ADVERTISEMENT

OT - WTF

What a ****ed up person. I cant believe someone could do that.

"The victim wears a diaper and requires assistance with basic needs such as eating, walking and bathing and has the mental capacity of a toddler"

"Stubblefield admitted taking him out of the wheelchair, putting him on the floor in her office, removing his diaper and performing oral sex on the victim on one occasion.

She admitted engaging in vaginal intercourse at her Rutgers University office,"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarletwoman
Think this RU-Newark but yeesh they may want to check their tenure procedures this woman was the Dept Chair? :flushed:
 
It's a very strange story. The short gist is that she's a long-time advocate for people with disabilities, including arguing that people with conditions like cerebral palsy are much more capable of making their own decisions than most people think. She told his family that he and she were in love, and has said consistently that everything they did was consensual. The family disagreed, and so did the prosecutor and, ultimately, the jury. (There's a whole separate controversy about the assisted communication techniques she used and whether they really reflect what the patient is thinking or what the person doing the assisting is thinking, and it plays into this, too.)

Even if she's right about his mental capacity, though, it seems to me that there are significant ethics issues involved when she's supposed to be interpreting what he says.
 
  • Like
Reactions: retired711
It's a very strange story. The short gist is that she's a long-time advocate for people with disabilities, including arguing that people with conditions like cerebral palsy are much more capable of making their own decisions than most people think. She told his family that he and she were in love, and has said consistently that everything they did was consensual. The family disagreed, and so did the prosecutor and, ultimately, the jury. (There's a whole separate controversy about the assisted communication techniques she used and whether they really reflect what the patient is thinking or what the person doing the assisting is thinking, and it plays into this, too.)

Even if she's right about his mental capacity, though, it seems to me that there are significant ethics issues involved when she's supposed to be interpreting what he says.
Long but excellent read for anyone interested in the details of the case:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/magazine/the-strange-case-of-anna-stubblefield.html?_r=0
 
there is a special place in hell for people like this. Hopefully she gets an advanced glance at it in prison.
 
I have two degrees in Special Education. Although there are many levels of a number of recognized disabilities, this is simply not where you go under any circumstances.
As already mentioned, this woman has a serious problem of her own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeRU0304
What kind of jack ass injects politics into something like this?

What the hell is wrong with you?

I was going for a philosophy reference, nothing political.

Objectivism isn't political. It's a philosophy that suggests that we decide on an Individual level what is morally acceptable.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ruready07
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT