It would be tough to envision 6'4'' 260, if accurate, as an optimal playing weight for anyone. I'll see it with my own eyes in a few days.
Rashod Kent was listed 6'6" 265lbs. Anyone who stood near him knew that he was closer to 6'4 than 6'6". I have no idea what his actual weight was.It would be tough to envision 6'4'' 260, if accurate, as an optimal playing weight for anyone. I'll see it with my own eyes in a few days.
Beg to differ as an RC alum the kid is a baller and has never had any conditioning issue at all and has played at that weight I have seen him play many gamesBullock is out of shape. Like the most shockingly overweight player I can ever remember including centers and he is only 6-4. Anyone that went to the open practice could see that and certainly the coaching staff will be working him hard. Can't envision him having any role this year. Beyond this year, remains to be seen.
I loved Kent. He was so underrated. I remember him giving Troy Murphy fits and battling with Sweetney from GU.Glad to hear Rashod Kent was there - he is one of my all time favorites. Still remember when he mildly complained about fouling out on senior night.
Kent was a legitimate 6 foot 5 1/2 inches tall and had extraordinarily long arms.Rashod Kent was listed 6'6" 265lbs. Anyone who stood near him knew that he was closer to 6'4 than 6'6". I have no idea what his actual weight was.
It would be tough to envision 6'4'' 260, if accurate, as an optimal playing weight for anyone. I'll see it with my own eyes in a few days.
Unless I'm mistaken, don't think Omoruyi was at the open practice. Anyone know the deal? From the preseason reports sounded like he was a physical 6-6 guy. Was looking forward to seeing how he might fit in.
Hope you're right.Beg to differ as an RC alum the kid is a baller and has never had any conditioning issue at all and has played at that weight I have seen him play many games
To clarify I meant at Rutgers not in the history of basketball so Hot Plate Williams and company can rest easy. By "ever" I mean in the last 33 years since I've been attending RU games. But I stand by my statement. Believe what you want (as long it's always positive of course because everything else must be nonsense.) I saw him Saturday on the court not on some old you tube clip.
I'm pretty sure thar we see this big ten rotation by the time we are in the heart of league play
Sanders 30
Johnson 30
Freeman 26
Laurent 24
Tham 23
Sa 22
Williams 20
Getty 17
Doorson 8
FIG - he moves incredibly well for a kid who is carrying that weight around.
How would you know? You weren't there, dude. Give it a rest. I gave my observation for those that couldn't be there - you're welcome.And I'm sure he was not shockingly out of shape during the open practice.
How would you know? You weren't there, dude. Give it a rest. I gave my observation for those that couldn't be there - you're welcome.
I was at the practice. Bullock will definitely not log major minutes until he transforms his body. While being skinny or hefty does not necessarily dictate what type of shape you are in, there is a correlation. He is definitely not in optimal shape. For instance, he is able to dunk, but he struggles to do so. Why struggle when it will be easier if you shed a few pounds?Don't take it personal, but, if 10 people give an observation and only 1 guy says a player practiced and looked like he was way of shape I'll go with the other 9. No one else is saying he practiced like he was out of shape.....was he panting on the court, doubled over with his hands on his knees, laboring to get up and down the court or lagging behind in the drills?
LOL. LOL. I'm honestly not a Bullock shill, but c'mon! The guy has no trouble dunking at all. These boards are hilarious sometimes.I was at the practice. Bullock will definitely not log major minutes.....He is definitely not in optimal shape. For instance, he is able to dunk, but he struggles to do so. Why struggle when it will be easier if you shed a few pounds?
I mean, I watched him do it. He barely got to the rim. My point, which is not arguable, is that getting in better shape will be a good thing for him.LOL. LOL. I'm honestly not a Bullock shill, but c'mon! The guy has no trouble dunking at all. These boards are hilarious sometimes.
All good. Of course it's not arguable that getting in better shape helps. I was just keying on that the statement that he struggles to dunk. Multiple people on this board have seen the kid play, including myself. Trust me, dunking is not a problem. He's probably in the best shape he's been in years. You can probably YouTube his multiple highlight slams against St Patrick's at Kean last year, in crunch time, against a bigger front line than most colleges have. Don't know how many minutes he'll get this year, but no doubt, the kid is a baller.I mean, I watched him do it. He barely got to the rim. My point, which is not arguable, is that getting in better shape will be a good thing for him.
Absolutely, if anything you'd like him to solidify his frame, not lose it. Doesn't need to be at 2% body fat, but needs to turn some of it into muscle, which he will.All good. Of course it's not arguable that getting in better shape helps. I was just keying on that the statement that he struggles to dunk. Multiple people on this board have seen the kid play, including myself. Trust me, dunking is not a problem. He's probably in the best shape he's been in years. You can probably YouTube his multiple highlight slams against St Patrick's at Kean last year, in crunch time, against a bigger friends my line than most colleges have. Don't know how many minutes he'll get this year, but no doubt, the kid is a baller.