ADVERTISEMENT

Phew! Dodged a Bullet!

also was schiano actually succeeding guaranteed, yet he gets a 25million guarantee???
and I like schiano
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersal
Then you are talking the level of Urban. I was ok with Greg, because as you can see he could have handled the drama. He understood the culture of Jersey. His methods may have not played out well in other places just like Ash did not play out well here based on his past experience. Greg to me was the bridge to get us back on track. Give him the 8years and what he needed. He has seen big programs and understands whats needs. He would have been 60+. Retire and know he got us back to respectability. Them move someone up from the ranks the has been there for a while to assume command.
 


Who needs Dolan and his money when we have lacrosse...that major sport the makes the school hundreds of millions. You are right Cali, we dodged a bullet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUSK97 and scripts
They did not offer him 8 yrs.

From NJAM

Rutgers had originally offered the same salary to the former coach for a six-year, $24 million deal, according to a source familiar with the offer. The source said Schiano’s agent countered on Tuesday, asking for eight years. and additional perks. The source said that the counter offer was never presented to the university’s board of governors, and was ultimately rejected by Rutgers Athletic Director Patrick Hobbs.

This is heresy as is the "leaked" terms list. Looks more like one sides requirements NOT agreed upon terms. However if the terms were agreed upon and Schiano didnt sign then it is definitely all on him. Requiring more that what was presented would be outlandish
 
The never Schianos are flat out delusional thinking anyone with any kind of recognizable name or potential to advance their career would come here. The best thing about Schiano is that he wanted to be here for a long time. Idiots.

His walking away over timing of infrastructure and even the possibility of his not getting his building built rather refitting the Hale Center is crap. If he walked because of 6 and not 8 guaranteed then that is crap too. If he was a good coach he should have this program soaring in 4cyears max which would give him a five to six year extension so why would a Coach selling himself as a winner as the answer need thec2 extra years guaranteed? Unless he didnt think he could do what he speaks of. Seems to beca weak excuse not having 2 additional guaranteed years. Seems like a money grab to me. Basically Havent been able to find a job this is probably my last paycheck let me rapecand pillage
 
the OP doesnt give a shit, he doesnt go to games or really follow much, no skin off his back, the next hire will be some low level that he will endorse much like he endorsed Ash when he was hired...that big time alpha right there

He gives a fair amount of money to the school - something that you've never done.

The mental midget that is @bac2therac fails to acknowledge - here, as on all other topics - that it's entirely reasonable to have differing points of view with equal validity.

Schiano would definitely have an impact here. But, as others have pointed out, hiring him as a head coach is absolutely not without risk. He's a solid recruiter, he's got an innate sense of "New Jersey", but he's also got a list of flaws that are well-understood.

Giving him absolute oversight of all things related to football would be a mistake. The money isn't really an issue. The infrastructure improvements, likewise (although the timeline he insisted upon was too aggressive). But to essentially make him King of Rutgers Football, with discretionary powers over all decisions related thereto, is a bridge too far for any responsible administrator.
 
If you are giving 8 years and $4MM to a coach plus everything else, I need to see someone that is a winner. Someone who has won a real championship at any level.

Schiano was a great coach for the time he was here. That was a different era. Bring me a current winner or someone who is actually employed.

If we are giving away the whole farm, show me a winner.
No “winner” has been knocking down our door. Donors pissed, zero ticket renewals but Yeah us
 
  • Like
Reactions: loyalty_policia
I understand the disappointment the fan base has not getting Schiano but in my opinion the second acts never work out. I was always hesitant about Schiano. Rutgers needs to find an up and coming Head Coach who can recruit and will be our Schiano of the future. Now trusting Rutgers to do that is where I have serious doubts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scarletbergen
Im excited to see where this is headed.. I think Hobbs gets us winner. I fully trust in Hobbs
 
Time for new blood. G.S. thought 8 years, 32 million wasn’t enough?? Well, good luck finding that deal somewhere else.
 
Im excited to see where this is headed.. I think Hobbs gets us winner. I fully trust in Hobbs
Yeah the list of names is incredible: Addazio, Chris Creighton, Jason Candle, Lance Leipold, Jeff Hafley, Anthony Campanile and Jedd Fisch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: loyalty_policia
And he demanded 8 years and $32MM.

What's your point.

Then Hobbs didn’t even present that to the BOG, which leads me to believe the BOG said 6 years was best and final or Hobbs didn’t want GS and just killed the deal on the spot.

Either way I think GS over played his hand. Not wanting to have a boss, demanding we blow up the Hale...all sounds like things someone asks for when they don’t actually want the job but if you’ll give them everything, ok fine they’ll take the job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolv RU
And he demanded 8 years and $32MM.

What's your point.
You can't figure it out?

The poster I responded too keeps posting GREG TURNED DOWN 8 YRS 32M when that is what Greg countered with when he did not get his fieldhouse. Greg was NEVER OFFERED 8 yrs 32M. Whoever keeps saying that 8/32 was not enough for Greg IS A FUKKING IDIOT becuase that is not what he was offered. Did I make it simple enough for you to understand?
 
You can't figure it out?

The poster I responded too keeps posting GREG TURNED DOWN 8 YRS 32M when that is what Greg countered with when he did not get his fieldhouse. Greg was NEVER OFFERED 8 yrs 32M. Whoever keeps saying that 8/32 was not enough for Greg IS A FUKKING IDIOT becuase that is not what he was offered. Did I make it simple enough for you to understand?

It's worth pointing out, just for the sake of fairness, that Hobbs was excoriated for allegedly giving Ash a 7 year contract (although there's some nuance there that people refuse to acknowledge).

So what's the talking point if, 5 years down the road, we're sitting on an 8 year Schiano contract and he's yet to win a B1G game? I'm not saying that's the expectation, but you can't rule it out as a possibility.

Six years really is fair. By absolutely any metric, six years for an initial contract is fair. So maybe Greg needs to come off the eight year thing, take the six with an option to extend based on performance. I think that gets the deal done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ru66 and Wolv RU
It's worth pointing out, just for the sake of fairness, that Hobbs was excoriated for allegedly giving Ash a 7 year contract (although there's some nuance there that people refuse to acknowledge).

So what's the talking point if, 5 years down the road, we're sitting on an 8 year Schiano contract and he's yet to win a B1G game? I'm not saying that's the expectation, but you can't rule it out as a possibility.

Six years really is fair. By absolutely any metric, six years for an initial contract is fair. So maybe Greg needs to come off the eight year thing, take the six with an option to extend based on performance. I think that gets the deal done.

From I have heard and read, Greg only went to the 8 yr request when we rejected the fieldhouse. Maybe at that point he really didn't want it any more once he realized that we were not going to give him what he wanted? Or maybe he felt it is going to take longer without the full commitment from the University.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scripts
We are finally big time. Schiano is a retread from a bygone era. He will never coach another p5 team again, much less a B1 G school.

I have to agree. I too think you dodged a bullet if the info of what was offered to Schiano is correct. I just don't think he is worth that investment. I imagine your administration is waiting to see which coaches come available after the season ends. I very much wish you the best in finding the right guy.
 
He gives a fair amount of money to the school - something that you've never done.

The mental midget that is @bac2therac fails to acknowledge - here, as on all other topics - that it's entirely reasonable to have differing points of view with equal validity.

Schiano would definitely have an impact here. But, as others have pointed out, hiring him as a head coach is absolutely not without risk. He's a solid recruiter, he's got an innate sense of "New Jersey", but he's also got a list of flaws that are well-understood.

Giving him absolute oversight of all things related to football would be a mistake. The money isn't really an issue. The infrastructure improvements, likewise (although the timeline he insisted upon was too aggressive). But to essentially make him King of Rutgers Football, with discretionary powers over all decisions related thereto, is a bridge too far for any responsible administrator.
Great post. Hiring him would have been a immediate boost for the program as far as ticket sales, probably grab a few nice recruits. But what happens after the luster wears off in 2-3 seasons when UM, OSU, MSU, PSU are still beating his brains in on national tv. Instead of one WVU he couldn’t beat, he would have 5 of them. Now your stuck with a guy approaching 60 who nobody else is going to hire way from you and your holding the bag on $32million contract. Good decision by RU for the long run.
 
Great post. Hiring him would have been a immediate boost for the program as far as ticket sales, probably grab a few nice recruits. But what happens after the luster wears off in 2-3 seasons when UM, OSU, MSU, PSU are still beating his brains in on national tv. Instead of one WVU he couldn’t beat, he would have 5 of them. Now your stuck with a guy approaching 60 who nobody else is going to hire way from you and your holding the bag on $32million contract. Good decision by RU for the long run.
Yeah, who needs excitement at the stadium.
 
  • Like
Reactions: loyalty_policia
Great post. Hiring him would have been a immediate boost for the program as far as ticket sales, probably grab a few nice recruits. But what happens after the luster wears off in 2-3 seasons when UM, OSU, MSU, PSU are still beating his brains in on national tv. Instead of one WVU he couldn’t beat, he would have 5 of them. Now your stuck with a guy approaching 60 who nobody else is going to hire way from you and your holding the bag on $32million contract. Good decision by RU for the long run.
He is a tireless worker with one of the best eyes for talent in the industry. If you give him time and resources he will absolutely outperform our other options. This is a massive loss for the program. I can not blame anyone for giving up on Rutgers athletics at this point.
 
Your exact quote was: "G.S. thought 8 years, 32 million wasn’t enough?? Well, good luck finding that deal somewhere else."

GS's counter offer was 8/32 so apparently he thought that was good enough since that is what he asked for when they didn't give him fieldhouse...which means your statement above is INCORRECT.

How is that for EXACTLY.
 
He is a tireless worker with one of the best eyes for talent in the industry. If you give him time and resources he will absolutely outperform our other options. This is a massive loss for the program. I can not blame anyone for giving up on Rutgers athletics at this point.
Yet couldn’t produce anything but the worst defense in Buckeye history last season with all that talent. He’s awesome. I’m sure his agent didn’t sleep a wink last night fielding all the calls from the big boy programs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jerzeyguy
Yeah, who needs excitement at the stadium.
Absolute excitement for a season, mayyybeee two? Then a stadium full of people dressed as empty seats, blow loss after blow loss and an ego maniac owed 25 million and no incentive to work any harder bc his career is over anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jerzeyguy
Great post. Hiring him would have been a immediate boost for the program as far as ticket sales, probably grab a few nice recruits. But what happens after the luster wears off in 2-3 seasons when UM, OSU, MSU, PSU are still beating his brains in on national tv. Instead of one WVU he couldn’t beat, he would have 5 of them. Now your stuck with a guy approaching 60 who nobody else is going to hire way from you and your holding the bag on $32million contract. Good decision by RU for the long run.
That is not quite accurate....they would have been stuck with 25M as that was all that was guaranteed. Greg's counter proposal had 25M guaranteed. So after year 4 he would have been guaranteed 9M and you could have canned him. So not on hook for 32M.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scripts and JRZEER
Absolute excitement for a season, mayyybeee two? Then a stadium full of people dressed as empty seats, blow loss after blow loss and an ego maniac owed 25 million and no incentive to work any harder bc his career is over anyway.
Yes, let’s have no excitement plus the blowout losses and save 2mm per year. Why bother firing Ash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scripts
also was schiano actually succeeding guaranteed, yet he gets a 25million guarantee???
and I like schiano
6 years at $4M is $24M... $25 million is fair.. and that is if he was fired WITHOUT CAUSE.

Ash was basically guaranteed 7 years at $2.5M or so.. that's a guarantee of almost $12M. Would you rather have a guy at half the price who destroyed your fan base and game and donation revenue or a guy who built that fan base and revenue stream to where it was for double the price?

The 8 years instead of the indoor practice facility was just a way of saying "I told you what I need to get it turned around and without that facility it will take me longer".

Just go back to 6 years and a facility that every other Big Ten program already has or do the 8 years. 7 years was fair given where Flood/Ash/Hobbs has left us. What's an extra year?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: loyalty_policia
They don't go to games, buy tickets and parking or donate. Yet they have their stupid opinion with no solution.
Hey @WhiteBus, how long you been doing this? For me it is 43 years. What evidence from our past suggests Rutgers got this right and dodged a bullet? NONE

“I have heard from no less than 10 big donors and supporters who are canceling tickets and pledges for gifts, some changing their estate bequest language to remove Rutgers,'' one Rutgers insider said. "It’s really bad.''

Anyone who thinks Rutgers got this right is delusional and needs to get their head examined.
 
Last edited:
Skeptical of what? And why do you KnighShift make arguments to things that don't exist? Nobody suggested Hobbs did anything other than what he was told. This thread was started by saying Greg was offered 8/32M and I pointed out that is not what he was offered.
Have you ready any of the other 500 threads calling to fire Hobbs? People on this board really think he could make that decision on his own without some knowledge of what the final offer would have been.
 
Have you ready any of the other 500 threads calling to fire Hobbs? People on this board really think he could make that decision on his own without some knowledge of what the final offer would have been.
Again why are you making a rebuttal to something was was never said or implied?

It seems people CANNOT be open-minded enough to take things at face value. My original post simply corrected the fallacy that 8yr/32M was not enough for Greg. Greg was not offered that...he countered with that when he did not get fieldhouse. That is it no other purpose to original post. Yet, folks repeatedly keep bringing up rebuttal points to things I never suggested. Where did I say Hobbs made this decision on his own?
 
I understand the disappointment the fan base has not getting Schiano but in my opinion the second acts never work out. I was always hesitant about Schiano. Rutgers needs to find an up and coming Head Coach who can recruit and will be our Schiano of the future. Now trusting Rutgers to do that is where I have serious doubts.
Fire Hobbs First
 
Greg got offered a better contract here than he did in Tennessee... a power program in the SEC and with looking to get serious with facility improvements ...

I think he has the best resume of the coacnhes that we can afford...and $4 million a year and $7.5 million for staff really should have got things started for him

He overplayed his hand here ....especially with the control and autonomy he wanted of the program. He should have known this isn’t possible anywhere given what happened at penn state. And while I’m sure a lot of those concerns come with having an AD with no football experience and not knowing who the next school president is, he knows that wasn’t going to fly here. Period.

So while I don’t know if we dodged a bullet, he asked in totality too nuch for what he has accomplished.

I agree with this view...GS overplayed his hand....I think he was shooting for the moon to coach here...He thought if they (RU) agreed to his high demands...whoopie he coaches...if not, he's happy dealing with family and faith.

If he really wanted to come he would have accepted and then worked on the new president, knowing that Hobbs would be on thin ice considering the Ash hire/fire costs
 
Again why are you making a rebuttal to something was was never said or implied?

It seems people CANNOT be open-minded enough to take things at face value. My original post simply corrected the fallacy that 8yr/32M was not enough for Greg. Greg was not offered that...he countered with that when he did not get fieldhouse. That is it no other purpose to original post. Yet, folks repeatedly keep bringing up rebuttal points to things I never suggested. Where did I say Hobbs made this decision on his own?
Who are you? I wasn't even replying to anything you said. Maybe it's time to stop drinking and yelling on a message board about things you clearly don't understand. Why don't you go sign a petition to help fire an AD who didn't want to give an unemployed coach 8/32 with $24 million guaranteed (Saban type of guarantee) after that same AD got bashed for giving a guy 7/10 guaranteed.
 
Who are you? I wasn't even replying to anything you said. Maybe it's time to stop drinking and yelling on a message board about things you clearly don't understand. Why don't you go sign a petition to help fire an AD who didn't want to give an unemployed coach 8/32 with $24 million guaranteed (Saban type of guarantee) after that same AD got bashed for giving a guy 7/10 guaranteed.
Go look at post #113 you replied to my post imbecile.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT