Fot those that are curious to his landing spot. http://espn.go.com/college-football...esota-golden-gophers-qb-philip-nelson-walk-on
Wish he walked on here. Another example of jumping to conclusions. Can't wait until Dailey news....
Guess you have never been a drunk kid who got punched. Not excusing it but courts agree he didn't act differently than many youthHe did kick the guy in the head when he was down. The fact that it did not cause the brain damage does not excuse it.
Wish he walked on here. Another example of jumping to conclusions. Can't wait until Dailey news....
Fot those that are curious to his landing spot. http://espn.go.com/college-football...esota-golden-gophers-qb-philip-nelson-walk-on
Yes, this Board jumped to conclusions. It always does when it comes to these type of cases because we have a habit of jumping on the first tweet and never paying attention to the actual details as they arise."Jumping to conclusions"? He was arrested and convicted of assault. Don't be ridiculous, we had no choice but to toss him.
Yes, this Board jumped to conclusions. It always does when it comes to these type of cases because we have a habit of jumping on the first tweet and never paying attention to the actual details as they arise.
-------Guess you have never been a drunk kid who got punched. Not excusing it but courts agree he didn't act differently than many youth
And somehow everyone in society has to take action against a kid who did something in the heat of the moment? Back in the day we didn't get fired from our jobs or kicked off of sports teams if we got in trouble with the law. Now virtually everyone feels they have to weigh in and demand someone lose everything if one of their transgressions, either real or alleged, comes to light. Our blood-in-the-water penchant is truly pathetic, absurd, and, even worse, heartless.He did kick the guy in the head when he was down. The fact that it did not cause the brain damage does not excuse it.
yea, Can't imagine why a program that constantly talks about FAMILY would give a guy a second chance after the legal process played out.whether he's legally guilty or not doesn't matter, why the hell would Rutgers want that publicity of a player who gave someone brain damage in a fight. Do you think they should've kept Mike Rice as coach too?
I thought the same thing. If I recall correctly didn't the kid who was put in a coma start the whole incident. Thought I remembered he threw the first punch from behind Nelson. I could be wrong but why was his actions never discussed.Not one person mentioned Nelson was sucker punched first. What normal person doesn't fly into all out rage when violated? I'm not excusing his actions, but I understand his reaction. Bottom line, as we experience things in life we make better decisions and that usual come with age and miss steps. Btw, we as a society preach second changes, but seldom give people one. What does that make us?
yea, Can't imagine why a program that constantly talks about FAMILY would give a guy a second chance after the legal process played out.
read much? legal process is over and that's when I asked if we offered him a second chance. will be upset when dailey comes back in the spring?by that logic the Pats should keep Aaron Hernandez on the team until he's convicted of murder. Go embarrass your company in public and see if they keep you around while they wait for the legal process.
Not one person mentioned Nelson was sucker punched first. What normal person doesn't fly into all out rage when violated? I'm not excusing his actions, but I understand his reaction. Bottom line, as we experience things in life we make better decisions and that usual come with age and miss steps. Btw, we as a society preach second changes, but seldom give people one. What does that make us?
who said he shouldn't have been removed?I dont think the discussion was about giving him a second chance, it was that he should not have been removed from the Rutgers team. Two different discussions.
I'm not making excuses for him, he f'd up and paid the consequences. By all accounts, he was a good kid and teammate and kid. If the courts are satisfied then so am I. Would you be against Dailey coming back once his case is settled?VKJ- it is one of the few times I disagree with you. I don't think he is a bad kid but being drunk is not an excuse and he is underage.
No different then drunk driving. Most people, when sober, say they would never do it. Then they get drunk and make a drunk/dumb decision to do so.
I am ok with him getting a second chance but certainly not here and being drunk is not an excuse.
If it was found that he was a willing participant- no...wrong place, wrong time, yes...Nelson was drunk and no one made him take that late kick to the head. by all other accounts, he is a great kid. HE made a huge mistake but it was not a case of his friend kicking the kid and he was blamed by association. I am all for both of them getting a second chance but I don't think we could get away with taking either back.I'm not making excuses for him, he f'd up and paid the consequences. By all accounts, he was a good kid and teammate and kid. If the courts are satisfied then so am I. Would you be against Dailey coming back once his case is settled?
Yup. Played in a spring game here while he had to sit out the season, went home and this incident occurred.Did this kid ever enroll or practice with the team?