I thought he was a package deal lolAgreed. Martini is a marginal upgrade at best. Not sure why anyone's that excited over this possible get. I agree about the athleticism part too.
I thought he was a package deal lolAgreed. Martini is a marginal upgrade at best. Not sure why anyone's that excited over this possible get. I agree about the athleticism part too.
If it were, that'd be different. No evidence of that though. In fact, seems Allocco's family has ruled out RU.I thought he was a package deal lol
His performance last night emphatically says otherwise.That’s correct. He may be listed as a PG but he is did not play the point for his high school team. Isiah Brown, soon to be teammate of Chol is a pure point and played that position on Dylan’s team. Dylan is a go to scorer. That’s his role and will be his role at Rutgers too first and foremost. He’s a good enough ball handler to run the point if he had to, I’m sure, but he’s not being brought here to be an elite passer nor is that what his scouting report focuses on. His job is to score. Sometimes he may bring the ball up and create for himself.
It depends. Tell me how strong the Murray twins on Iowa were. the freshman Christie on Minnesota who beat us. Or Ace Bailey lol.Strength has a great deal to do with it. It made him an easy mark in many games. Pushed , shoved off balance. At this level you need a combination of many things. If strength was not an issue why does EVERY program have a strength , conditioning and even a dietician on their staffs.
👍 i was also going to point out Bailey but was worried I would get mauled by rabid posters lol. But it's the truth.It depends. Tell me how strong the Murray twins on Iowa were. the freshman Christie on Minnesota who beat us. Or Ace Bailey lol.
In our misguided offense with usually 3 guards, all shorter than 6’4”, Gavin had to be a good rebounder for us. Especially when Cliff was not in the game, or was in the game but was completely out of position, which was a lot.
So, he did get pushed around but again that’s due to roster fail.
GG on a team as a 3 with a solid 4 and 5 would not have stood out as a poor rebounder.
But isn’t the problem GG sees him self as a 2 guard lolIt depends. Tell me how strong the Murray twins on Iowa were. the freshman Christie on Minnesota who beat us. Or Ace Bailey lol.
In our misguided offense with usually 3 guards, all shorter than 6’4”, Gavin had to be a good rebounder for us. Especially when Cliff was not in the game, or was in the game but was completely out of position, which was a lot.
So, he did get pushed around but again that’s due to roster fail.
GG on a team as a 3 with a solid 4 and 5 would not have stood out as a poor rebounder.
You heard it here first: in a 3 guard offense Ace will get abused on the boards next year.
I think a lot of people didn’t because they knew he had to be played in order to stay next year.If he was so bad why did no one on the message board agree when I said he shouldn't have been in the rotation?
Seemed like his progress was made in what some would call "garbage time" games where the season goals were essentially over for RU.Did he really make “great strides” or was he simply not playing “as awful” as before? Yes, I understand he had two games where he hit a bunch of three pointers but sandwiched between those games was another 1-5 game from deep on 2 of 10 total shooting.
Jaden Jones vibes? I dont recall Jaden getting getting major minutes in the last few games of the year scoring points
It was an all star game!His performance last night emphatically says otherwise.
His performance last night emphatically says otherwise.
I’m hoping an A10 or NEC team grabs him first.This Martini seems to have his feet in cement. His highlight reel is just him getting kick outs for open 3s.
point is, his strength would have nothing to do with his positional rebounding ability if the team had a legit 4 or a consistent 5. Wolf was virtually unplayable on both ends and Cliff was usually lost on REB opportunities. So we blame GG for poor team rebounding ?But isn’t the problem GG sees him self as a 2 guard lol
point is, his strength would have nothing to do with his positional ability if the team had a legit 4 or a consistent 5. Wolf was virtually unplayable on both ends and Cliff was usually lost on REB opportunities.
He’s had exactly two players who were considered “top talent” in recruiting rankings. Cliff I would consider to be both developed and retained. So he’s 1 for 2 at worst. And if Gavin never pans out anywhere that would be 1 for 1
Cliff's freak athleticism is why so many teams are intrigued. Pretty much no big guy is as athletic as him. That doesn't make him a great baller though.Cliff is one of the top prospects in the portal. Say what? If our guard play and lack of shooters hurt anyone it was definitely Cliff. With no perimeter threats teams clogged up the paint on D. Cliff’s bad year was a result of that - evident by worse performance than other years by him.
So in summary, it’s really the exact opposite of what you’ve been saying. Teams were daring us to shoot over and over again. The issue wasn’t about open looks. They wanted us to shoot because we were so bad at it collectively as a team They stacked the box and dared us to shoot from the outside often.
You must be fun at partiesIt depends. Tell me how strong the Murray twins on Iowa were. the freshman Christie on Minnesota who beat us. Or Ace Bailey lol.
In our misguided offense with usually 3 guards, all shorter than 6’4”, Gavin had to be a good rebounder for us. Especially when Cliff was not in the game, or was in the game but was completely out of position, which was a lot.
So, he did get pushed around but again that’s due to roster fail.
GG on a team as a 3 with a solid 4 and 5 would not have stood out as a poor rebounder.
You heard it here first: in a 3 guard offense Ace will get abused on the boards next year.
Of course I am. I bring the LoBro and homemade Funyuns.You must be fun at parties
Oscar's tied hard I will give him that, but he defense was no better. It was better in the long run to give a freshman the time to develop than a 5th year senior who is not getting any better.More talented and performing better are not the same thing. At the time, Oskar had better season statistics. He was not worse on defense. That meets the definition of performing better.
I said recently, CO is the greatest waste of athleticism of all time. He’d be the most athletic NBA big man if only he could catch, pass, dribble or shoot. But he can’t do any of those things even at the HS varsity level.Cliff's freak athleticism is why so many teams are intrigued. Pretty much no big guy is as athletic as him. That doesn't make him a great baller though.
Not really. Once Cliff got the ball it never came back out. But yes, other teams let our guards lose games for us. Again, GG wasn’t the reason the O was near the bottom of 350 D1 teams.Cliff is one of the top prospects in the portal. Say what? If our guard play and lack of shooters hurt anyone it was definitely Cliff. With no perimeter threats teams clogged up the paint on D. Cliff’s bad year was a result of that - evident by worse performance than other years by him.
So in summary, it’s really the exact opposite of what you’ve been saying. Teams were daring us to shoot over and over again. The issue wasn’t about open looks. They wanted us to shoot because we were so bad at it collectively as a team They stacked the box and dared us to shoot from the outside often.
dammit. Better be as a backup or we’re sunk.I’m hoping an A10 or NEC team grabs him first.
Not really. Once Cliff got the ball it never came back out. But yes, other teams let our guards lose games for us. Again, GG wasn’t the reason the O was near the bottom of 350 D1 teams.
To addNo not really. He looked fantastic. But that doesn’t mean that over the course of a season he wont produce more points and be more efficient in the halfcourt sets with someone else responsible for feeding him the ball.
Remember - just because a player projects to be an NBA PG does not mean their HS and college teams who are otherwise not surrounded by 4 other future NBA caliber playmakers on the court are best off with that kid running the point as opposed to someone else who can execute running plays for them. We’ll see.
Oskar played tough, gave up his body, and was a better defender.Oscar's tied hard I will give him that, but he defense was no better. It was better in the long run to give a freshman the time to develop than a 5th year senior who is not getting any better.
To add
1. We have a PG already
2. It would be an inefficient use of his talent
3. He would be asked to be a primary ball handler, run the offense, play defense and score. Too much on a freshman plate
Really? Who might that be?To add
1. We have a PG already
2. It would be an inefficient use of his talent
3. He would be asked to be a primary ball handler, run the offense, play defense and score. Too much on a freshman plate
never heard of homemade Funyuns. How do you make those lol?Of course I am. I bring the LoBro and homemade Funyuns.
I am guessing multiple people will start the offense. If I’m playing ru next year my best defender is on Dylan denying him the ball at least early in the shot clock. Once he gets it I expect a lot of pick and roll or with someone that can shoot pick and pop. It’s going to be very interesting. I am hoping Bailey doesn’t force things to much and lets it come to him.Steph Curry’s collegiate path demonstrates the point well. Davidson was a better team his junior year when Steph played off ball.
Also - whether Dylan plays more on or off ball next season will have no bearing one way or the other on his NBA trajectory. He doesn’t need to prove to scouts that he can handle the rock as a primary ball handler. The scouting report already says he has the handling skills.
Davidson had an NBA-(bench)caliber point guard (pre a career ending injury) that year who led the NCAA in assists and had 13 assists and zero turnovers against Wisconsin in the Sweet 16.Steph Curry’s collegiate path demonstrates the point well. Davidson was a better team his junior year when Steph played off ball.
Also - whether Dylan plays more on or off ball next season will have no bearing one way or the other on his NBA trajectory. He doesn’t need to prove to scouts that he can handle the rock as a primary ball handler. The scouting report already says he has the handling skills.
Pretty sure both Murray twins were like 20 lbs thicker than Gavin. He mostly, until the end of the year, played as one of the three guards when he was out there.It depends. Tell me how strong the Murray twins on Iowa were. the freshman Christie on Minnesota who beat us. Or Ace Bailey lol.
In our misguided offense with usually 3 guards, all shorter than 6’4”, Gavin had to be a good rebounder for us. Especially when Cliff was not in the game, or was in the game but was completely out of position, which was a lot.
So, he did get pushed around but again that’s due to roster fail.
GG on a team as a 3 with a solid 4 and 5 would not have stood out as a poor rebounder.
You heard it here first: in a 3 guard offense Ace will get abused on the boards next year.
Davidson had an NBA-(bench)caliber point guard (pre a career ending injury) that year who led the NCAA in assists and had 13 assists and zero turnovers against Wisconsin in the Sweet 16.
Here's an interesting stat, kind of off topic, kind of not:Nobody said Gavin was the only reason our offense was bad. How could he be when he only played 17 mpg? The point is, no team guarded us tightly on the perimeter. They wanted us to shoot from the outside because we rarely made it. That included when Gavin had the ball. The game plan against us was to make things hard inside for Cliff, Mag, Hyatt, etc. in the paint because on average, that was our best chance of scoring. So once again - your theory that Gavin never got any open looks just isnt true. Everyone got there share of open looks on our team. They just didn’t knock them down at an efficient rate.
I didn't suggest anything. I was stating a fact. But if you're asking me directly IMO was Jason Richards a better point guard than JWill - I mean.... no question. And I like JWill. And that's from watching both not "googling."Of course he had a ton of assists. He was feeding Steph Curry in the Southern Conference.
Your suggestion that Jason Richards was an NBA caliber PG with far superior skills to J Will is laughable. He went undrafted and then got an opportunity to play in the G league, but come on man. Compare Jeremiah’s time at Temple to Richard’s frosh and sophomore years. Richards rode the bench as a frosh and played 15 mpg as a sophomore. To say there’s no way Jeremiah can have the same success with kids like Dylan and Ace to feed the ball to makes no sense.