Stats without mentioning who the opponent was is one way to make someone's argument look really good....vs judging JMike against Seton Hall (not good this year) and Penn State, Texas A&M, Alabama or Notre Dame.
It doesn't mean that Simpson isn't improved from 1 year to the next, but we are seeing a better version of Simpson in JWill, learning how to function and be effective, when he is not on the ball most of the possessions, because we have JMike on a handful of possessions and obviously Dylan Harper, Ace Bailey or Jordan Derkack, who can playmake.
Simpson and JMike are essentially the same player and if I let JMike play against a declining Nova program or American (who Simpson played last night) I'm fairly certain JMike could have the same caliber of game.
I can only explain so many times, how difficult the jump is from the Ivy League to the B1G, or the Atlantic 10 to the B1G, unless you are a 1st team all conference caliber player. Arguing that Simpson is slightly better than JMike is fine, but he's still not JWill on a defensive end or playmaking end either.....and is nowhere near the defender that Derkack is.
I'm fairly certain Simpsons numbers and productivity against WAY better competition than Nova or American, would not be as stellar. To try and say otherwise is just false.....you only pick up a better FT shooter, and that's about it.