ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Peyton Manning Sexual Assault

Picks it up? It was discussed in full detail years ago. To the point, he addressed it in a book
 
  • Like
Reactions: rurichdog
Before going any farther, it’s important to understand what the 74-page document is, and what it isn’t. The 74-page document is a piece of advocacy. The 74-page document is something that was written by the lawyers representing Jamie Ann Naughright in her defamation case against the Mannings. The 74-page document is, necessarily, one-sided.

The 74-page document is not objective. The 74-page document is not supposed to be objective. The 74-page document is not a court order or any other decision made by a neutral party. And, ultimately, the 74-page document is incomplete without comparing it to the corresponding “Facts of the Case” document submitted by the defendants in the case."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JoeRU0304
mikemarc1 said:
He addressed in the book he was "mooning" a teammate. This us much more than moonimg.
Click to expand...
Thought it was pretty well known she said he tea bagged her. He denied it, she wrote about it, he said she lied, she sued him he paid her off. What's the new news?
 
vkj91 said:
Thought it was pretty well known she said he tea bagged her. He denied it, she wrote about it, he said she lied, she sued him he paid her off. What's the new news?
Click to expand...

I'd say the scope of the cover up is new.
 
vkj91 said:
Thought it was pretty well known she said he tea bagged her. He denied it, she wrote about it, he said she lied, she sued him he paid her off. What's the new news?
Click to expand...

People pay people off all the time to make things go away - right or wrong - we do it all the time in my job (within reason). Not saying Peyton was innocent but rolling in the mud with this case to defend himself in a situation that probably couldn't be proven 1 way or the other just wasn't worth it from a PR perspective for him win or lose. Basically the longer it went on the worse it was going to be for him - guilty or innocent. The HGH allegations are another story though.
 
The writer appears to be a racist who doesn't like that Manning is a stand up guy and Newton showed himself to be what he is and is catching heat for it. His other articles are even more out there.

The person who green lights these hires are the real problem.
 
No way this could be agenda driven. I mean this only happened about 20 years ago and has been talked about. Oh that's right, Peyton just won a Super Bowl, so miserable a holes Ike that writer need to bring him down cause his life sucks
 
RUinPinehurst said:
Zap, you may want to delete your post. CYA, my friend. CYA.
Click to expand...
Thank you for your concern Pinehurst, I don't feel the need since I won't use details or implicant anyone else.
Everyone is aware of the decadence of the 70s and 80s… it was wild on the professional athlete level.
 
mikemarc1 said:
I'd say the scope of the cover up is new.
Click to expand...

Its always the cover up that does more damage. At some point Peyton should have said " I did something stupid that at the time, I, as an immature college student, thought was funny.". then write 2 checks, one to the victim for compensation and one to a charity that fights against stupid acts committed by star college athletes. But its the lies, denials and revenge against the victim that loses you all your endorsement deals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikemarc1, Abro1975 and zappaa
BigLou said:
Its always the cover up that does more damage. At some point Peyton should have said " I did something stupid that at the time, I, as an immature college student, thought was funny.". then write 2 checks, one to the victim for compensation and one to a charity that fights against stupid acts committed by star college athletes. But its the lies, denials and revenge against the victim that loses you all your endorsement deals.
Click to expand...
How true-
For the most part it always seems to be the lying and the coverup that gets you in the long run.
From first hand experience it's very difficult to see that in real time, only in retrospect does it become crystal clear.
 
biazza38 said:
No way this could be agenda driven. I mean this only happened about 20 years ago and has been talked about. Oh that's right, Peyton just won a Super Bowl, so miserable a holes Ike that writer need to bring him down cause his life sucks
Click to expand...
If Jameis Winston won the Super Bowl this same writer would write an article about how he was able to overcome the racist lies of his white Florida state accuser and how the black star qb almost had his great chance taken away. This guy is one of the originators of BLM, and would never make mention of cam stealing a computer or anything else. Not saying if the article is true or false but the source I would say sucks
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caliknight and biazza38
Tennessee and the SEC can do no wrong.
No fear of any repercussions
 
Which of the recent events discussed on this board do you consider the worst potrayal of an individual's character rank them 1-6 worst to least offensive from a character and personal standpoint(if true) I am interested in seeing these side by side

A. Bill Cosby accusations
B. Cam Newton not diving for a football
C. Peyton Manning getting free advertising plugs in
D. Princeton professor accusations
E. Peyton Manning assault and cover up accusations
F. Steve Politi and his journalism

My rank worst up A, E, D, F, B, C
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletJack and Abro1975
RUtix4me said:
Which of the recent events discussed on this board do you consider the worst potrayal of an individual's character rank them 1-6 worst to least offensive from a character and personal standpoint(if true) I am interested in seeing these side by side

A. Bill Cosby accusations
B. Cam Newton not diving for a football
C. Peyton Manning getting free advertising plugs in
D. Princeton professor accusations
E. Peyton Manning assault and cover up accusations
F. Steve Politi and his journalism

My rank worst up A, E, D, F, B, C
Click to expand...

A E D B C F
 
A few random things.
Shaun King (Wikipedia): "Jeffrey Shaun King (born 1979) is an American writer, entrepreneur, preacher and civil rights activist. He is noted for his use of social media to promote religious, charitable and social causes, including the Black Lives Matter movement." "King has written extensively about incidents in the Black Lives Matter movement, gaining prominence during the events following the shooting of Michael Brown. King wrote an article analyzing the Brown crime scene, and argued that the evidence suggested that officer Darren Wilson's life was not in danger during the shooting. " :rolleyes:

What's the story linked in the OP about?
"On the morning after Super Bowl 50, I posted a picture on my Facebook page of Cam Newton smiling and embracing Peyton Manning after the game and simply asked why that warm photo wasn't being talked about instead of Cam being frustrated at the post-game press conference. "

Most could have just stopped reading after looking at his bio and the quote to see where this was going. Call a Wahhhmbulance for Cam Newton, and while Shaun King is driving it, he can run over and drag Peyton Manning along.

Shaun King's piece is unfortunate--he doesn't like how a few folks (Bill Romanowski, Glen Beck, and some in the press) mistreated Cam Newton's behavior at the Super Bowl L press conference, so now he will drag down Peyton Manning. He could have been far more effective in his cause if he had simply written an objective piece about how the competitor in Cam Newton was gravely disappointed, answered several questions, and did not want to answer any more. After watching the Cam Newton press conference, I thought the questions were repetitive and boring--I would have walked out too.

So, his story is based upon "Titled "Facts of the Case," and submitted to the court by the plaintiff's lawyers . . . . . ."[roll]

Geez, if cases were decided on plaintiff's facts of the case, we would not need a justice system. We could just find for the plaintiff and be done with it. Agenda much, Shaun King?

It's really sad what we have become as a society. The divide over race appears to have gotten deeper, or at least it appears so based on the media's handling of stories like these.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUsSKii
csphi said:
You might want to do a little research on the author of the article
Click to expand...

Again..it's not about the author. I don't like him.

But everything in the article is backed up by the documents released. Might get have an agenda, sure. But the article seems accurate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soundcrib
Knight Shift said:
A few random things.
Shaun King (Wikipedia): "Jeffrey Shaun King (born 1979) is an American writer, entrepreneur, preacher and civil rights activist. He is noted for his use of social media to promote religious, charitable and social causes, including the Black Lives Matter movement." "King has written extensively about incidents in the Black Lives Matter movement, gaining prominence during the events following the shooting of Michael Brown. King wrote an article analyzing the Brown crime scene, and argued that the evidence suggested that officer Darren Wilson's life was not in danger during the shooting. " :rolleyes:

What's the story linked in the OP about?
"On the morning after Super Bowl 50, I posted a picture on my Facebook page of Cam Newton smiling and embracing Peyton Manning after the game and simply asked why that warm photo wasn't being talked about instead of Cam being frustrated at the post-game press conference. "

Most could have just stopped reading after looking at his bio and the quote to see where this was going. Call a Wahhhmbulance for Cam Newton, and while Shaun King is driving it, he can run over and drag Peyton Manning along.

Shaun King's piece is unfortunate--he doesn't like how a few folks (Bill Romanowski, Glen Beck, and some in the press) mistreated Cam Newton's behavior at the Super Bowl L press conference, so now he will drag down Peyton Manning. He could have been far more effective in his cause if he had simply written an objective piece about how the competitor in Cam Newton was gravely disappointed, answered several questions, and did not want to answer any more. After watching the Cam Newton press conference, I thought the questions were repetitive and boring--I would have walked out too.

So, his story is based upon "Titled "Facts of the Case," and submitted to the court by the plaintiff's lawyers . . . . . ."[roll]

Geez, if cases were decided on plaintiff's facts of the case, we would not need a justice system. We could just find for the plaintiff and be done with it. Agenda much, Shaun King?

It's really sad what we have become as a society. The divide over race appears to have gotten deeper, or at least it appears so based on the media's handling of stories like these.
Click to expand...

What are you thoughts on the Bill Cosby accusations? Let him go free?
 
formerlyknownasrutgers100 said:
If Jameis Winston won the Super Bowl this same writer would write an article about how he was able to overcome the racist lies of his white Florida state accuser and how the black star qb almost had his great chance taken away. This guy is one of the originators of BLM, and would never make mention of cam stealing a computer or anything else. Not saying if the article is true or false but the source I would say sucks
Click to expand...
I forgot to add what I said was sarcastic. I'm a huge Peyton fan and I refuse to read this article because it's bullshit. I agree with everything you said
 
biazza38 said:
I forgot to add what I said was sarcastic. I'm a huge Peyton fan and I refuse to read this article because it's bullshit. I agree with everything you said
Click to expand...

"Polk County Circuit Judge Harvey A. Kornstein not only denied the motion but put Peyton Manning, his father, and the others on blast. In his statement, he said:

"Even if the plaintiff is a public figure, the evidence of record contains sufficient evidence to satisfy the court that a genuine issue of material fact exists that would allow a jury to find, by clear and convincing evidence, the existence of actual malice of the part of the defendants.

"Specifically, there is evidence of record, substantial enough to suggest that the defendants knew that the passages in question were false, or acted in reckless disregard of their falsity. There is evidence of record to suggest that there were obvious reasons to doubt the veracity of Peyton Manning's account of the incident in question. The court further finds that there is sufficient evidence to permit the conclusion that the defendants entertained serious doubts as to the truth of the passages in this case."

In other words, Judge Kornstein said that there is evidence to support the conclusion that Peyton Manning lied in his book about the incidents and knew that he was lying about the incidents.

The court documents are damning to Peyton and Archie Manning.
 
RUtix4me said:
What are you thoughts on the Bill Cosby accusations? Let him go free?
Click to expand...
What does Bill Cosby have to do with Peyton Manning?
There have been numerous women who have come forward with similar allegations against Bill Cosby.
In Peyton's case, it's his word against her word. Incidentally, I dislike Peyton Manning. But I will not buy into agenda-based muckraking. If the victim felt that strongly about the case, she should have pressed forward. Relying on the plaintiff's statement of so-called "facts" is amateurish.

If you want to make a comparison--maybe Anita Hill and Justice Clarence Thomas is a better one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUsSKii
Abro1975 said:
"Polk County Circuit Judge Harvey A. Kornstein not only denied the motion but put Peyton Manning, his father, and the others on blast. In his statement, he said:

"Even if the plaintiff is a public figure, the evidence of record contains sufficient evidence to satisfy the court that a genuine issue of material fact exists that would allow a jury to find, by clear and convincing evidence, the existence of actual malice of the part of the defendants.

"Specifically, there is evidence of record, substantial enough to suggest that the defendants knew that the passages in question were false, or acted in reckless disregard of their falsity. There is evidence of record to suggest that there were obvious reasons to doubt the veracity of Peyton Manning's account of the incident in question. The court further finds that there is sufficient evidence to permit the conclusion that the defendants entertained serious doubts as to the truth of the passages in this case."

In other words, Judge Kornstein said that there is evidence to support the conclusion that Peyton Manning lied in his book about the incidents and knew that he was lying about the incidents.

The court documents are damning to Peyton and Archie Manning.
Click to expand...

I don't care enough to look into it deeper, but are they talking about the potty mouth story or the locker room story where Peyton allegedly dropped his drawers?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

cubuffsdoug

It the B1G a national conference and the SEC a regional conference?

Replies
22
Views
1K
Rutgers Football
angmo
angmo
bac2therac

BACATOLOGY: 2/13 NCAA TOURNAMENT ANALYSIS

Replies
344
Views
13K
Men's Basketball
bac2therac
bac2therac
RUinPinehurst

OT: UGA Beat Writer Calls for UNC to Lose AAU and SACS Membership

Replies
12
Views
2K
Rutgers Football
Caliknight
Caliknight
RUinPinehurst

OT: UNC Scandal Update... SI Article

Replies
28
Views
2K
Rutgers Football
e5fdny
e5fdny
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back