ADVERTISEMENT

New 2016 Uniform Photo Gallery Wallpaper-Sized Image...

Hopefully they won't put Rutgers on the name plate - either put the kid's name or leave it blank...looks cheasy. But it may just be for display purposes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyRU
Don't like the white - red - white look there. Looks too much like Louisville, And the all-white is OK, but like with the red pants better. And finally, the white helmet is maybe a little plain and a red stripe or the sword stripe like the whites we've been wearing might make it a little better. Those though, are literally my only "suggestions" or whatever, not calling them complaints. Overall really like the look!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyRU
I like the uniforms and the secondary knight head logo too. But, I see the knight head on the hoops uniform, but I don't see the knight head anywhere on the football uniform. Is it there?
 
th
Anyone like?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJDOVES
I like the uniforms and the secondary knight head logo too. But, I see the knight head on the hoops uniform, but I don't see the knight head anywhere on the football uniform. Is it there?

people are thinking it might make a surprise appearance on alt. unis.
 
The numbers ain't cool. Look at the 14 with the little hook up top. What is that, part of New Jersey horseshoe? Maybe SMU or Sooners. Debatable digits.
 
Dirty -- Thanks for doing this. I didn't realize that the uniforms didn't say "Rutgers" anywhere on them (assuming the players' names, and not Rutgers, appear on the nameplate on the back). That is a change from the past, and certainly a cleaner look. I guess that shows that Rutgers has arrived, since our uniforms don't actually have to say Rutgers for people to know that it is Rutgers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyRU
A pleasant surprise from the pajamas look and some of the other bizarre combos we were seeing. The block R is known as Rutgers and I like the idea of just allowing it to say it all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyRU
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT