I placed a buy order (day) for AAPL before open today at $138.50. Missed it by fiddy cent. LOL.I believe Buffett brought his shares at $1,800 so I would assume that would be the bottom.
I brought a little Appl at $139 and MSFT AT $250.
I placed a buy order (day) for AAPL before open today at $138.50. Missed it by fiddy cent. LOL.I believe Buffett brought his shares at $1,800 so I would assume that would be the bottom.
I brought a little Appl at $139 and MSFT AT $250.
TWTR just cratered 20%+ as Musk put the deal on hold over review of spam numbers.
I’m guessing he is looking to re-negotiate the number. Many lawsuits to come…Someone should tell Elon that’s not how this works. The time for diligence was before the deal was signed. In todays M&A world, you don’t get to put deals on hold for further diligence at this stage.
I’m guessing he is looking to re-negotiate the number. Many lawsuits to come…
I bet he’ll try. Elon believes he’s above the deal-making norms and conventional thinking, as evidenced by the fact he announced the “hold” on Twitter. Class action law firms specializing in shareholder suits are mobilizing as I type. This will be interesting…Im sure he’d like to renegotiate, but, again, that ship has sailed.
Someone should tell Elon that’s not how this works. The time for diligence was before the deal was signed. In todays M&A world, you don’t get to put deals on hold for further diligence at this stage.
He can do all the due diligence he wants. He can renegotiate as well. He also might be able to make a case to not pay the breakup fee if these bot numbers are materially incorrect.
Announcing that randomly on twitter is another question. That seems like a Reg D violation but Musk doesn't seem to care about that as he's done it many times in the past.
No. There are no “outs” in today’s purchase and sale agreements. Certainly not for a go private. TWTR hired Goldman, not some flunky advisor. the standard for a MAC or material misrepresentation is extraordinarily high. He can try. He will lose and have to pay $1bn, at a minimum.
Let’s see who blinks first. Regardless, Musk is definitely getting sued over this and I suspect that the SEC finally steps in b/c of the announcement over Twitter. Unless of course, it’s somehow all part of Musk’s plan.There are no absolutes. Everything is negotiable. He may end up paying the $1B but at this point that could be well worth it to him to walk away.
Twitter is in trouble if he walks away. Nobody else seems interested in buying it but Musk.
Let’s see who blinks first. Regardless, Musk is definitely getting sued over this and I suspect that the SEC finally steps in b/c of the announcement over Twitter. Unless of course, it’s somehow all part of Musk’s plan.
There are no absolutes. Everything is negotiable. He may end up paying the $1B but at this point that could be well worth it to him to walk away.
Twitter is in trouble if he walks away. Nobody else seems interested in buying it but Musk.
in the case of M&A contracts, there are. Time for diligence is over. Time to live up to the contract.
If that was true, why has the spread been so wide since the announcement? It's because there has always been a big risk this wouldn't close.
Of course. it’s either a deal at $54.20 or a $1bn breakup fee. Both stipulated in the contract. He can’t raise his hand after the ink is dry and say, “um, I’d like more detail on the spam accounts…”. Doesn’t work that way.
Yes, the smart people knew Musk can’t close. The whole thing was a BS story to distract people about Tesla’s issue in China. He didn’t expect TWTR board to accept his bid. He doesn’t have any advantage in this space. His biggest problem is that he thinks he does.If that was true, why has the spread been so wide since the announcement? It's because there has always been a big risk this wouldn't close.
Can you highlight the clause that allows Musk to withdraw?I disagree. If he is right and those bot numbers are a lot higher than he can walk away without paying a fee because of a material change.
The devil is in the details of course and it will be determined by the language in the agreement which of course Musk knows better than you or me.
Yes, the smart people knew Musk can’t close. The whole thing was a BS story to distract people about Tesla’s issue in China. He didn’t expect TWTR board to accept his bid. He doesn’t have any advantage in this space. His biggest problem is that he thinks he does.
Can you highlight the clause that allows Musk to withdraw?
he is the luckiest SOB. Most of that billion is covered by the Tesla’s share he sold compared to the current price. What makes a ton of sense is that a large portion of his funding was a margin loan on a stock that has declined enough for a margin call already. He now realizes that this could be a total disaster for him.He's throwing away $1B and risking getting sued for much more to distract people from an issue that everyone knows about? That makes no sense.
he is the luckiest SOB. Most of that billion is covered by the Tesla’s share he sold compared to the current price. What makes a ton of sense is that a large portion of his funding was a margin loan on a stock that has declined enough for a margin call already. He now realizes that this could be a total disaster for him.
What you are forgetting is that Twitter didn’t sell him. He made an unsolicited offer to buy. You are obviously a Musk fan and trying to defend his irrational move. He is smart enough to say it’s temporarily on hold so they can’t go after him on the breakup fee yet.I haven't looked at the contract but there is always an out if the what the company claims (in this case the bots) is materially different than what they find in due diligence. What is material is where the argument begins. If they claim its 4% bots and its really 6% then it won't matter. If its north of 10% then it gets interesting.
It could be a number of issues but this is what Musk is referring too.
Also remember that if it is a lot different than they claim Twitter management suddenly has a big problem so they may work with Musk to keep themselves out of trouble.
Maybe just trying to get more people on TWTR.He just tweeted he is committed to the acquisition. LOL. This guy is a wild man.
What you are forgetting is that Twitter didn’t sell him. He made an unsolicited offer to buy. You are obviously a Musk fan and trying to defend his irrational move. He is smart enough to say it’s temporarily on hold so they can’t go after him on the breakup fee yet.
As a business, TWTR is a sinking ship. I know EM has a personal attachment to it, but seriously, focusing on TSLA and Space X is so much more important.TWTR just cratered 20%+ as Musk put the deal on hold over review of spam numbers.
If he announces he is out, that $1b breakup fee will be dwarfed by the pop in TSLA stock value.Of course. it’s either a deal at $54.20 or a $1bn breakup fee. Both stipulated in the contract. He can’t raise his hand after the ink is dry and say, “um, I’d like more detail on the spam accounts…”. Doesn’t work that way.
he is the luckiest SOB. Most of that billion is covered by the Tesla’s share he sold compared to the current price. What makes a ton of sense is that a large portion of his funding was a margin loan on a stock that has declined enough for a margin call already. He now realizes that this could be a total disaster for him.
…thanks to a call from his lawyers no doubt…He just tweeted he is committed to the acquisition. LOL. This guy is a wild man.
Are you implying that Musk will buy back the Tesla shares? Yeah, not happening.If he announces he is out, that $1b breakup fee will be dwarfed by the pop in TSLA stock value.
CNBC just said he waived his Right to due diligence. LOLI haven't looked at the contract but there is always an out if the what the company claims (in this case the bots) is materially different than what they find in due diligence. What is material is where the argument begins. If they claim its 4% bots and its really 6% then it won't matter. If its north of 10% then it gets interesting.
It could be a number of issues but this is what Musk is referring too.
Also remember that if it is a lot different than they claim Twitter management suddenly has a big problem so they may work with Musk to keep themselves out of trouble.
No, just that his existing shares will go up in value more than the $1b breakup fee.Are you implying that Musk will buy back the Tesla shares? Yeah, not happening.
CNBC just said he waived his Right to due diligence. LOL
I disagree. If he is right and those bot numbers are a lot higher than he can walk away without paying a fee because of a material change.
The devil is in the details of course and it will be determined by the language in the agreement which of course Musk knows better than you or me.
He just tweeted he is committed to the acquisition. LOL. This guy is a wild man.
But it wouldn’t be unusual to have a Purchase Price Adjustment provision in the Agreement that would correct/adjust for changes in financial conditions or other factors that could impact value of the company.Someone should tell Elon that’s not how this works. The time for diligence was before the deal was signed. In todays M&A world, you don’t get to put deals on hold for further diligence at this stage.
But it wouldn’t be unusual to have a Purchase Price Adjustment provision in the Agreement that would correct/adjust for changes in financial conditions or other factors that could impact value of the company.