Guaranteed money was top of league. Greg might be delusional, but he ain’t stupid.Truth. This money is in the bottom 1/3 of the B1G.
They did not offer him 8 yrs.
From NJAM
Rutgers had originally offered the same salary to the former coach for a six-year, $24 million deal, according to a source familiar with the offer. The source said Schiano’s agent countered on Tuesday, asking for eight years. and additional perks. The source said that the counter offer was never presented to the university’s board of governors, and was ultimately rejected by Rutgers Athletic Director Patrick Hobbs.
The never Schianos are flat out delusional thinking anyone with any kind of recognizable name or potential to advance their career would come here. The best thing about Schiano is that he wanted to be here for a long time. Idiots.
the OP doesnt give a shit, he doesnt go to games or really follow much, no skin off his back, the next hire will be some low level that he will endorse much like he endorsed Ash when he was hired...that big time alpha right there
No “winner” has been knocking down our door. Donors pissed, zero ticket renewals but Yeah usIf you are giving 8 years and $4MM to a coach plus everything else, I need to see someone that is a winner. Someone who has won a real championship at any level.
Schiano was a great coach for the time he was here. That was a different era. Bring me a current winner or someone who is actually employed.
If we are giving away the whole farm, show me a winner.
Time for new blood. G.S. thought 8 years, 32 million wasn’t enough?? Well, good luck finding that deal somewhere else.
He was offered 6 yrs 24 M but keep repeating incorrect info.Time for new blood. G.S. thought 8 years, 32 million wasn’t enough?? Well, good luck finding that deal somewhere else.
He was offered 6 yrs 24 M but keep repeating incorrect info.
Yeah the list of names is incredible: Addazio, Chris Creighton, Jason Candle, Lance Leipold, Jeff Hafley, Anthony Campanile and Jedd Fisch.Im excited to see where this is headed.. I think Hobbs gets us winner. I fully trust in Hobbs
And he demanded 8 years and $32MM.
What's your point.
You can't figure it out?And he demanded 8 years and $32MM.
What's your point.
You can't figure it out?
The poster I responded too keeps posting GREG TURNED DOWN 8 YRS 32M when that is what Greg countered with when he did not get his fieldhouse. Greg was NEVER OFFERED 8 yrs 32M. Whoever keeps saying that 8/32 was not enough for Greg IS A FUKKING IDIOT becuase that is not what he was offered. Did I make it simple enough for you to understand?
It's worth pointing out, just for the sake of fairness, that Hobbs was excoriated for allegedly giving Ash a 7 year contract (although there's some nuance there that people refuse to acknowledge).
So what's the talking point if, 5 years down the road, we're sitting on an 8 year Schiano contract and he's yet to win a B1G game? I'm not saying that's the expectation, but you can't rule it out as a possibility.
Six years really is fair. By absolutely any metric, six years for an initial contract is fair. So maybe Greg needs to come off the eight year thing, take the six with an option to extend based on performance. I think that gets the deal done.
We are finally big time. Schiano is a retread from a bygone era. He will never coach another p5 team again, much less a B1 G school.
Great post. Hiring him would have been a immediate boost for the program as far as ticket sales, probably grab a few nice recruits. But what happens after the luster wears off in 2-3 seasons when UM, OSU, MSU, PSU are still beating his brains in on national tv. Instead of one WVU he couldn’t beat, he would have 5 of them. Now your stuck with a guy approaching 60 who nobody else is going to hire way from you and your holding the bag on $32million contract. Good decision by RU for the long run.He gives a fair amount of money to the school - something that you've never done.
The mental midget that is @bac2therac fails to acknowledge - here, as on all other topics - that it's entirely reasonable to have differing points of view with equal validity.
Schiano would definitely have an impact here. But, as others have pointed out, hiring him as a head coach is absolutely not without risk. He's a solid recruiter, he's got an innate sense of "New Jersey", but he's also got a list of flaws that are well-understood.
Giving him absolute oversight of all things related to football would be a mistake. The money isn't really an issue. The infrastructure improvements, likewise (although the timeline he insisted upon was too aggressive). But to essentially make him King of Rutgers Football, with discretionary powers over all decisions related thereto, is a bridge too far for any responsible administrator.
Exactly!And he demanded 8 years and $32MM.
What's your point.
Yeah, who needs excitement at the stadium.Great post. Hiring him would have been a immediate boost for the program as far as ticket sales, probably grab a few nice recruits. But what happens after the luster wears off in 2-3 seasons when UM, OSU, MSU, PSU are still beating his brains in on national tv. Instead of one WVU he couldn’t beat, he would have 5 of them. Now your stuck with a guy approaching 60 who nobody else is going to hire way from you and your holding the bag on $32million contract. Good decision by RU for the long run.
He is a tireless worker with one of the best eyes for talent in the industry. If you give him time and resources he will absolutely outperform our other options. This is a massive loss for the program. I can not blame anyone for giving up on Rutgers athletics at this point.Great post. Hiring him would have been a immediate boost for the program as far as ticket sales, probably grab a few nice recruits. But what happens after the luster wears off in 2-3 seasons when UM, OSU, MSU, PSU are still beating his brains in on national tv. Instead of one WVU he couldn’t beat, he would have 5 of them. Now your stuck with a guy approaching 60 who nobody else is going to hire way from you and your holding the bag on $32million contract. Good decision by RU for the long run.
Your exact quote was: "G.S. thought 8 years, 32 million wasn’t enough?? Well, good luck finding that deal somewhere else."Exactly!
Yet couldn’t produce anything but the worst defense in Buckeye history last season with all that talent. He’s awesome. I’m sure his agent didn’t sleep a wink last night fielding all the calls from the big boy programs.He is a tireless worker with one of the best eyes for talent in the industry. If you give him time and resources he will absolutely outperform our other options. This is a massive loss for the program. I can not blame anyone for giving up on Rutgers athletics at this point.
Absolute excitement for a season, mayyybeee two? Then a stadium full of people dressed as empty seats, blow loss after blow loss and an ego maniac owed 25 million and no incentive to work any harder bc his career is over anyway.Yeah, who needs excitement at the stadium.
That is not quite accurate....they would have been stuck with 25M as that was all that was guaranteed. Greg's counter proposal had 25M guaranteed. So after year 4 he would have been guaranteed 9M and you could have canned him. So not on hook for 32M.Great post. Hiring him would have been a immediate boost for the program as far as ticket sales, probably grab a few nice recruits. But what happens after the luster wears off in 2-3 seasons when UM, OSU, MSU, PSU are still beating his brains in on national tv. Instead of one WVU he couldn’t beat, he would have 5 of them. Now your stuck with a guy approaching 60 who nobody else is going to hire way from you and your holding the bag on $32million contract. Good decision by RU for the long run.
Yes, let’s have no excitement plus the blowout losses and save 2mm per year. Why bother firing Ash.Absolute excitement for a season, mayyybeee two? Then a stadium full of people dressed as empty seats, blow loss after blow loss and an ego maniac owed 25 million and no incentive to work any harder bc his career is over anyway.
6 years at $4M is $24M... $25 million is fair.. and that is if he was fired WITHOUT CAUSE.also was schiano actually succeeding guaranteed, yet he gets a 25million guarantee???
and I like schiano
They don't go to games, buy tickets and parking or donate. Yet they have their stupid opinion with no solution.Notice the people who start these threads don't offer any names or suggestions. Very telling.
Hey @WhiteBus, how long you been doing this? For me it is 43 years. What evidence from our past suggests Rutgers got this right and dodged a bullet? NONEThey don't go to games, buy tickets and parking or donate. Yet they have their stupid opinion with no solution.
Have you ready any of the other 500 threads calling to fire Hobbs? People on this board really think he could make that decision on his own without some knowledge of what the final offer would have been.Skeptical of what? And why do you KnighShift make arguments to things that don't exist? Nobody suggested Hobbs did anything other than what he was told. This thread was started by saying Greg was offered 8/32M and I pointed out that is not what he was offered.
Again why are you making a rebuttal to something was was never said or implied?Have you ready any of the other 500 threads calling to fire Hobbs? People on this board really think he could make that decision on his own without some knowledge of what the final offer would have been.
Fire Hobbs FirstI understand the disappointment the fan base has not getting Schiano but in my opinion the second acts never work out. I was always hesitant about Schiano. Rutgers needs to find an up and coming Head Coach who can recruit and will be our Schiano of the future. Now trusting Rutgers to do that is where I have serious doubts.
Greg got offered a better contract here than he did in Tennessee... a power program in the SEC and with looking to get serious with facility improvements ...
I think he has the best resume of the coacnhes that we can afford...and $4 million a year and $7.5 million for staff really should have got things started for him
He overplayed his hand here ....especially with the control and autonomy he wanted of the program. He should have known this isn’t possible anywhere given what happened at penn state. And while I’m sure a lot of those concerns come with having an AD with no football experience and not knowing who the next school president is, he knows that wasn’t going to fly here. Period.
So while I don’t know if we dodged a bullet, he asked in totality too nuch for what he has accomplished.
Offer the 8 and raise the salary to a relevant coach! A real winner.
Who are you? I wasn't even replying to anything you said. Maybe it's time to stop drinking and yelling on a message board about things you clearly don't understand. Why don't you go sign a petition to help fire an AD who didn't want to give an unemployed coach 8/32 with $24 million guaranteed (Saban type of guarantee) after that same AD got bashed for giving a guy 7/10 guaranteed.Again why are you making a rebuttal to something was was never said or implied?
It seems people CANNOT be open-minded enough to take things at face value. My original post simply corrected the fallacy that 8yr/32M was not enough for Greg. Greg was not offered that...he countered with that when he did not get fieldhouse. That is it no other purpose to original post. Yet, folks repeatedly keep bringing up rebuttal points to things I never suggested. Where did I say Hobbs made this decision on his own?
Go look at post #113 you replied to my post imbecile.Who are you? I wasn't even replying to anything you said. Maybe it's time to stop drinking and yelling on a message board about things you clearly don't understand. Why don't you go sign a petition to help fire an AD who didn't want to give an unemployed coach 8/32 with $24 million guaranteed (Saban type of guarantee) after that same AD got bashed for giving a guy 7/10 guaranteed.