I question the demand. I think the targets are too aggressive and will burn too much political capital causing politicians to eventually push the dates out. But gas prices or something with temperatures and/or storms that creates a much stronger sense of urgency could occur that would alter my thinking about that.Are you questioning it due to demand or supply or both?
then why set them and create a political divide rather than actually working on creating an infrastructureThese are targets. If they are not hit it’s not like we’re all going to turn into pumpkins.
What political divide? We took full advantage of generous government incentives two purchase a full EV and a plug in hybrid and to do solar at home. Politics has nothing to do with this, except for people who seem to make everything political.then why set them and create a political divide rather than actually working on creating an infrastructure
lol naivety at it's finestWhat political divide? We took full advantage of generous government incentives two purchase a full EV and a plug in hybrid and to do solar at home. Politics has nothing to do with this, except for people who seem to make everything political.
exactlythen why set them and create a political divide rather than actually working on creating an infrastructure
I think there may be some concern about building a bridge to no where.I question the demand. I think the targets are too aggressive and will burn too much political capital causing politicians to eventually push the dates out. But gas prices or something with temperatures and/or storms that creates a much stronger sense of urgency could occur that would alter my thinking about that.
Been saying this all along. First get the infrastructure in place. Then push the cars. Otherwise, it's gonna be political suicide in many places. I understand the aggressive targets, as a means of pushing the transition. But just can't see many places keeping to the original target dates.
If politicians were serious about this, they'd be willing to spend more on building out public charging infrastructure than they are, at the moment.
There are plenty of examples of that. Some are over reaching and some are there to protecting stupid people from themselves.both....but the biggest issue i have is setting some ridiculous mandate that is clearly not driven by the public but driven by some nutjob poltical statement
spoken like an elitist concerned only for himselfWhat political divide? We took full advantage of generous government incentives two purchase a full EV and a plug in hybrid and to do solar at home. Politics has nothing to do with this, except for people who seem to make everything political.
Point went way over your head. Do you ever stop whining about anything and everything? Find things that make you happy.spoken like an elitist concerned only for himself
That makes sense. There's a bit of chicken or the egg to it.I think there may be some concern about building a bridge to no where.
Or at least there may have been. They probably need to get on that horse now though.
How is what he said elitist or selfish? I'm not seeing it.spoken like an elitist concerned only for himself
Given the jump in sales, I'm sure the charging stations will follow. May be some delay there, but I think it will be to the point of grumbling, not so much a real issue, because companies are going to step up.That makes sense. There's a bit of chicken or the egg to it.
But the mandates and Tesla's sales numbers convinced automakers to hop on board, and most have in a big way. So, instead of mandates, politicians would be better served, IMO, to focus on infrastructure spending in support of EVs.
People will continue to buy EVs anyway because, for most people, it's a compelling option from a purely technological standpoint. But building out the infrastructure can extend the choice to all the single-car owners with no access to at-home charging. And those are the people politicians have to worry about in upcoming elections.
At least that's how I see it. But then a number of things could change and make all this irrelevant. We'll obviously know a lot more in 5 years.
I think the mandates are mostly about helping automakers commit to the transition. And it worked.then why set them and create a political divide rather than actually working on creating an infrastructure
because he made a snide remark to me based on his ability to afford EVs which the majority of the population does not and does not have access to charging stationsHow is what he said elitist or selfish? I'm not seeing it.
Pretty sure he didn't mean it that way. He's just saying that despite the fact that he leans right politically, he's still embracing so-called "green" technologies he thinks make sense and doesn't care that political people view those things as being more appealing to the left.because he made a snide remark to me based on his ability to afford EVs which the majority of the population does not and does not have access to charging stations
Why set targets? Have you ever strategically planned anything in your life? lolthen why set them and create a political divide rather than actually working on creating an infrastructure
That's now, in a post-pandemic, post-inflation world. Governments have been taking steps to halt inflation and that will be having an impact on car buyers of all kinds.In a recent Cox Automotive survey, more than 50% of shoppers were interested in adding an EV to their stable. Being interested is easy, of course, but far fewer people actually buy. And in the same survey, 53% of consumers agreed that EVs will eventually replace traditional ICE-powered vehicles. Dealers were more cautious, with only 31% agreeing on an all-EV future. Dealers have a front-row seat to the many challenges ahead. And many dealers, recently, have been watching EV inventory building.
Again, this response makes no sense.lol naivety at it's finest
Imagine being this butthurt over a type of car. Weirdo energy.Until you can charge and EV as fast as you can fill it up,
until you can get the range of a gas motor across all temps
until you can limit the EV impact that occurs due to mining etc
until you can have cheap ev like gas powered
nope! and let's be real, actual ev sales suck
I agree with the first sentence. But I think EVs and ICEVs will likely coexist forever. I just EVs are most likely to eventually reach and settle around high 80s to mid 90s in market-share. Although it'll take a lot longer than these mandates suggest.Imagine being this butthurt over a type of car. Weirdo energy.
EV’s will replace ICE and there is nothing you can do about it.
All of the above. Infrastructure too. How does that work in the urban areas?Are you questioning it due to demand or supply or both?
Better yet just let the market determine where we go and let people decide for themselves It’s a folly at this point for many reasonsI question the demand. I think the targets are too aggressive and will burn too much political capital causing politicians to eventually push the dates out. But gas prices or something with temperatures and/or storms that creates a much stronger sense of urgency could occur that would alter my thinking about that.
Been saying this all along. First get the infrastructure in place. Then push the cars. Otherwise, it's gonna be political suicide in many places. I understand the aggressive targets, as a means of pushing the transition. But just can't see many places keeping to the original target dates.
If politicians were serious about this, they'd be willing to spend more on building out public charging infrastructure than they are, at the moment.
Do you even know what snide means? There was nothing snide in my remark. I merely pointed out that our buying decisions had nothing to do with politics.because he made a snide remark to me based on his ability to afford EVs which the majority of the population does not and does not have access to charging stations
Pretty sure he didn't mean it that way. He's just saying that despite the fact that he leans right politically, he's still embracing so-called "green" technologies he thinks make sense and doesn't care that political people view those things as being more appealing to the left.
It's his way of saying not everything is political - not him saying "look what I can have and you can't".
These days, just about anybody can afford an EV as there are some pretty inexpensive good ones out there. And the total cost of ownership can be less than that of ICEVs. Which makes it even more financially sensible, in general.
That's now, in a post-pandemic, post-inflation world. Governments have been taking steps to halt inflation and that will be having an impact on car buyers of all kinds.
But over time, more and more people will buy EVs and, eventually, they will be less expensive to buy than ICE cars, and far less expensive to drive. They will be much more compelling than ICEVs for the typical consumer.
At that point, the elitists will be the folks who continue to own and operate ICE vehicles for nostalgic purposes, despite the high costs. Being a gearhead, I'm likely to own a couple ICE sports cars until I no longer can drive them, even though I fully expect it to be a frivolous expense. OTOH, my next SUV is almost certainly going to be hybrid or pure EV.
And, like with all things I do except voting, politics won't be a factor in any of those decisions.
yeah, he doesn't get that the FED isn't the Federal Gov't and that the Federal Gov't continues to increase inflationary pressureGovernments have been taking steps to fight inflation
Bahaha
yeah, he doesn't get that the FED isn't the Federal Gov't and that the Federal Gov't continues to increase inflationary pressure
don't expect too much though, they think EV is the cure all for faux global man made warming
solar activity, what's that
1k year warming cylce, whats' that
progressive earth warming cycle, what's that
let's bilk the taxpayer for EV and reduce our competive advantage and blow up our budgets too boot
morons all of them
We don't know if Autopilot was at fault or not, or how the case will shake out. But I'm a big fan of pushing back against a bunch of the automated driving technology across the industry. I don't want to see R&D on it halted. I do want to see more regulation and less willy-nilly trust the automotive companies to get it right, and less beta-testing or AI training on roadways.![]()
Judge finds evidence that Tesla, Musk knew about Autopilot defect
A Florida judge found "reasonable evidence" that Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk and other managers knew the automaker's vehicles had a defective Autopilot system but still allowed the cars to be driven unsafely, according to a ruling.www.reuters.com
If EV inventories continue to build, and I think they will based on reports, that will eventually lead to price cuts, which will then lead to a surge in sales.In a recent Cox Automotive survey, more than 50% of shoppers were interested in adding an EV to their stable. Being interested is easy, of course, but far fewer people actually buy. And in the same survey, 53% of consumers agreed that EVs will eventually replace traditional ICE-powered vehicles. Dealers were more cautious, with only 31% agreeing on an all-EV future. Dealers have a front-row seat to the many challenges ahead. And many dealers, recently, have been watching EV inventory building.
Tesla didn’t screw up showroom models….yeah! Winning!!!!!
![]()
Tesla silences critics with Cybertruck's immaculate build quality and perfect panel gaps, delivers it to more showrooms before Black Friday - Tesla Oracle
Tesla silences its critics with Cybertruck's build quality, immaculate fit and finish, and perfect panel gaps. Tesla puts it on display at more showrooms in California.www.teslaoracle.com
I don’t think so. I think most are holding off production ramp than cutting prices.If EV inventories continue to build, and I think they will based on reports, that will eventually lead to price cuts, which will then lead to a surge in sales.
It might pinch the car companies, but will be good for consumers.
Though I did talk a guy who is 6 months in to waiting for his EV Silverado. Think the inventory buildup will be more in sedan's then trucks and SUV's.