you should have gone to Harvard." Untouchable, to the RU admin. Just not possible.
Don't know, but I thought the reason he left LSU was the new OC or HC changed to the spread.
It's a rebuild for several reasons.
Best skill player? Gone
Best OL? Gone
Kickers? As bad as they've been, gone.
DL? Might be gone/might be back. Some depth has emerged, but nothing that gets you excited against OSU, MSU, Mich or PSU.
LBs? Does Longa come back? If not, that group is thin as anything.
DBs-There is B10 talent there, which is ironic considering the pre-season
RBs-B10 talent
TE-color me unimpressed
QB-Lavs is a debacle. Retting would be a first year starter. I think Dare gets swallowed up in the depth chart and eventually transfers. You have faith in true frosh Russo beating any of the big 4 in our division?
Now, here is the biggest issue. Rumors abound that the search will focus on a coach with a spread offensive system. IF...and I'm stressing IF...that materializes, our QBs are all wrong and will be behind a line that hasn't blocked that way since HS (if at all).
Installing the spread isn't Organic Chemistry, but you can expect 1-2 years of a steep learning curve and mismatched personnel until the new guy recruits an OL and QB to run the system.
It's a rebuild...it might not be a total tear down, but it's a rebuild.