ADVERTISEMENT

Football Max Melton & Chris Long Suspended

maybe

But I have no doubt whatsoever that a few of the posters who are downplaying this would be singing an entirely different tune if this was a case of two 19 year olds from New Brunswick sitting in a car on College Ave firing paintballs at students.
Or, how would the people who keep downplaying the severity were the ones who were hit. Being hit by a paintball is not fun. I know. Hurts like hell.
 
If the victims were friends of the assailants, then 3 game suspension. If they didn't know them, a full year.

I'll set the over/under at a 5 game suspension.
I'm going to venture a guess that the entire thing will get dropped with some form of a slap on the wrist, possibly even just public service. Although it might take awhile before that happens and it's hard to say what the team will do in the meantime.
 
My opinion, based on what I believe and not backed up by any law-book :
That makes it look bad, but let;s see if the victims want to press charges or if the prosecute plays hardball when it comes to reducing the charges.
Sometimes after something happens, the worst is looked at as going to be the result.
Then after everything starts cooling down, the victims and DA decide leniency might be in order because the intent to harm wasn't there when the idiots acted recklessly.

The amount of blood and bruising will be a factor, if just from a scratch like injury might help the accused be treated like pranksters instead of criminals.

The sky is falling look happening now might just turn into a rain situation that just muddied up Chris and Max's eligibility for the Wolverine game, but is settled favorably enough to get them playing the next game against Ohio State
.
I would be shocked beyond belief if they are playing before the matter is adjudicated, which I cannot see happening anytime soon.
 
Most likely not until the season is over. They will be arraigned, retain counsel, get discovery and have either a court date or pre trial conference. Most likely this goes into the new year. I am making the assumption this goes to municipal; I don't believe it stays in State Court.
Might also be plea bargained down to a lesser charge and be sentenced on, quickly , if the prosecutor feels the charge doesn't really fit the crime and the victims don't object.
 
I would be shocked beyond belief if they are playing before the matter is adjudicated, which I cannot see happening anytime soon.
you could be right, but I feel once Chris and Max get lawyewrs , those lawyers will be working to get this resolved quickly and asking for the charges to be knocked down to a lesser offense for a guilty plea and have the sentence handed down quickly to have the player miss as little playing time as possible .
Letting Schiano decide how long time missed rather that time missed because of the accused having to wait for the case to go through the legal system
 
Last edited:
from an article by Kratch. Seems there were actual injuries AND the vehicle was moving

"One victim was hit in the right elbow at close range, according to probable cause affidavits obtained by NJ Advance Media. Another victim was hit in the left arm and lower back and the third was hit in the lower abdomen, all at close range. The first and third victims suffered bleeding as a result of the incident, according to the affidavits, while the second victim had bruising and welts.

The players were in a moving vehicle when they shot the victims, according to the affidavits".
The fact that it was close range changes my opinion of one or two games. I was thinking little chance for harm. Close range makes this more serious imo. Really amazing how dumb young people (anyone really) can be.
 
Holy exaggeration there Batman. Have to play the racism card when there was none in this incident? Lucky that they weren't killed by the police? What world do you live in?
I mean... we have absolutely no idea if there was racism involved here or not. The person to whom you're responding didn't claim there was any racism, he just said they were lucky they didn't experience any. You are actually claiming, with no possible way to prove it, that there wasn't any racism.

He's guilty of leveraging a populist mindset about police and racism. You're guilty of leaping to a conclusion without any factual evidence.

I'm guilty of failing completely to understand why people are so damned insistent upon staking out rigid ideological positions about a situation in which we haven't even seen an indictment, let alone a conviction.
 
Last edited:
Given the fact that COVID protocols are still in place, and grand jury proceedings are not easily obtained, and given that thankfully no one was seriously hurt, and that the incident can easily be explained as a prank gone wrong, I think it is more likely than not that the charges will be remanded to Piscataway Municipal Court for disposition as disorderly persons offenses, where a fine and community service will be meted out, and many mea culpas will be uttered by Chris and Max. Under that scenario, I think the suspensions could be lifted. Hopefully, the prosecutor will expedite the review and hopefully remand the case so that it can be resolved well before 11/4.
That's more or less what I think as well. But we'll see.
 
Just thought they were lucky the other kids weren’t packing heat
Or lucky some cops weren't witnessing what happened, saw what looked like a drive-by shooting, and opened fire on the occupants of the car.

People are calling it a prank and maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. We just haven't seen nearly enough evidence to form a valid conclusion about the intent behind this.

But one thing we know is that, whomever actually did the paintball gun shooting from the car, it was a very stupid, situationally unaware thing to do that clearly risked some serious consequences for the people involved. Even if they wind up getting off with a slap in the wrist, which is my guess here, the "reward" from the prank couldn't possibly have justified the risks (legal or otherwise) involved. Just very, very dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUChoppin
I would be shocked beyond belief if they are playing before the matter is adjudicated, which I cannot see happening anytime soon.
I don't know the specifics of the charges or what's alleged in the complaint, but if no one was seriously injured and the paint gun was not used as an instrument in another felony such as robbery, its hard for me to see how it does not get remanded back down to municipal court. If I am defending them just on what I have seen here, and assuming these kids have no priors, I am going to ask the court that they should be candidates for PTI.
 
OK a couple of things about that. NJ is ridiculous in it's hatred for guns. So much so that airsoft and paintball guns - neither of which are deadly weapons - are called weapons. It's the height of stupidity. That said the law needs to be followed and these two screwed up - even though that law is unjust and silly when applied to toys that aren't weapons.

They might be done for the year just due to the anti-gun hysteria of NJ.

Sucks. Max was looking to have a great future here.

Right. They aren't deadly weapons but they ARE weapons. What you call hysteria normal people call common sense.

If I shot you in the eye with a paintgun, should I face arrest? Or should it just be seen as playing with a toy, and your losing an eye was just "bad luck"?

Sean-Leydon.jpg
 
I would never point my guns at someone unless I intend to shoot. And as a matter of common sense I'd never put myself in a position where I'd accidentally point at someone. So it's a moot point.
Exactly. This is one of the cardinal rules of gun safety. Only point your gun at intended targets when you are ready to fire.
Idiots. Is it considered fun to do a paintball drive-by? Because that sounds pretty dumb.
Yes, idiots. Kinda like the guy driving by and slapping girls asses.
It looks like intent to harm was present. Shooting from a moving vehicle. They're done!
Aim. Shoot. Inflict damage = dummies
Middle school stupidity . They should sit 2-3 games imo
Middle school stupidity carried out by adults = felony.
C'mon, that's ridiculous. It's just a prank.

I would rather be attacked in a Max Melton paintball driveby incident than run into a drunk driver.
Based in the law. I'd rather be caught drunk driving than aiming and shooting a weapon at someone. Much harsher consequences with felony assault.
Do you people live under a rock? In what world is driving around campus with a Gun shooting people not as bad as it seems?

first of all, they’re shooting they’re fellow classmates and fans that are supposed to pack the stadium and support the team. Sounds like shooting people is the right idea. That will certainly pack sellout crowds.

secondly,
Do you realize the time of society we live in? Two black males seen shooting a gun on a college campus. They are both lucky they weren’t caught in the act and gunned down by police. Is that not ****ing idiotic to you?

amazing to me how ****ing tone deaf you old ass morons are
I think thsee are valid viewpoints. Shooting at your fans and classmates is a bad look. Some have been harsh on you for the race thing, but in all actuality, those very events have played out recently with bad results.
This is complete nonsense . No one was hurt. This was the stupid RUPD campus police . They should have taken Melton and Long into custody , made them sweat a little bit and called schiano to come pick them up . Release them with some disorderly persons offense and everyone goes on their merry way. It’s going to amount to that anyway .

This is a complete waste of taxpayer dollars, probably by a few rogue campus cops . The arresting officers should get shut out of any overtime opportunities that may be available via rutgers sporting events.
What?!?!? RUPD would look the fools if they allowed an indictable, felony offense to go by the wayside and it was discovered they gave preferable treatment to football players....and it was uncovered. They did the right thing. Responded to an assault on campus and charged the individuals. Period. Let the lawyers and court duke it out, and get the charges reduced for this prank. I agree it is a waste of tax payer money, but it is also a waste of tax payer/university money to give scholarships to people who are willing to commit felony crimes, isn't it?
 
I am still trying to figure out how the fellow described earlier in the thread drove up and down College Ave pinching young women. If he was driving, as described, did he constantly veer to the wrong side of the road to get in his kicks? If it's poorly worded, and he got up to his shenanigans on the passenger side, how was he so deft that he could pull this off without knocking someone over? That's to say nothing of the fact that these young women would alert someone, even back in ye olden times.

I smell a steaming pile of b.s. on that story.
 
Well that much is a given regardless.

The point is that if it was prank on their friends who they happened to know would be passing by for some reason, declining the care would clearly make sense.

Yes, it’s certainly also possible that none of the 3 random victims were shaken up enough after being “attacked out of nowhere” to want to take the time to go through the process of getting checked out at a medical facility”. My opinion is that the former scenario is more likely. You obviously disagree.
I disagree as yours makes zero sense at all. It's just an attempt by you to make an excuse for their behavior and to downgrade the assault into a "prank".
So they were just driving by. See friends and just happen to have paint ball guns at the ready in less time then it takes to drive by them in a car?? Please!! And it was 10pm so it was dark out too.
 
I mean... we have absolutely no idea if there was racism involved here or not. The person to whom you're responding didn't claim there was any racism, he just said they were lucky they didn't experience any. You are actually claiming, with no possible way to prove it, that there wasn't any racism.

He's guilty of leveraging a populist mindset about police and racism. You're guilty of leaping to a conclusion without any factual evidence.

I'm guilty of failing completely to understand why people are so damned insistent upon staking out rigid ideological positions about a situation in which haven't even seen an indictment, let alone a conviction.
Come on Mildy. Saying they were lucky not to have been shot and killed by the police is far more extreme than saying they were lucky that they didn't experience any racism. You are bright enough to understand so are being purposely opaque.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AreYouNUTS
Exactly. This is one of the cardinal rules of gun safety. Only point your gun at intended targets when you are ready to fire.

Yes, idiots. Kinda like the guy driving by and slapping girls asses.

Aim. Shoot. Inflict damage = dummies

Middle school stupidity carried out by adults = felony.

Based in the law. I'd rather be caught drunk driving than aiming and shooting a weapon at someone. Much harsher consequences with felony assault.

I think thsee are valid viewpoints. Shooting at your fans and classmates is a bad look. Some have been harsh on you for the race thing, but in all actuality, those very events have played out recently with bad results.

What?!?!? RUPD would look the fools if they allowed an indictable, felony offense to go by the wayside and it was discovered they gave preferable treatment to football players....and it was uncovered. They did the right thing. Responded to an assault on campus and charged the individuals. Period. Let the lawyers and court duke it out, and get the charges reduced for this prank. I agree it is a waste of tax payer money, but it is also a waste of tax payer/university money to give scholarships to people who are willing to commit felony crimes, isn't it?
I don't agree with all of your points. A paintball gun is not a gun. IMO drunk driving is a much more serious offense. Not talking the law. Just talking common sense. If they were shooting strangers, it shows a real lack of moral compass (that is just a D#CK move) and wild lack of judgement. And since an errant shot can cause serious harm such as loss of an eye, there should be meaningful consequences. But not jail time. Possibly dismissal from the team, but probably not if they are remorseful and were good citizens otherwise. If they shot at friends as a prank, then the penalty should be even less.

RUPD needs to enforce the law. End of story. Agree 100% there.
 
I am still trying to figure out how the fellow described earlier in the thread drove up and down College Ave pinching young women. If he was driving, as described, did he constantly veer to the wrong side of the road to get in his kicks? If it's poorly worded, and he got up to his shenanigans on the passenger side, how was he so deft that he could pull this off without knocking someone over? That's to say nothing of the fact that these young women would alert someone, even back in ye olden times.

I smell a steaming pile of b.s. on that story.
Could've been only on one way streets. Or he was driving a car built to British spec.

Or yeah, it could've been a steaming pile of BS. 😄
 
The fact that it was close range changes my opinion of one or two games. I was thinking little chance for harm. Close range makes this more serious imo. Really amazing how dumb young people (anyone really) can be.
This isn’t going away. These guys will be tied up in the courts for probably 6 months to a year. The unlawful possession of a weapon charge alone is a 4th degree with a presumption of up to 18 months in jail.
 
Last edited:
Can bac start a new RU vs Michigan prediction thread for Saturdays game?

Id like to change my prediction. 😀

This sounds like a gangsta assault by our players. Let’s call it what it is.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: newell138
Come on Mildy. Saying they were lucky not to have been shot and killed by the police is far more extreme than saying they were lucky that they didn't experience any racism. You are bright enough to understand so are being purposely opaque.
I merely repeated what he said using pretty much the same words he did. I didn't advocate for or against what he said.

Meanwhile, you've sidestepped the fact that you've claimed to know racism wasn't involved. Which none of us here can possibly know. It is something we'll likely never be able to factually know.

I don't intend to chose sides in some ideological debate about the prevalence of racism and policing in this thread. That's a conversation better suited to the CE board.
 
gun control needs to tell the difference from guns and toys that shoot projectiles.
The one fits all charge is not the way to apply any type of gun law and makes a case to oppose gun control.

I'll wait to hear the facts in this incident before I say if what Max and Chris did was a criminal act or just overreaction by the police because they had to follow a unjust gun law that made stupid horseplay into a crime because a toy is by law considered a deadly weapon.

Edit, found out in a post I didn't see when posting this that it was a drive by paint ball shootings.
I'll now call this incident a stupid horseplay mistake made into a major crime because of a stupid law that doesn't take into account what should be considered a toy and what should be considered a deadly weapon.

Agree. But the attitude of the NJ government is to strike fear into the hearts of anyone who wants to exercise their 2A rights. There's a quote from part of the NJ judiciary that says something like "Folks in NJ exercise their 2A rights at their own risk." This is from the judges(!!) in NJ.

Hence, BB guns, wrist rockets, paintball felonies, etc...
 
THisfrom an article by Kratch. Seems there were actual injuries AND the vehicle was moving

"One victim was hit in the right elbow at close range, according to probable cause affidavits obtained by NJ Advance Media. Another victim was hit in the left arm and lower back and the third was hit in the lower abdomen, all at close range. The first and third victims suffered bleeding as a result of the incident, according to the affidavits, while the second victim had bruising and welts.

The players were in a moving vehicle when they shot the victims, according to the affidavits".
This does not sound good for reducing charges.
Claiming ignorance of not knowing someone could be seriously injured I don't think will fly here.
Bleeding sounds like a game changer for trying to get reducing charges.
 
The NJ Supreme Court in 2004 held that a paintball gun was a weapon, not a firearm, and upheld a guilty plea to unlawful possession of a weapon by a juvenile who shot a paintball pellet at an unoccupied car. The court held that the possession of a paintball gun under circumstances not manifestly appropriate for its use as a lawful weapon violated the statute, and that under that section of the statute, which is a fourth degree crime, the discharge of the gun is not necessary to violate the statute; thus as long as you possess a paintball gun outside of the space for which they are permitted, i.e. a paintball facility, you are guilty of this section. Thus, there is no need to prove any INTENT to use the gun unlawfully, only that it was possessed in a manner not appropriate for its lawful use. Very harsh statute.

All intended to create an environment of fear and control.
 
I disagree as yours makes zero sense at all. It's just an attempt by you to make an excuse for their behavior and to downgrade the assault into a "prank".
So they were just driving by. See friends and just happen to have paint ball guns at the ready in less time then it takes to drive by them in a car?? Please!! And it was 10pm so it was dark out too.
Look - every single poster has acknowledged this was an idiotic thing to do. At 10pm they should be in bed during season.

But the bottom line is nobody was badly hurt and neither you nor I have the background information on why they chose this location on this particular night to pull this crap. Maybe it was random or maybe they knew the victims would be there for some reason that we’ll find out later. It was an extremely stupid prank regardless but I for one hope we find out there’s still more to the story that will come out later confirming it was a just dumb prank with no malicious intentions.

At this point, the “injuries” described in the report thankfully sound on par with the typical collateral damage one endures when voluntarily engaging in a paint ball game for recreational purposes (there’s bruising involved and sometimes some bleeding if you break skin, etc).
 
UPDATE:



Kenneth Cop, Rutgers University Police Department Chief, released the following statement:

"On Monday, September 20, 2021, at approximately 10:00 PM, the Rutgers University Police Department (RUPD) responded to the area of Livingston Campus in the Township of Piscataway for the report of three student victims that were struck with paintballs discharged from a motor vehicle. The three victims sustained minor injuries and declined further medical attention on scene. An investigation completed by the RUPD resulted in the arrest of two male suspects on September 21, 2021.

Malachi M. Melton, a 19-year-old resident of Toms River, NJ, and Christopher M. Long, a 19-year-old resident of Willingboro, NJ, have been charged with three counts of Aggravated Assault and Possession of a Weapon for an Unlawful Purpose. Both were released on their own recognizance with summonses to appear in Middlesex County Superior Court on November 4, 2021, at 8:45 AM."

So driving around being idiots. Guilty. Probation. Wash police cars every weekend for a month. Sit out first half of UM game. Run til you barf. Write letters of apology to just about the entire world.

No third chances.

See done. Now we can move on - I wish.
 
Last edited:
We don’t know for sure - but Schiano’s words give reason to at least hope that intent to harm wasn’t present. If this was the kind of thing where they had actually shot at someone and injured them, it would 1) likely be in the news already and 2) Schiano probably would’ve chosen different words than simply saying he heard they were taken into custody due to some incident with a paintball gun. This one feels like it’ll land in the silly prank family. Though in NJ, this particular offense is punishable by mandatory jail time so not sure what will happen next with it.

Sounds like the paintball version of driving around and hitting mailboxes with a bat. @herdof3
 
  • Like
Reactions: herdof3
The police report quoted by Tango Two says:

"The three victims sustained minor injuries and declined further medical attention on scene."

So three owies. Lucky they didn't take out an eye but no big deal other than what I laid out earlier. 1/2 game. etc...
 
This isn’t going away. These guys will be tied up in the courts for probably 6 months to a year. The unlawful possession of a weapon charge alone is a 4th degree with a presumption of up to 18 months in jail.
There is a presumption of NON INCARCERATION for third and fourth degree crimes for first time offenders; the exceptions to the presumption do not apply here. Having said that, if the county prosecutor wants to make headlines regarding this case it could be dragged out well beyond the season as you suggest.
 
based on the statement from the RU police dept., seems to me these two will miss more than one game, and they should. don't care what you are shooting out of a car, you're still shooting at people who most likely don't know it's a paintball gun.

to me this seems like more than a harmless college prank. it's not about whether the there was intent to harm....it's about the perspective of the victim (e.g. aiming an empty gun at someone is no less a crime than a loaded gun).

Believe me you'll know the difference between being shot at with a paintball gun and a real firearm. At no point did those three think they were shot at with a real gun.
 
Look - every single poster has acknowledged this was an idiotic thing to do. At 10pm they should be in bed during season.

But the bottom line is nobody was badly hurt and neither you nor I have the background information on why they chose this location on this particular night to pull this crap. Maybe it was random or maybe they knew the victims would be there for some reason that we’ll find out later. It was an extremely stupid prank regardless but I for one hope we find out there’s still more to the story that will come out later confirming it was a just dumb prank with no malicious intentions.

At this point, the “injuries” described in the report thankfully sound on par with the typical collateral damage one endures when voluntarily engaging in a paint ball game for recreational purposes (there’s bruising involved and sometimes some bleeding if you break skin, etc).
Again. You keep trying to down play this incident. I'm sure you wouldn’t if you child pulled this crap or was one of the kids that got hit. Obviously the kids that got hit called and talked to the police so your prank theory is full of crap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knightmoves
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT