a question for those in the first group to be vaccinated: Is NJ doing antibody testing of your group for the purpose of moving those without antibodies to the front of the line ahead of those who do have antibodies?
Antibody testing is not being done.
Antibodies are not a consideration for vaccination. First, it takes time to do that and second the antibody tests are not always accurate, and third, it's clear that the immune response raised by vaccination is usually superior to that from being infected/recovered, so everyone who can get a vaccine should.
Antibodies may not be a consideration, but prior, recent CV-19 infection is a consideration. While immune response may be greater from vaccination, those with acquired CV-19 antibodies have protection. They can get their vaccination later. Those with zero antibodies are the ones who need it now IMO.
Viruses NEED hosts to live. If viruses kill their hosts easily, they have nowhere to live.
Hence viruses usually mutate to become less deadly...so they survive.
That is a good point, but take bacteria and antibiotics as an example. Over the years, treatments were effective against bacteria. However antibiotics were over used, strains of bacteria mutated/evolved and are now resistant to many of our old tried and true antibiotics. This has put the health care system in danger because there are very few treatments for some very deadly bacteria. Any virus could theorhetically be able to take this path and become more harmful to its host.
Another pre-print pointing to long lasting immunity.
They should encourage people who were already infected to get in the back of the line, especially those under 50.
SARS-CoV-2 infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells in humans
Infection or vaccination induces a population of long-lived bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) that are a persistent and essential source of protective antibodies1–5. Whether this population is induced in patients infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is un...www.researchsquare.com
Agreed. Back of the line. CV-19 infected persons have antibodies which should provide adequate immunity. No reason to take the vaccine and leave those with no protection out on the porch until something is available for them. Some don't see it this way, but do we want many people with adequate protection? Or some with more than enough protection while others have zero until there is adequate availability for them?