Dealers say they love it 🤷♂️To all the druggies on the board, why is Fentanyl mixed in certain drugs anyway? Seems like a sure what to kill people.
Dealers say they love it 🤷♂️To all the druggies on the board, why is Fentanyl mixed in certain drugs anyway? Seems like a sure what to kill people.
Drug dealers must often be sociopaths/psychopaths. They view it as a game and you lost. You knew the rules. The only regret is a lost customer.
Rabbit hole? What's up with that doc? 😃You're going down the twisted rabbit hole as usual.
Some people cherish the Oklahoma crime rate because they like think its red hat guys popping each other off.
The truth is that indian reservations (40% of Oklahoma) are full of violent crimes.
Most broken economic areas will have more crime, addiction etc
There are some criminals who commit crimes off the reservation and then run to them after the crime, and declare that as aboriginal Americans they are under different enforcement.
For a college oriented board its crazy how so many people struggle with any facts on any issue.
Say the sky is blue and cadres will descend on you talking about prisms and the blue color is just ilusion
Hopefully you don't mean me. I'm not blaming anybody for anything in this thread.Two of the most lovable and logical posters have now blamed crime on Muslims and American Indians - Cant make this shit up
I'm not sure why you felt it necessary to drag American Indians into the discussion.
Oklahoma is a very high crime state. The murder rate in OKC is several times higher that of NYC.
I looked up the murder statistics for Oklahoma.. I could only find 2020. Out of 287 murders, 32 American Indians were murdered. That is only 11%.Oklahoma was brought-up as a "very high crime state".
Of course I knew why - Indians on reservations
I am merely showing how inaccurate Ashokan's theory is. Actually, crime in NYC in 2023 was down from 2022. Murders and shootings decreased.Who cares about Oklahoma’s crime stats.
Want to study violent areas, start with nyc the past 12 months. It’s surging
Hopefully you don't mean me. I'm not blaming anybody for anything in this thread.
I'm wondering why two posters felt it necessary to dredge up stuff about a Muslim guy and American Indians. I can't see the relevance to the thread topic.
I am merely showing how inaccurate Ashokan's theory is. Actually, crime in NYC in 2023 was down from 2022. Murders and shootings decreased.
Now you are being an asshole! Look up the statistics.Dude just stop it already with your fake stats.
We all know nyc has gotten way more violent - it’s outta control and degrading by the day. don’t be a stooge here please.
Ashokan doesn’t have a theory either , but would you be happier if he said per scouts the most crime is committed by Blacks in Oklahoma? Who cares about Oklahoma
@Knight Owl brought up a nutty dude that beheaded his dad in PA. He didn't feel it necessary to discuss anybody's ethnicity or religion.Oklahoma was brought-up as a "very high crime state".
Of course I knew why - Indians on reservations
The Muslim guy was brought up since he was involved in another case involving the lopping off of somebody’s head.
Previously in this thread, a separate poster, whom you have chosen not to mention, interjected another crime story involving a beheading.
So one beheading story naturally reminds some of another beheading story.
Eventually fentanyl will reach the end of all the customers who are willing to risk their lives trying it and there will be no more customers.... and the world will be a better place.Sorry, but this is not having a joint. Too many people just take way too many risks with this shit and think nothing will happen to them. Part of it certainly the youth factor, but just dumb.
Just stop. It’s a really bad look for you BOB.Now you are being an asshole! Look up the statistics.
Look up the statistics! Try thinking before you post. My original post had nothing to do with you. As usual you criticize anything that doesn't support your agenda.Just stop. It’s a really bad look for you BOB.
I’m telling you for your own good.
@Knight Owl brought up a nutty dude that beheaded his dad in PA. He didn't feel it necessary to discuss anybody's ethnicity or religion.
@newell138 brought up another nutjob right here in NJ who beheaded his mom. No mention of religion or ethnicity.
@NewJerseyGuy then posted about a beheading in OK at some unspecified point in the past. He, for reasons known only to him, felt it important to note the killer's religion. Why mention religion? How is it relevant?
@NotInRHouse responded to my query about why NJG posted what he posted by saying there's lots of crime in OK. No mention of ethnicity or religion.
Then you came along and posted about American Indians committing lots of killings in OK. And once again, I asked what the point of mentioning that (the ethnicity) was? Were you offering counterpoint to NJG's religious reference? I don't get the relevance to the thread topic.
Does a person being killed by a Muslim or American Indian make that person more dead than when killed by someone of a different religion or ethnicity? Why bring it up?
You are forever complaining about all the terrible problems with the country, cultural things, political things, etc. Lately you've taken to saying we're all doomed in America.
So why are you so compelled to assess blame for violence in OK along ethnic lines but, when you point out all the problems with our country, you never exhibit the same compulsion to note the race, gender and religion of the people who, until very recently, have had a near-complete stranglehold on the nation's leadership?
Patterns of behavior, ash; they're inescapable.
I totally understand bringing up a beheading. I fail to understand the relevance of noting the killer's religion. Nobody else but you and ash have felt it necessary to introduce religion or ethnicity.The Muslim guy was brought up since he was involved in another case involving the lopping off of somebody’s head.
Previously in this thread, a separate poster, whom you have chosen not to mention, interjected another crime story involving a beheading.
So one beheading story naturally reminds some of another beheading story.
Nice try but I never once told you what you can say. I merely asked you why you felt it necessary to point out the religion of the killer.With each thread that is posted going forward, please advise the board as to which topics may be discussed therein. This way we can be sure not to offend your delicate feelings.
Thanks.
Look up the statistics! Try thinking before you post. My original post had nothing to do with you. As usual you criticize anything that doesn't support your agenda.
I totally understand bringing up a beheading. I fail to understand the relevance of noting the killer's religion. Nobody else but you and ash have felt it necessary to introduce religion or ethnicity.
When people introduce those things into a discussion that way, the implication is that the religion or the ethnicity are actually important factors in relation to the thread topic (frozen dudes, possibly from OD). But that's clearly untrue in this thread.
When irrelevantly introducing race, religion, gender to a discussion in a negative way, there are potential implications that result in collateral negative portrayal of lots of perfectly innocent individuals. You don't like it when people say stuff you view as negative portrayal of Christians. So why would do that to Muslims?
cx c 6680960, member: 4138"]Now I have an agenda?
Are you starting to drift into the insanity herd with brg and NutHouse?
I tell it like it is bruh and you know it
Nice try but I never once told you what you can say. I merely asked you why you felt it necessary to point out the religion of the killer.
A question you continue to avoid answering. How is the killer's religion relevant? Why did you bring it up?
Angry? Triggered? 🤣I believe your anger here is misplaced.
I propose that your anger should be directed at the Muslim fellow who lopped off the head of his coworker in Oklahoma because she refused to convert to Islam.
Rather than seething at me for bringing up the context of the prior beheading crime.
I am sorry for getting under your skin. I didn’t realize it would trigger you.
Now? That dude has always been an asshole.Now you are being an asshole! Look up the statistics.
Nobody else introduced ethnicity or religion. Only you and ash.The other poster, who earlier brought up a beheading crime, offered the context surrounding that crime.
You did not complain.
Yet when I mentioned the context surrounding the Muslim head-lopping incident in Oklahoma, you continue to complain vociferously.
Weird.
Nobody else introduced ethnicity or religion. Only you and ash.
Can you explain that? Or are you going to once again attempt to deflect attention away from it. It’s a simple question. How is the religion of some past killer relevant to some frozen guys after the playoff game?
I don’t understand why you can’t answer the question. Here, look…
NJG: mildone, why don’t you mention the religion of the killers?
mildone: Happy to. Because it’s totally irrelevant.
See. Easy. Now you go:
mildone: NJG, why did you bring up the religion of some past killer?
<hint: try not deflecting this time>
The other poster, who earlier brought up a beheading crime, offered the context surrounding that crime.
You did not complain.
Yet when I mentioned the context surrounding the Muslim head-lopping incident in Oklahoma, you continue to complain vociferously.
Weird.
The other poster, who earlier brought up a beheading crime, offered the context surrounding that crime.
You did not complain.
Yet when I mentioned the context surrounding the Muslim head-lopping incident in Oklahoma, you continue to complain vociferously.
Weird.
Now? That dude has always been an asshole.
Not you but same two you are referring to…Hopefully you don't mean me. I'm not blaming anybody for anything in this thread.
I'm wondering why two posters felt it necessary to dredge up stuff about a Muslim guy and American Indians. I can't see the relevance to the thread topic.
Yes, religion was indeed relevant to that particular crime. But it was in no way relevant to anything posted in this thread up to that point (or since, except for by you).Religion is the crux of the matter in the Muslim head-lopping incident. Was the motive.
To my knowledge, religion doesn’t seem to be the motive of the other head-lopping incidents. So those who posted about those incidents didn’t mention it.
Yet other potential motives were discussed, which for some reason did not trigger you as much.
Wow. Please take several deep breaths and try to enjoy your weekend.
Yes, religion was indeed relevant to that particular crime. But it was in no way relevant to anything posted in this thread up to that point (or since, except for by you).
Look, as mentioned by insanity just above, we both know exactly why you brought up religion in that case. So does anybody else who ever spent any time on the CE board in the past few years.
I'm actually more curious about why you're so shy about making your true views on Muslims known to the broader Rutgers community out here in the FB forum. Do you perhaps sense that such views might not be entirely welcome by most people?
You have a good weekend too. Remember, Jesus wants us to love one another.
Okay, good. I realize I'm being a little childish in the way I tease people who make such posts.Not you but same two you are referring to…
I am merely showing how inaccurate Ashokan's theory is. Actually, crime in NYC in 2023 was down from 2022. Murders and shootings decreased.
What personal attack?Now here comes the crumbling of your ill-constructed points, marked by the inevitable personal attacks.
Same old, same old.
Hahaha.
@Knight Owl brought up a nutty dude that beheaded his dad in PA. He didn't feel it necessary to discuss anybody's ethnicity or religion.
@newell138 brought up another nutjob right here in NJ who beheaded his mom. No mention of religion or ethnicity.
@NewJerseyGuy then posted about a beheading in OK at some unspecified point in the past. He, for reasons known only to him, felt it important to note the killer's religion. Why mention religion? How is it relevant?
@NotInRHouse responded to my query about why NJG posted what he posted by saying there's lots of crime in OK. No mention of ethnicity or religion.
Then you came along and posted about American Indians committing lots of killings in OK. And once again, I asked what the point of mentioning that (the ethnicity) was? Were you offering counterpoint to NJG's religious reference? I don't get the relevance to the thread topic.
Does a person being killed by a Muslim or American Indian make that person more dead than when killed by someone of a different religion or ethnicity? Why bring it up?
You are forever complaining about all the terrible problems with the country, cultural things, political things, etc. Lately you've taken to saying we're all doomed in America.
So why are you so compelled to assess blame for violence in OK along ethnic lines but, when you point out all the problems with our country, you never exhibit the same compulsion to note the race, gender and religion of the people who, until very recently, have had a near-complete stranglehold on the nation's leadership?
Patterns of behavior, ash; they're inescapable.
Wait wut? The government and media cannot be relied upon. But that bastion of purity in reporting, the NY Post, can? Hm... 🤣Nobody savvy relies of gov states and media.
Comparing crime rates to 2019 show just how dangerous ‘reforms’ have been
Crime is down a statistically insignificant 0.77% this year compared to 2022, but it is a hefty 33.7% higher than it was in 2019, before bail reform and discovery reform trashed our criminal justic…nypost.com
So now virtuousness is bad? No wonder the world is going to hell in a handbasket. 😃Your virtue signals are acknowledged and recorded