...told him they said once it starts raining he can't go outside even with the dogs until the storm is completely over.
Does the state pay for transportation for people who do not have vehicles?Lots of mandatory evacuations now in South FL. The problem is where to go - most of the state is under some type of warning.
Normally they provide buses.Does the state pay for transportation for people who do not have vehicles?
Just saw some gov't official who said "this storm will kill you"
Jacksonville Mayor much more reasonable "No need to panic, don't be afraid, just be prepared". And then stressed evacuation.
While the first guy is, imo, a fear monger, I do wonder if some people need that level of hyperbole in order to get the message.
Why is this storm not as bad as the one's you listed?
Looks like it will hit Florida as a Cat4.
I do wonder about the reports of storm surge when the shots from Nassau, where they predicted 10-15 foot surge, still show plenty of beach.
Which is fine, a pretty fair statement. A little different then "this storm will kill you".Christie said the same thing about Sandy. He basically told the Jersey Shore that if you decide to stay, you're on your own. Don't expect us to help you out.
At the end of the day, it's ALWAYS better to be safe than sorry. Always.The level of fear - and fearmongering - in our society continues to reach new heights. CNN's web site has a huge, bold headline at the top of the page reading GET OUT NOW.
Really? What is it about "now" that's left us unable to deal with things that used to be fairly run-of-the-mill? This isn't Camille, it's not Katrina, it's not even Andrew.
And for the record, the quote came from Florida governor Rick Scott.
Just asking a question killer.:smiley:If you think this storm is on a par with Camille and Katrina then you don't know much about storms.
If it hits FL as a Cat 4 it will be a marginal Cat 4. Camille was a huge 5. It had a central pressure of 900mb at landfall and sustained winds of 175 mph. It was huge. It impacted the coast perpendicularly - which matters a great deal. Storm surge on the Mississippi coast was 24 feet. It wiped out everything for nearly a mile inland.
As for Katrina... Nothing need be said:
![]()
Christie said the same thing about Sandy. He basically told the Jersey Shore that if you decide to stay, you're on your own. Don't expect us to help you out.
And if he told people to evacuate, and then it went north, people would freak about that.He said that one day after telling everyone to stock up on food and supplies because we could be stranded in our homes.
His message was not so solid during those 48 hours imo.
Just asking a question killer.:smiley:
Really don't know Camille at all, remember Anderw vaguely, Katrina I thought was a Cat3(?) but huge with a really deep low pressure, and thus huge storm surge which when travelling over land that is at, near, or even below sea level was what really made that one so bad.
And for what it's worth, this thing being a "marginal" cat 4? Sandy wasn't even hurricane force. So I don't see that as a reasonable down play.
And even if this isn't one of those all time destructive storms, is this one not that much of a concern?
Just wondering why you think this thing is not that bad.
Which is fine, a pretty fair statement. A little different then "this storm will kill you".
Well yeah this is what I'm getting at. With those 2 storms it was more storm surge then wind.Sandy's impact wasn't wind, either. Hell, it wasn't even rain. It was water, as you'll recall. It was a thousand miles of fetch, right up onto the NJ coast, driving a storm surge between 8 (Atlantic County) and 18 feet (western Raritan Bay).
Katrina was a Cat 5, with a MCP of 902mb and sustained winds of 175 mph, at its strongest. It was Cat 3 at landfall, but by that time was also the largest hurricane on record (as seen in the picture) and the storm surge was significant.
Well yeah this is what I'm getting at. With those 2 storms it was more storm surge then wind.
I've seen 6-9' for Surge predicted for a large stretch of coast line. In addition to 10+ inches of rain(something that Sandy did not deliver at least where I'm at).
Do you not expect a storm surge here? Or is the terrain just much different? (I do assume this plays into it significantly).
And while Mathew may not be as large as Katrina, if it grates the coast as predicted could it not have as wide spread an effect?
Should be noted that Matthew was also a cat 5 at one point.
Holy Mackeral, Camille had a 24' storm surge!!
Gov Scott.
"we are going to have a storm surge of, think about this 5-9 feet, not inches, feet!!!!!"
dude why even mention a storm surge of 5 inches?
The Cat 4 winds only extend about 10 miles from the eye and full hurricane winds 40 miles from center. Catastrophic impact will be very localized if anything. Most of the FL coast will get Tropical storm winds but not as bad as their reporting. Still enough to knock out power and make life miserable for a lot of people.
Well this is actually alot worse than landfall ing. This hurricane is up to 140 and scraping right up against the coastline for hundreds of miles. There will be a boatload of devistation up and down. This will be one of the costliest storms to ever hit the US if not the costliest let alone it's going to come back and probably wack em agan same time next week. This is not commonplaceThe level of fear - and fearmongering - in our society continues to reach new heights. CNN's web site has a huge, bold headline at the top of the page reading GET OUT NOW.
Really? What is it about "now" that's left us unable to deal with things that used to be fairly run-of-the-mill? This isn't Camille, it's not Katrina, it's not even Andrew.
And for the record, the quote came from Florida governor Rick Scott.
Assuming (just for the sake of the discussion) that the projected path verifies, then the wind component acting on the entire FL coast will be out of the east. The velocities will be lower than storm maximum, by maybe 10% and the lack of fetch will help keep the surge down, somewhat.
A 6-9' surge really isn't a whole hell of a lot. There will be some flooding, for sure, but it won't be on a par with the really major storms.
If you think back to, say, Andrew - most of the damage to southern FL from that storm was wind damage. There wasn't a lot of flood damage at all, and Andrew was a bigger storm.
Right now NHC is projecting the bulk of the storm surge from Matthew to impact Merritt Island. Fortunately, there's not a whole lot there compared to other parts of the Florida coast. There's a good inundation mapping tool here, on NHC's page.
The Cat 4 winds only extend about 10 miles from the eye and full hurricane winds 40 miles from center. Catastrophic impact will be very localized if anything. Most of the FL coast will get Tropical storm winds but not as bad as their reporting. Still enough to knock out power and make life miserable for a lot of people.
If there is doubt on what the wind will be ten miles in here is a probability.
Purple is bad.
![]()
The probability is referencing a floor or minimum for wind speed not a ceiling! Meaning at least that speed.To be clear, those are tropical storm force winds, i.e. 39+ mph.
The probability is referencing a floor or minimum not a ceiling!